Motivation in a computer-supported collaborative learning scenario and its impact on learning activities and knowledge acquisition

Abstract Addressing a drawback in current research on computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL), this study investigated the influence of motivation on learning activities and knowledge acquisition during CSCL. Participants’ ( N  = 200 university students) task was to develop a handout for which they had first an individual preparing phase followed by a computer-supported collaborative learning phase immediately afterwards. It was hypothesized that in both phases current motivation (in terms of expectancy and value components) influences both learning activities and knowledge acquisition in a positive way. According to main results, only goal orientations (before learning) were associated with knowledge acquisition respectively observed learning activities during the collaborative phase. Expectancy and value components of current motivation related neither to observed learning activities nor to knowledge acquisition during collaborative learning but were in part associated with learning activities and knowledge acquisition during individual learning. The discussion addresses several possible explanations for these unexpected results.

[1]  Shelly L. Gable,et al.  Achievement goals, study strategies, and exam performance: A mediational analysis. , 1999 .

[2]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[3]  Mike Robson,et al.  Problem-Solving in Groups , 1988 .

[4]  F. Fischer,et al.  Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools , 2002 .

[5]  N. Webb.  Task-Related Verbal Interaction and Mathematics Learning in Small Groups. , 1991 .

[6]  Regina Vollmeyer,et al.  Motivation and action in self-regulated learning. , 2000 .

[7]  S. Hidi,et al.  Interest, Learning, and the Psychological Processes That Mediate Their Relationship. , 2002 .

[8]  Rainer Bromme,et al.  What matters in help-seeking? A study of help effectiveness and learner-related factors , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[9]  Eric Anthony Day,et al.  Collaborative Training With a More Experienced Partner: Remediating Low Pretraining Self-Efficacy in Complex Skill Acquisition , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[10]  N. Kerr.  Motivation losses in small groups: a social dilemma analysis , 1983 .

[11]  Armin Weinberger,et al.  Scripts for Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning , 2003 .

[12]  A. Elliot,et al.  Handbook of Competence and Motivation , 2013 .

[13]  Shu-Ling Wang,et al.  The effects of group composition of self-efficacy and collective efficacy on computer-supported collaborative learning , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[14]  John McCormick,et al.  Motivational and Self-Regulated Learning Components of Musical Practice , 1999 .

[15]  P. Alexander,et al.  A Motivated Exploration of Motivation Terminology. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[16]  Ulrich Schiefele,et al.  Lernstrategien im Studium: Ergebnisse zur Faktorenstruktur und Reliabilität eines neuen Fragebogens. , 1994 .

[17]  Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al.  Group processes in the classroom. , 1996 .

[18]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  Generalizing test-enhanced learning from the laboratory to the classroom , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[19]  F. Fischer,et al.  A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[20]  D. Clements,et al.  Social-cognitive behaviors and higher-order thinking in educational computer environments , 1992 .

[21]  W. Joolingen,et al.  Motivation and performance within a collaborative computer-based modeling task: relations between students’ achievement goal orientation, self-efficacy, cognitive processing, and achievement , 2008 .

[22]  W. Doise.  The social development of the intellect , 1984 .

[23]  F. Fischer,et al.  Knowledge convergence in collaborative learning: Concepts and assessment , 2007 .

[24]  M. Valcke,et al.  Structuring asynchronous discussion groups: Comparing scripting by assigning roles with regulation by cross-age peer tutors , 2010 .

[25]  C. Boxtel,et al.  Collaborative learning tasks and the elaboration of conceptual knowledge. , 2000 .

[26]  A. Krapp.  Interest, motivation and learning: An educational-psychological perspective , 1999 .

[27]  E. Denessen,et al.  Effects of a Cooperative Learning Program on the Elaborations of Students During Help Seeking and Help Giving , 2005 .

[28]  Ulrike Cress,et al.  The need for considering multilevel analysis in CSCL research—An appeal for the use of more advanced statistical methods , 2008, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[29]  Regina Vollmeyer,et al.  Motivational Effects on Self-Regulated Learning with Different Tasks , 2006 .

[30]  Marco Vicentini,et al.  Classroom discussion and individual problem-solving in the teaching of history: Do different instructional approaches affect interest in different ways? , 2007 .

[31]  Susanne Narciss,et al.  Benefits and Constraints of Distributed Cognition in Foreign Language Learning , 2008 .

[32]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  Daniel C. Moos,et al.  Multimedia, hypermedia, and hypertext: Motivation considered and reconsidered , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[34]  Frank Fischer,et al.  Computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning and classroom scripts: Effects on help-seeking processes and learning outcomes , 2011 .

[35]  Claire O'Malley,et al.  Anonymity in classroom voting and debating , 2011 .

[36]  A. King.  Guiding Knowledge Construction in the Classroom: Effects of Teaching Children How to Question and How to Explain , 1994 .

[37]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. , 1990 .

[38]  S. Volet,et al.  Group work does not necessarily equal collaborative learning: evidence from observations and self-reports , 2010 .

[39]  F. Rheinberg.  The Motivational Analysis of High-Risk Sport , 1987 .

[40]  Sanna Järvelä,et al.  Understanding the dynamics of motivation in socially shared learning , 2008 .

[41]  P. Pintrich.  Motivation and Classroom Learning , 2003 .

[42]  M. Bannert,et al.  Assessment of metacognitive skills by means of instruction to think aloud and reflect when prompted. Does the verbalisation method affect learning? , 2008 .

[43]  J. Graham,et al.  Missing data analysis: making it work in the real world. , 2009, Annual review of psychology.

[44]  Jutta Heckhausen,et al.  Motivation and action , 1991 .

[45]  Kipling D. Williams,et al.  Interpersonal Relations and Group Processes Social Loafing: a Meta-analytic Review and Theoretical Integration , 2022 .

[46]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Dyadic Data Analysis , 2006 .

[47]  Frank M. Pajares,et al.  Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Academic Settings , 1996 .

[48]  H. Heckhausen.  Achievement motivation and its constructs: A cognitive model , 1977 .

[49]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches , 1999 .

[50]  Peter Reimann,et al.  Time is precious: why process analysis is essential for CSCL (and can also help to bridge between experimental and descriptive methods) , 2007, CSCL.

[51]  Julius Kuhl,et al.  Motivation, Intention, and Volition , 1987 .

[52]  Paul Vedder,et al.  Exploring the links between students' engagement in cooperative learning, their goal preferences and appraisals of instructional conditions in the classroom , 2007 .

[53]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Handbook of self-regulation , 2000 .

[54]  J. Eccles,et al.  Expectancy-Value Theory of Achievement Motivation. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[55]  Jan-Willem Strijbos,et al.  Content analysis: What are they talking about? , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[56]  Rachel Hertz-Lazarovits,et al.  Interaction in cooperative groups : the theoretical anatomy of group learning , 1992 .

[57]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Motivation and collaborative behavior: an exploratory analysis , 2009, CSCL.

[58]  S. Järvelä,et al.  The Interaction of Motivational Orientation and Knowledge-Seeking Inquiry in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning , 1999 .

[59]  Petri Nokelainen,et al.  A shared document-based annotation tool to support learner-centred collaborative learning , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[60]  J. Eccles,et al.  Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[61]  Frank M. Pajares,et al.  Competence perceptions and academic functioning , 2005 .

[62]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[63]  James C. Lester,et al.  Diagnosing Self-efficacy in Intelligent Tutoring Systems: An Empirical Study , 2006, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[64]  Jr. James R. Larson.  In Search of Synergy in Small Group Performance , 2009 .

[65]  Lernen durch Erklären: Was, wenn Rückfragen gestellt werden? , 1996 .