Capturing Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Data Electronically: The Past, Present, and Promise of ePRO Measurement in Clinical Trials
暂无分享,去创建一个
Paul O’Donohoe | Stephen Joel Coons | J. Jason Lundy | Sonya Eremenco | Hannah O’Gorman | William Malizia | S. Coons | P. O’Donohoe | H. O’Gorman | S. Eremenco | J. J. Lundy | William Malizia | J. Lundy | Stephen Joel Coons | S. Eremenco | S. J. Coons | bullet J Jason Lundy | Paul O | Donohoe bullet | Hannah O | Gorman bullet | W. Malizia | J. J. Lundy | P. O 'donohoe | H. O 'gorman
[1] Brian Tiplady. Electronic Patient Diaries and Questionnaires — ePRO Now Delivering on the Promise , 2010, The patient.
[2] David Cella,et al. Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report. , 2009, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.
[3] D V Doyle,et al. Touch-screen computer systems in the rheumatology clinic offer a reliable and user-friendly means of collecting quality-of-life and outcome data from patients with rheumatoid arthritis. , 2006, Rheumatology.
[4] D. Forman,et al. Automated collection of quality-of-life data: a comparison of paper and computer touch-screen questionnaires. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[5] J. Pearson,et al. Data Quality and Power in Clinical Trials: A Comparison of ePRO and Paper in a Randomized Trial , 2016 .
[6] Arthur Zbrozek,et al. Validation of electronic systems to collect patient-reported outcome (PRO) data-recommendations for clinical trial teams: report of the ISPOR ePRO systems validation good research practices task force. , 2013, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.
[7] B. Tiplady,et al. Diary Design Considerations: Interface Issues and Patient Acceptability , 2016 .
[8] D. Patrick,et al. Validation of electronic data capture of the Irritable Bowel Syndrome--Quality of Life Measure, the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire for Irritable Bowel Syndrome and the EuroQol. , 2006, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.
[9] Jean Paty,et al. PRO data collection in clinical trials using mixed modes: report of the ISPOR PRO mixed modes good research practices task force. , 2014, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.
[10] S. Shiffman,et al. Patient non-compliance with paper diaries , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[11] S. Shiffman,et al. Patient compliance with paper and electronic diaries. , 2003, Controlled clinical trials.
[12] O. Dale,et al. Despite technical problems personal digital assistants outperform pen and paper when collecting patient diary data. , 2007, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[13] M. Hyland,et al. Diary keeping in asthma: comparison of written and electronic methods. , 1993, BMJ.
[14] N. Leidy,et al. Standardizing measurement of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations. Reliability and validity of a patient-reported diary. , 2011, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.
[15] Bill Byrom,et al. ePro: Electronic Solutions for Patient-Reported Data , 2010 .
[16] Alan L. Shields,et al. Patient Compliance in an ePRO Environment: Methods for Consistent Compliance Management, Measurement and Reporting , 2016 .
[17] S. Shiffman,et al. Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a meta-analytic review. , 2008, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.