Evaluation and biopsy of recurrent rectal cancer using three-dimensional endosonography

PURPOSE: The value of endorectal ultrasonography for postoperative follow-up of rectal cancer is limited by the inability to distinguish recurrent malignancy from benign lesions,e.g., fibrotic tissue. This study was conducted to investigate the role of three-dimensional (3D) endosonography for evaluation and biopsy of recurrent rectal cancer. METHODS: Endorectal ultrasonography was performed in routine follow-up program after resection of rectal cancer. 3D volume scans were recorded using a bifocal multiplane 3D transducer (7.5/10 MHz) with a 100‡ longitudinal and a 360‡ transversal scan angle. For transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of pararectal lesions, a specially designed targeting device was attached to the endoprobe. RESULTS: Overall pararectal lesions were detected in 28 of 163 patients (17 percent) who were undergoing endorectal ultrasonography for follow-up after resection of rectal cancer. 3D image analysis facilitated assessment of suspicious pararectal lesions by contemporary display of three perpendicular scan planes or volume reconstructions of the scanned area. Ultrasound-guided biopsy was performed in all 28 patients with pararectal lesions identified by endorectal ultrasonography. Biopsy revealed recurrent disease or lymph node metastases in seven and two patients, respectively. Benign lesions explained the endosonographic findings in 17 patients. All patients with benign histology still have no evidence of recurrent disease after a median follow-up of seven months. Nonrepresentative material was obtained in only 2 of 28 patients (accuracy, 93 percent). Histology changed the endosonographic diagnosis in 28 percent of cases. CONCLUSIONS: 3D endosonography with ultrasound-guided biopsy improves the diagnosis of extramural recurrence after curative resection of rectal cancer. 3D image display allows precise control of the position of the biopsy needle within the target.

[1]  G. Vallone,et al.  Intrarectal ultrasound and computed tomography in the pre‐ and postoperative assessment of patients with rectal cancer , 1985, The British journal of surgery.

[2]  U. Herzog,et al.  How accurate is endorectal ultrasound in the preoperative staging of rectal cancer? , 1993, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[3]  K. Hergan,et al.  Inoperable recurrent rectal cancer: results of a prospective trial with radiation therapy and razoxane. , 1994, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  S. Wilson,et al.  A new regional perfusion system , 1970, Journal of surgical oncology.

[5]  S Stipa,et al.  Local recurrence after curative resection for colorectal cancer: Frequency, risk factors and treatment , 1991, Journal of surgical oncology. Supplement.

[6]  P. Fockens,et al.  Assessment of tumor infiltration depth in rectal cancer with transrectal sonography: caution is necessary. , 1994, Radiology.

[7]  P. Tartter,et al.  Multivariate analysis of recurrence after anterior resection for colorectal carcinoma. , 1989, American journal of surgery.

[8]  G. Mallarini,et al.  Experience with local rectal cancer excision in light of two recent preoperative diagnostic methods , 1987, Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.

[9]  L. Strauss,et al.  Scar or recurrent rectal cancer. Positron emission tomography is more helpful for diagnosis than immunoscintigraphy. , 1989, Archives of surgery.

[10]  J. Virjee,et al.  Preoperative assessment of mesorectal lymph node involvement in rectal cancer , 1989, The British journal of surgery.

[11]  S. Pollard,et al.  Surgery for recurrent colorectal carcinoma--is it worthwhile? , 1989, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[12]  J. Christiansen,et al.  Rate and treatment of pelvic recurrence after abdominoperineal resection and low anterior resection for rectal cancer , 1995, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[13]  W Steinbrich,et al.  Recurrent rectal cancer: diagnosis with MR imaging versus CT. , 1988, Radiology.

[14]  P. Freeny,et al.  Colorectal carcinoma evaluation with CT: preoperative staging and detection of postoperative recurrence. , 1986, Radiology.

[15]  Y. M. Chen,et al.  Recurrent colorectal carcinoma: evaluation with barium enema examination and CT. , 1987, Radiology.

[16]  R. McLeod,et al.  Endoluminal transrectal ultrasonography: Accuracy, reliability, and validity , 1993, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[17]  J. Virjee,et al.  The detection and evaluation of locally recurrent rectal cancer with rectal endosonography , 1989, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[18]  F. Herbst,et al.  Local recurrence of colorectal cancer: Effect of early detection and aggressive surgery , 1986, The British journal of surgery.

[19]  J. Mecklin,et al.  Follow-up of patients operated on for colorectal carcinoma. , 1990, American journal of surgery.

[20]  P. Schlag,et al.  Influence of endorectal ultrasound on surgical treatment of rectal cancer. , 1990, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[21]  E E de Lange,et al.  Suspected recurrent rectosigmoid carcinoma after abdominoperineal resection: MR imaging and histopathologic findings. , 1989, Radiology.

[22]  P. Sugarbaker,et al.  A simplified plan for follow-up of patients with colon and rectal cancer supported by prospective studies of laboratory and radiologic test results. , 1987, Surgery.

[23]  V. Fazio,et al.  Preoperative biopsy of pararectal lymph nodes in rectal cancer using endoluminal ultrasonography , 1994, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[24]  L. Vannucci,et al.  Local recurrence after curative resection of colorectal adenocarcinoma. , 1990, Surgery.