Direction counts: a comparative study of spatially directional counting biases in cultures with different reading directions.

Western adults associate small numbers with left space and large numbers with right space. Where does this pervasive spatial-numerical association come from? In this study, we first recorded directional counting preferences in adults with different reading experiences (left to right, right to left, mixed, and illiterate) and observed a clear relationship between reading and counting directions. We then recorded directional counting preferences in preschoolers and elementary school children from three of these reading cultures (left to right, right to left, and mixed). Culture-specific counting biases existed before reading acquisition in children as young as 3 years and were subsequently modified by early reading experience. Together, our results suggest that both directional counting and scanning activities contribute to number-space associations.

[1]  D. Berch,et al.  Extracting parity and magnitude from Arabic numerals: developmental changes in number processing and mental representation. , 1999, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[2]  Guilherme Wood,et al.  On the Cognitive Link between Space and Number: A Meta-Analysis of the SNARC Effect , 2008 .

[3]  Pieter Reitsma,et al.  Developing access to number magnitude: a study of the SNARC effect in 7- to 9-year-olds. , 2008, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[4]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  Spontaneous mapping of number and space in adults and young children , 2009, Cognition.

[5]  Clarissa A. Thompson,et al.  Early development of spatial-numeric associations: evidence from spatial and quantitative performance of preschoolers. , 2010, Developmental science.

[6]  Martin H. Fischer,et al.  Finger counting habits modulate spatial-numerical associations , 2008, Cortex.

[7]  C. Gallistel,et al.  The Child's Understanding of Number , 1979 .

[8]  Robert S. Siegler,et al.  A featural analysis of preschoolers' counting knowledge. , 1984 .

[9]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[10]  K. Fuson.  Children's Counting and Concepts of Number , 1987 .

[11]  Samuel Shaki,et al.  Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[12]  Martin H. Fischer,et al.  The Cultural Number Line: A Review of Cultural and Linguistic Influences on the Development of Number Processing , 2011 .

[13]  Martin H. Fischer,et al.  Reading space into numbers – a cross-linguistic comparison of the SNARC effect , 2008, Cognition.

[14]  A. Dowker.  Individual Differences in Arithmetic , 2012 .

[15]  M. H. Fischer,et al.  It takes just one word to quash a SNARC. , 2009, Experimental psychology.

[16]  Martin H. Fischer,et al.  How to cook a SNARC: Number placement in text rapidly changes spatial–numerical associations , 2010, Brain and Cognition.

[17]  J. Opfer,et al.  How Numbers Bias Preschoolers’ Spatial Search , 2011 .