Effect of Employment Site Characteristics on Commute Mode Choice

Considerable effort has been made in recent years to resolve traffic congestion problems in metropolitan areas. The effects of employment site characteristics on commuting mode choice in the metropolitan area of Haifa, Israel, were studied. The analysis is based on trip diary data that included 4,794 commuting trips. In the first part of the investigation, the effect of different types of employment site on commuting mode choice was studied through aggregate analysis. In the second part, a four-mode multinomial model was developed. The results show a high rate of commuting by private vehicles in which the commuter is the driver. Commuters who have access to a private car are most likely to use it. High rates of commuting by bus are reported to employment sites located near the metropolitan central business district, local business employment sites, and areas with a high frequency of bus services. High rates of commuting by employer-provided transport were identified to suburban sites, industry sites, and areas with a low frequency of bus service. The research concludes that although automobile availability is the most important factor in mode choice, some employment site variables also have significant explanatory power.

[1]  Susan L Handy,et al.  METHODOLOGIES FOR EXPLORING THE LINK BETWEEN URBAN FORM AND TRAVEL BEHAVIOR , 1996 .

[2]  Shuming Yan,et al.  TRANSIT-BASED APPROACH TO LAND USE DESIGN , 1992 .

[3]  Ruth L. Steiner,et al.  RESIDENTIAL DENSITY AND TRAVEL PATTERNS: REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE , 1994 .

[4]  Shing Chung Josh Wong,et al.  The advantages of a high density, mixed land use, linear urban development , 1997 .

[5]  Z Andrew Farkas,et al.  REVERSE COMMUTING: PROSPECTS FOR JOB ACCESSIBILITY AND ENERGY CONSERVATION , 1992 .

[6]  Susan L Handy,et al.  Urban Form and Pedestrian Choices: Study of Austin Neighborhoods , 1996 .

[7]  Ryuichi Kitamura,et al.  LAND USE AND TRAVEL BEHAVIOR. , 1994 .

[8]  Wilbur S. Smith,et al.  Mass Transport for High‐Rise High‐Density Living , 1984 .

[9]  P. Mokhtarian,et al.  WHAT HAPPENS WHEN MOBILITY-INCLINED MARKET SEGMENTS FACE ACCESSIBILITY-ENHANCING POLICIES? , 1998 .

[10]  Stephen Gordon,et al.  EFFECT OF NEOTRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN ON TRAVEL CHARACTERISTICS , 1994 .

[11]  Wayne Berman,et al.  Travel demand management in the USA : context, lessons learned and future directions , 1997 .

[12]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  WORK TRAVEL MODE CHOICE AND NUMBER OF NON-WORK COMMUTE STOPS , 1997 .

[13]  R. Cervero.  America's Suburban Centers: The Land Use-Transportation Link , 1989 .

[14]  R. Cervero,et al.  COMMUTING IN TRANSIT VERSUS AUTOMOBILE NEIGHBORHOODS , 1995 .

[15]  J. Suhrbier,et al.  The effects of land use and travel demand management strategies on commuting behavior , 1995 .

[16]  L. Frank,et al.  Impacts of Mixed Use and Density on Utilization of Three Modes of Travel: Single-Occupant Vehicle, Transit, and Walking , 1994 .