The expression of non-actual motion in Swedish sign language

The use of motion expressions to describe objects that are actually static (e.g. “The train tracks curves through the mountain”) has been of interest within the fields of linguistics and cognitive science for at least three decades (e.g. Langacker, 1990; Matsumuto, 1996; Talmy, 2000a; Matlock, 2004a; Zlatev & Blomberg, 2013). In this thesis, such descriptions will be referred to as Non-Actual Motion (NAM) sentences/expressions. On the basis of theoretical and empirical considerations of the spatial semantics and form-meaning mappings of Swedish Sign Language (SSL), a small elicitation study was conducted. The target stimuli of the study (i.e. pictures of spatial scenes with objects that are extended horizontally [e.g. roads and fences]) were expected to elicit a higher amount of NAM expressions compared to control stimuli (i.e. pictures of objects less extended in space [e.g. trees and benches]). Using the semantic framework of Holistic Spatial Semantics (HSS) (Zlatev, 2003), some patterns of NAM-expression were found to be similar to those of three spoken languages: Swedish, French and Thai (Blomberg, 2014). Target stimuli designed to cue a higher amount of NAM-expressions did so, which provides further support for theories suggesting that cognitive processes such as enactive perception and mental scanning motivate the use of NAM-sentences in SSL just as for spoken languages. However, SSL also showed a wide array of language- and modality- specific conventions: the iconicity in the modality of SSL allows more precise and dynamic descriptions of spatial experiences. For example, fewer overt expressions of NAM were used than in the spoken languages. Still, the expression of motion-related semantic categories through more or less iconic signs forms, such as depicting verbs and modified adverbs, were found in higher numbers in descriptions of stimuli pictures of objects that afford human translocation.

[1]  Göran Sonesson,et al.  Pictorial concepts. Inquiries into the semiotic heritage and its relevance for the analysis of the visual world , 1989 .

[2]  S. Kita,et al.  The sound symbolism bootstrapping hypothesis for language acquisition and language evolution , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  J. Zlatev,et al.  Actual and non-actual motion: why experientialist semantics needs phenomenology (and vice versa) , 2014 .

[4]  W. Stokoe,et al.  Sign language structure: an outline of the visual communication systems of the American deaf. 1960. , 1961, Journal of deaf studies and deaf education.

[5]  Sotaro Kita,et al.  Japanese Enter/Exit Verbs Without Motion Semantics , 1999 .

[6]  Putnam,et al.  The Collected Papers. , 1988 .

[7]  Jordan Zlatev,et al.  Translocation, language and the categorization of experience , 2010 .

[8]  Jordan Zlatev,et al.  Holistic spatial semantics of Thai , 2003 .

[9]  J. Zlatev,et al.  Motivations for Sound Symbolism in Spatial Deixis: A Typological Study of 101 Languages , 1970 .

[10]  J. Zlatev,et al.  A third way to travel: The place of Thai in motion event typology. , 2004 .

[11]  B. Bergen The Psychological Reality of Phonaesthemes , 2004 .

[12]  Johan Blomberg,et al.  Motion in Language and Experience : Actual and Non-actual motion in Swedish, French and Thai , 2014 .

[13]  Gabriella Vigliocco,et al.  Iconicity as a General Property of Language: Evidence from Spoken and Signed Languages , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[14]  T. Matlock Fictive motion as cognitive simulation , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[15]  Leonard Talmy,et al.  Semantics and syntax of motion , 1975 .

[16]  Teenie Matlock,et al.  The Conceptual Motivation of Fictive Motion * , 2004 .

[17]  Jordan Zlatev,et al.  Cross-modal iconicity: A cognitive semiotic approach to sound symbolism , 2010 .

[18]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Grounding Cognition: Introduction to Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thinking , 2005 .

[19]  Dan I. Slobin,et al.  Reference to Movement in Spoken and Signed Languages: Typological Considerations , 1994 .

[20]  W. Bruce Croft,et al.  Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions , 2010 .

[21]  Teenie Matlock,et al.  Abstract motion is no longer abstract , 2010, Language and Cognition.

[22]  Dan I. Slobin,et al.  The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events , 2004 .

[23]  Chris Sinha,et al.  Distributed Spatial Semantics , 1995, Nordic Journal of Linguistics.

[24]  A. Goldberg,et al.  Construction grammar. , 2010, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[25]  K. Emmorey Iconicity impacts linguistic processes : metaphor and anaphora ( a ) Iconic constraints on metaphorical extensions , 2014 .

[26]  J. Zlatev Situated Embodiment : Studies in the emergence of spatial meaning , 1997 .

[27]  Pia Simper-Allen Avbildande verbkonstruktioner i svenskt teckenspråk : Handformskategorier inom "Cut and Break"-domänen , 2013 .

[28]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Synaesthesia? A window into perception, thought and language , 2001 .

[29]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Whither structured representation? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[30]  Neil Cohn,et al.  Path salience in motion events from verbal and visual languages , 2017, CogSci.

[31]  Jürgen N. J. James Iraide Sotaro Friederike Felix K Bohnemeyer,et al.  Principles of event segmentation in language: The case of motion events , 2007 .

[32]  E. Reed The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1989 .

[33]  Leonard Talmy,et al.  Path to Realization: A Typology of Event Conflation , 1991 .

[34]  Beth Levin,et al.  The typology of motion expressions revisited1 , 2009, Journal of Linguistics.

[35]  Lasse Wallin Polysyntetiska tecken i svenska teckenspråket , 1994 .

[36]  Scott K. Liddell Grammar, Gesture, and Meaning in American Sign Language , 2003 .

[37]  L. Talmy Toward a Cognitive Semantics , 2003 .

[38]  S. Levinson Frames of reference and Molyneux's question: Cross-linguistic evidence , 1996 .

[39]  Jürgen Bohnemeyer,et al.  The language-specificity of Conceptual Structure: , 2008 .

[40]  D. Maurer,et al.  Synesthesia: a new approach to understanding the development of perception. , 2013, Developmental psychology.

[41]  J. Zlatev Spatial Semantics , 2006 .

[42]  Ferdinand de Saussure Course in General Linguistics , 1916 .