Simulations of directed energy comet deflection

Earth-crossing asteroids and comets pose a long-term hazard to life and property on Earth. Schemes to mitigate the impact threat have been studied extensively but tend to focus on asteroid diversion while neglecting the possibility of a comet threat. Such schemes often demand physically intercepting the target by spacecraft, a task feasible only for targets identified decades in advance in a restricted range of orbits. A threatening comet is unlikely to satisfy these criteria and so necessitates a fundamentally different approach for diversion. Comets are naturally perturbed from purely gravitational trajectories through solar heating of their surfaces which activates sublimation-driven jets. Artificial heating of a comet, such as by a high-powered laser array in Earth orbit, may supplement natural heating by the Sun to purposefully manipulate its path to avoid an impact. The effectiveness of any particular laser array for a given comet depends on the comet's heating response which varies dramatically depending on factors including nucleus size, orbit and dynamical history. These factors are incorporated into a numerical orbital model using established models of nongravitational perturbations to evaluate the effectiveness and feasibility of using high-powered laser arrays in Earth orbit or on the ground to deflect a variety of comets. Simulation results suggest that orbital arrays of 500m and 10GW operating for 10 min=d over 1 yr may be adequate for mitigating impacts by comets up to ~500m in diameter. Continuously operating ground-based arrays of 100m and 10GW may be similarly effective when appropriately located.

[1]  Massimiliano Vasile,et al.  On the deflection of asteroids with mirrors , 2010 .

[2]  Donald K. Yeomans,et al.  Comparing the Earth Impact Flux from Comets and Near-Earth Asteroids , 2013 .

[3]  D. K. Yeomans,et al.  Cometary Orbit Determination and Nongravitational Forces , 2005 .

[4]  P. Lubin A Roadmap to Interstellar Flight , 2016, 1604.01356.

[5]  Greg Kopp,et al.  The Total Irradiance Monitor (TIM): Science Results , 2005 .

[6]  Gary J. Rottman,et al.  The Solar Radiation and Climate Experiment (SORCE) , 2005 .

[7]  Gary B. Hughes,et al.  Toward directed energy planetary defense , 2014 .

[8]  Colin R. McInnes,et al.  Deflection of near-Earth asteroids by kinetic energy impacts from retrograde orbits , 2004 .

[9]  B. Marsden Comets and Nongravitational Forces. III , 1968 .

[10]  Jesse D. Koenig,et al.  Impact Deflection of Potentially Hazardous Asteroids Using Current Launch Vehicles , 2007 .

[11]  P. J. Francis,et al.  The Demographics of Long-Period Comets , 2005, astro-ph/0509074.

[12]  A. Delsemme,et al.  Physico-chemical phenomena in comets—III: The continuum of comet Burnham (1960 II) , 1971 .

[13]  Martin Beech,et al.  The Potential Danger to Space Platforms from Meteor Storm Activity , 1995 .

[14]  D. C. Hyland,et al.  A permanently-acting NEA damage mitigation technique via the Yarkovsky effect , 2010 .

[15]  S. Chesley,et al.  TRAJECTORY ANALYSIS FOR THE NUCLEUS AND DUST OF COMET C/2013 A1 (SIDING SPRING) , 2014, 1404.4640.

[16]  Ole Tange,et al.  GNU Parallel: The Command-Line Power Tool , 2011, login Usenix Mag..

[17]  Eugene M. Shoemaker,et al.  Asteroid and comet flux in the neighborhood of the earth , 1988 .

[18]  Massimiliano Vasile,et al.  Concepts for near-Earth asteroid deflection using spacecraft with advanced nuclear and solar electric propulsion systems , 2005 .

[19]  Gary B. Hughes,et al.  Orbital Simulations on Deflecting Near-Earth Objects by Directed Energy , 2016, 1601.03690.

[20]  William Kahan,et al.  Composition constants for raising the orders of unconventional schemes for ordinary differential equations , 1997, Math. Comput..

[21]  Piet Hut,et al.  Threat Mitigation: The Gravity Tractor , 2006 .