Capturing Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Data Electronically: The Past, Present, and Promise of ePRO Measurement in Clinical Trials

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are an important means of evaluating the treatment benefit of new medical products. It is recognized that PRO measures should be used when assessing concepts best known by the patient or best measured from the patient’s perspective. As a result, there is growing emphasis on well defined and reliable PRO measures. In addition, advances in technology have significantly increased electronic PRO (ePRO) data collection capabilities and options in clinical trials. The movement from paper-based to ePRO data capture has enhanced the integrity and accuracy of clinical trial data and is encouraged by regulators. A primary distinction in the types of ePRO platforms is between telephone-based interactive voice response systems and screen-based systems. Handheld touchscreen-based devices have become the mainstay for remote (i.e., off-site, unsupervised) PRO data collection in clinical trials. The conventional approach is to provide study subjects with a handheld device with a device-based proprietary software program. However, an emerging alternative for clinical trials is called bring your own device (BYOD). Leveraging study subjects’ own Internet-enabled mobile devices for remote PRO data collection (via a downloadable app or a Web-based data collection portal) has become possible due to the widespread use of personal smartphones and tablets. However, there are a number of scientific and operational issues that must be addressed before BYOD can be routinely considered as a practical alternative to conventional ePRO data collection methods. Nevertheless, the future for ePRO data collection is bright and the promise of BYOD opens a new chapter in its evolution.

[1]  Brian Tiplady Electronic Patient Diaries and Questionnaires — ePRO Now Delivering on the Promise , 2010, The patient.

[2]  David Cella,et al.  Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report. , 2009, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[3]  D V Doyle,et al.  Touch-screen computer systems in the rheumatology clinic offer a reliable and user-friendly means of collecting quality-of-life and outcome data from patients with rheumatoid arthritis. , 2006, Rheumatology.

[4]  D. Forman,et al.  Automated collection of quality-of-life data: a comparison of paper and computer touch-screen questionnaires. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  J. Pearson,et al.  Data Quality and Power in Clinical Trials: A Comparison of ePRO and Paper in a Randomized Trial , 2016 .

[6]  Arthur Zbrozek,et al.  Validation of electronic systems to collect patient-reported outcome (PRO) data-recommendations for clinical trial teams: report of the ISPOR ePRO systems validation good research practices task force. , 2013, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[7]  B. Tiplady,et al.  Diary Design Considerations: Interface Issues and Patient Acceptability , 2016 .

[8]  D. Patrick,et al.  Validation of electronic data capture of the Irritable Bowel Syndrome--Quality of Life Measure, the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire for Irritable Bowel Syndrome and the EuroQol. , 2006, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[9]  Jean Paty,et al.  PRO data collection in clinical trials using mixed modes: report of the ISPOR PRO mixed modes good research practices task force. , 2014, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[10]  S. Shiffman,et al.  Patient non-compliance with paper diaries , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  S. Shiffman,et al.  Patient compliance with paper and electronic diaries. , 2003, Controlled clinical trials.

[12]  O. Dale,et al.  Despite technical problems personal digital assistants outperform pen and paper when collecting patient diary data. , 2007, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[13]  M. Hyland,et al.  Diary keeping in asthma: comparison of written and electronic methods. , 1993, BMJ.

[14]  N. Leidy,et al.  Standardizing measurement of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations. Reliability and validity of a patient-reported diary. , 2011, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[15]  Bill Byrom,et al.  ePro: Electronic Solutions for Patient-Reported Data , 2010 .

[16]  Alan L. Shields,et al.  Patient Compliance in an ePRO Environment: Methods for Consistent Compliance Management, Measurement and Reporting , 2016 .

[17]  S. Shiffman,et al.  Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a meta-analytic review. , 2008, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.