Despite the increasing numbers of genetic assistants (GAs) in the genomics workforce, their training needs and how to best prepare GAs for their role have not been well defined. We sought to identify the current educational status of GAs, opinions on their training needs, and attitudes about GA training programs (GATPs). Survey links were emailed to NSGC members, 17 state genetic counseling (GC) professional organizations, and genomic medicine researchers. Respondents (n = 411) included GCs (n = 231) and GAs (n = 136). Like other studies, we found that the GA position is filled by a range of education levels and career aspirations. Most respondents supported the creation of GATPs, with 63% endorsing that GATPs would be helpful and half endorsing a short-term (3 months or less) program. Most believed GATPs should focus on general knowledge, with almost all practical skills learned on-the-job. If more GATPs are created, our survey provides evidence that graduates would be hired. Indeed, of those whose work setting required a bachelor's degree, the number of respondents who favored keeping that requirement was similar to the number who favored hiring a GA without a degree if they attended a GATP. However, there were concerns about GATPs. Many (44%) believed creating GATPs could discourage candidates from becoming GAs. We observed that there are two types of GAs: entry-level and bachelor's-level, with the entry-level being those who do not have and are not working to obtain a bachelor's degree and the bachelor's-level being those who do/are. GATPs could focus on the education of entry-level GAs, while gaps in the knowledge base of bachelor's-level GAs could be addressed by augmenting bachelor's curriculum or providing additional training after hire. Further research on the training needs of GAs and hiring practices of institutions will be vital to understanding their training needs and designing and implementing effective GATPs.
[1]
K. McWalter,et al.
Clinical and laboratory genetic counseling assistants: Comparing background experiences, responsibilities, satisfaction, and career goals
,
2023,
Journal of genetic counseling.
[2]
J. N. Hartley,et al.
Insights into genetic assistant practice and the workforce in North America
,
2023,
Journal of genetic counseling.
[3]
Stephanie A Cohen,et al.
Adding a genetic counseling assistant improves efficiency of hereditary cancer genetic counseling without impacting patient experience
,
2023,
Journal of genetic counseling.
[4]
J. Fitzpatrick,et al.
Perspective on the future of genetic counseling assistants - Should it be a steppingstone or a stand-alone career?
,
2022,
Molecular genetics and metabolism.
[5]
J. N. Hartley,et al.
Integrating genetic assistants into the workforce: An 18‐year productivity analysis and development of a staff mix planning tool
,
2022,
Journal of genetic counseling.
[6]
A. Mitchell,et al.
The current state of genetic counseling assistants in the United States
,
2019,
Journal of genetic counseling.
[7]
B. Frogner,et al.
Occupational mobility among individuals in entry‐level healthcare jobs in the USA
,
2018,
Journal of advanced nursing.
[8]
P. Brysiewicz,et al.
A hands-on guide to doing content analysis
,
2017,
African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence.
[9]
Mariette Bengtsson,et al.
How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis
,
2016
.