Performance and Design of LVL Walls Coupled with UFP Dissipaters

This article presents recent research on the seismic resistance of coupled post-tensioned timber walls for use in multi-story buildings. The walls are constructed from laminated veneer lumber (LVL), post-tensioned with unbonded vertical tendons, and coupled together with mild steel U-shaped flexural plates (UFPs) as energy dissipating elements. The timber wall design follows the same principles as used for post-tensioned precast concrete wall systems, using U-shaped plates to obtain a “hybrid” system, where energy is dissipated through yielding of the plates, while the vertical post-tensioning provides the restoring force. In this project, the same principles are applied to timber coupled walls. A series of quasi-static cyclic and pseudo-dynamic tests have been carried out to verify the applicability of the concept and the feasibility of the construction technology in timber buildings. The U-shaped plates showed stable energy dissipation characteristics and, in combination with the post-tensioning, desirable re-centering hysteretic behavior typically referred to as “flag-shape”. Because of the simplicity of these elements and the low cost of implementation, they have good prospects for practical application.

[1]  A. Buchanan,et al.  Experimental investigations on LVL seismic resistant wall and frame subassemblies , 2006 .

[2]  Alessandro Palermo,et al.  Seismic design of multi-storey buildings using Laminated Veneer Lumber (LVL) , 2005 .

[3]  Alessandro Palermo,et al.  Seismic response of hybrid-LVL coupled walls under quasi-static and pseudo-dynamic testing , 2007 .

[4]  Stephen A. Mahin,et al.  Pseudodynamic Method for Seismic Testing , 1985 .

[5]  Alessandro Palermo,et al.  Section Analysis and Cyclic Behavior of Post-Tensioned Jointed Ductile Connections for Multi-Story Timber Buildings , 2008 .

[6]  Alessandro Palermo,et al.  Multi-Storey Prestressed Timber Buildings in New Zealand , 2008 .

[7]  Faris Albermani,et al.  Dynamic response of flexibly jointed frames , 1995 .

[8]  STEFANO PAMPANIN,et al.  ANALYTICAL MODELLING OF THE SEISMIC BEHAVIOUR OF PRECAST CONCRETE FRAMES DESIGNED WITH DUCTILE CONNECTIONS , 2001 .

[9]  Sri Sritharan,et al.  Preliminary results and conclusions from the PRESSS five-story precast concrete test Building , 1999 .

[10]  Yahya C. Kurama,et al.  Posttensioned Hybrid Coupled Walls under Lateral Loads , 2004 .

[11]  M. J. Nigel Priestley,et al.  Overview of PRESSS Research Program , 1991 .

[12]  Alessandro Palermo,et al.  EFFICIENCY OF SIMPLIFIED ALTERNATIVE MODELLING APPROACHES TO PREDICT THE SEISMIC RESPONSE OF PRECAST CONCRETE HYBRID SYSTEMS , 2005 .

[13]  Andre Filiatrault,et al.  Posttensioned Energy Dissipating Connections for Moment-Resisting Steel Frames , 2002 .

[14]  Helmut Krawinkler,et al.  Theory and application of experimental model analysis in earthquake engineering , 1981 .

[15]  Alessandro Palermo,et al.  Use of “Controlled rocking” in the Seismic Design of Bridges , 2004 .

[16]  John F. Stanton,et al.  A HYBRID REINFORCED PRECAST FRAME FOR SEISMIC REGIONS , 1997 .

[17]  Arturo E. Schultz,et al.  SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF CONNECTIONS IN PRECAST CONCRETE WALLS , 1996 .

[18]  M. Fragiacomo,et al.  “Long-term behavior of prestressed LVL members. I: Experimental tests.” , 2011 .