Review: Sustainability of crossbreeding in developing countries; definitely not like crossing a meadow….

Crossbreeding, considering either terminal or rotational crossing, synthetic breed creation or breed replacement, is often promoted as an efficient strategy to increase farmers' income through the improvement of productivity of local livestock in developing countries. Sustainability of crossbreeding is however frequently challenged by constraints such as poor adaptation to the local environment or lack of logistic support. In this review, we investigate factors that may influence the long-term success or the failure of crossbreeding programs, based on the scientific literature and country reports submitted for The Second Report on the State of the World's Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Crossbreeding activities vary widely across species and countries. Its sustainability is dependent on different prerequisites such as continual access to adequate breeding stock (especially after the end of externally funded crossbreeding projects), the opportunity of improved livestock to express their genetic potential (e.g. through providing proper inputs) and integration within a reliable market chain. As formal crossbreeding programs are often associated with adoption of other technologies, they can be a catalyst for innovation and development for smallholders. Given the increasing global demand for animal products, as well as the potential environmental consequences of climate change, there is a need for practical research to improve the implementation of long-term crossbreeding programs in developing countries.

[1]  Tri Tri Satya Mastuti Widi,et al.  Mapping the impact of crossbreeding in smallholder cattle systems in Indonesia , 2015 .

[2]  J. Sölkner,et al.  Smallholder experiences with dairy cattle crossbreeding in the tropics: from introduction to impact. , 2015, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[3]  M. Rothschild,et al.  Genomic adaptation of admixed dairy cattle in East Africa , 2014, Front. Genet..

[4]  J. V. van Arendonk,et al.  Breeding programs for smallholder sheep farming systems: I. Evaluation of alternative designs of breeding schemes. , 2014, Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie.

[5]  T. Meuwissen,et al.  Selection strategies utilizing genetic resources to adapt livestock to climate change , 2014 .

[6]  T. Sonstegard,et al.  Genome-wide analysis reveals the ancient and recent admixture history of East African Shorthorn Zebu from Western Kenya , 2014, Heredity.

[7]  A. Zijpp,et al.  White Gold : Opportunities for Dairy Sector Development Collaboration in East Africa , 2014 .

[8]  Gemma G. R. Murray,et al.  Genetic susceptibility to infectious disease in East African Shorthorn Zebu: a genome-wide analysis of the effect of heterozygosity and exotic introgression , 2013, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[9]  J. Sölkner,et al.  Cross-breeding cattle for milk production in the tropics: achievements, challenges and opportunities , 2013 .

[10]  I. Hoffmann Adaptation to climate change--exploring the potential of locally adapted breeds. , 2013, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[11]  A. Mohanty,et al.  Characterization of smallholder pig production system: productive and reproductive performances of local and crossbred pigs in Sikkim Himalayan region , 2013, Tropical Animal Health and Production.

[12]  Md. Abdul Quddus,et al.  Adoption of dairy farming technologies by small farm holders: practices and constraints , 2013 .

[13]  A. Kumaresan,et al.  Artificial insemination of pigs reared under smallholder production system in northeastern India: success rate, genetic improvement, and monetary benefit , 2013, Tropical Animal Health and Production.

[14]  D. Otieno Market and Non-market Factors Influencing Farmers' Adoption of Improved Beef Cattle in Arid and Semi-Arid Areas of Kenya , 2012 .

[15]  A. V. Zárate,et al.  Development of organisation and planning in animal breeding: I. A review on breeding organisation , 2012 .

[16]  M. Peixoto,et al.  Dairy cattle genetics and its applications in Brazil , 2012 .

[17]  M. Tixier-Boichard,et al.  Gene diversity, agroecological structure and introgression patterns among village chicken populations across North, West and Central Africa , 2012, BMC Genetics.

[18]  B. Gebremedhin,et al.  Marketing value-chain of smallholder sheep and goats in crop-livestock mixed farming system of Alaba, Southern Ethiopia , 2011 .

[19]  J. Ojango,et al.  Practical crossbreeding for improved livelihoods in developing countries: The FARM Africa goat project☆ , 2011 .

[20]  K. Marshall,et al.  Pro-poor animal improvement and breeding — What can science do? ☆ , 2011 .

[21]  B. Kinghorn,et al.  Marker-based selection within smallholder production systems in developing countries , 2011 .

[22]  D. Baker,et al.  Demand for livestock products in developing countries with a focus on quality and safety attributes: Evidence from case studies , 2010 .

[23]  A. V. Zárate,et al.  Breeding and supply chain systems incorporating local pig breeds for small-scale pig producers in Northwest Vietnam , 2010 .

[24]  Nguyen Ngoc Luan,et al.  Estimating willingness to pay for quality and safety attributes of pork: Some empirical evidence from northern Vietnam , 2010 .

[25]  A. Costales Livestock sector development, economic growth, and poverty reduction , 2010 .

[26]  B. Kelay,et al.  Dairy technology adoption in smallholder farms in “Dejen” district, Ethiopia , 2010, Tropical Animal Health and Production.

[27]  I. Hoffmann The global plan of action for animal genetic resources and the conservation of poultry genetic resources , 2009 .

[28]  M. Hassan,et al.  Productive and reproductive performance of crossbred and indigenous Dairy cows under rural conditions in Comilla, Bangladesh , 2008 .

[29]  J. Pattison,et al.  The cost of conserving livestock diversity? Incentive measures and conservation options for maintaining indigenous Pelón pigs in Yucatan, Mexico , 2007, Tropical Animal Health and Production.

[30]  A. V. Zárate,et al.  Evaluation of biological and economic efficiency of smallholder pig production systems in North Vietnam , 2007, Tropical Animal Health and Production.

[31]  H. Burrow Utilization of diverse breed resources for tropical beef production. , 2006 .

[32]  Awudu Abdulai,et al.  The Diffusion of New Agricultural Technologies: The Case of Crossbred‐Cow Technology in Tanzania , 2005 .

[33]  G. B. Havenstein,et al.  Carcass composition and yield of 1957 versus 2001 broilers when fed representative 1957 and 2001 broiler diets. , 2003, Poultry science.

[34]  W. R. Thorpe,et al.  Smallholder dairy systems in the Kenya highlands: breed preferences and breeding practices , 2003 .

[35]  B. Rischkowsky,et al.  Crossbreds did not generate more net benefits than indigenous goats in Ethiopian smallholdings , 2003 .

[36]  J. Sölkner,et al.  Performance of crossbred and indigenous sheep under village conditions in the cool highlands of central-northern Ethiopia: growth, birth and body weights , 2002 .

[37]  K. Agyemang,et al.  Genetic improvement in medium to low- input systems of animal production- experiences to date: the West African experience. , 2002 .

[38]  J. Rege,et al.  Economic Analysis of Crossbreeding Programmes in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Conceptual Framework and Kenyan Case Study , 2001 .

[39]  W. R. Thorpe,et al.  Smallholder dairy production and marketing—Opportunities and constraints , 2001 .

[40]  J. King,et al.  Do smallholder farmers benefit more from crossbred (Somali X Anglo-Nubian) than from indigenous goats? , 2000 .

[41]  W. Kebede Do smallholder farmers benefit more from crossbred (Somali x Anglo-Nubian) than from indigenous goats? , 2000 .

[42]  I. Kosgey,et al.  Influence of production circumstances and economic evaluation criteria on economic comparison of breeds and breed crosses. , 1998, Journal of dairy science.