Discovering words in the continuous speech stream: the role of prosody

Abstract Finding words in sentences is made difficult by the absence of obvious acoustic markers at word boundaries, such as silent pauses. Recent experimental evidence suggests that both adults and infants are able to use prosodic boundary cues on-line to constrain lexical access. French adults performing a word detection task were slowed down by local lexical ambiguities within phonological phrases but not across a phonological phrase boundary (Christophe, Peperkamp, Pallier, Block, & Mehler, J. Mem. Language (in revision)). Thirteen-month-old American infants who were trained to turn their heads upon hearing a bisyllabic word, such as ‘paper’, in a variant of the conditioned head-turning paradigm, responded more often to sentences that contained the target word than to sentences containing both its syllables separated by a phonological phrase boundary (Gout, Christophe, & Morgan, J. Mem. Language (in revision)). Taken together, these results suggest that both French adults and 13-month-old American infants perceive phonological phrase boundaries as natural word boundaries, and that they do not attempt lexical access on pairs of syllables which span such a boundary. We discuss the potential generalization of these results to other languages, the universality of prosodic boundary cues as well as their use in on-line syntactic analysis and syntax acquisition.

[1]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  When prosody fails to cue syntactic structure: 9-month-olds' sensitivity to phonological versus syntactic phrases , 1994, Cognition.

[2]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Competition and segmentation in spoken word recognition , 1994, ICSLP.

[3]  L. Gerken,et al.  An electrophysiological study of infants' sensitivity to the sound patterns of English speech. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[4]  Taehong Cho,et al.  Domain-initial articulatory strengthening in four languages , 2003 .

[5]  Ann M. Peters,et al.  The Units of Language Acquisition , 1983 .

[6]  Hugo Queué.  Durational cues for word segmentation Dutch , 1992 .

[7]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Clauses are perceptual units for young infants , 1987, Cognition.

[8]  A. Rietveld,et al.  Word Boundaries in the French Language , 1980 .

[9]  Eric Wanner,et al.  Language acquisition: the state of the art , 1982 .

[10]  Shrikanth S. Narayanan,et al.  Phrasal signatures in articulation , 2000 .

[11]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Two-month-old infants’ sensitivity to allophonic differences , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  J. Mehler,et al.  Perception of Prosodic Boundary Correlates by Newborn Infants. , 2001, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[13]  J. Mehler,et al.  Do infants perceive word boundaries? An empirical study of the bootstrapping of lexical acquisition. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Infants' sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in the native language. , 1994 .

[15]  Sven L Mattys,et al.  Stress versus coarticulation: toward an integrated approach to explicit speech segmentation. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Infants’ sensitivity to allophonic cues for word segmentation , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  Colin W. Wightman,et al.  Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  William J. Hardcastle,et al.  Some phonetic and syntactic constraints on lingual coarticulation during /kl/ sequences , 1985, Speech Commun..

[19]  James L. Morgan,et al.  Signal to Syntax: An Overview , 1996 .

[20]  V. Pasdeloup.  Modèle de règles rythmiques du français appliqué à la synthèse de la parole , 1990 .

[21]  M. Kjelgaard,et al.  Prosodic Facilitation and Interference in the Resolution of Temporary Syntactic Closure Ambiguity , 1999 .

[22]  Competition in spoken word recognition: Spotting words in other words , 1994 .

[23]  Angelien Sanderman,et al.  On the perceptual strength of prosodic boundaries and its relation to suprasegmental cues , 1994 .

[24]  Anne Christophe,et al.  Selecting word order: the Rhytmic Activation Principle , 1996 .

[25]  Elisabeth Delais-Roussarie,et al.  Pour une approche parallèle de la structure prosodique : étude de l'organisation prosodique et rythmique de la phrase française , 1995 .

[26]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  A moment of silence: How the prosodic cues in motherese might assist language learning , 1986 .

[27]  James L. Morgan,et al.  Signal to syntax : bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition , 1996 .

[28]  LouAnn Gerken,et al.  Signal to syntax : bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition , 1996 .

[29]  Anne Christophe Teresa Guasti Marina Nespor.  Reflections on Phonological Bootstrapping: Its Role for Lexical and Syntactic Acquisition , 1997 .

[30]  C. Laeufer,et al.  Phonology and Phonetic Evidence: Papers in Laboratory Phonology IV , 1995 .

[31]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Phonotactic and Prosodic Effects on Word Segmentation in Infants , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[32]  A Cutler,et al.  The perception of rhythm and word boundaries in noise-masked speech. , 1989, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[33]  Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al.  A prosody tutorial for investigators of auditory sentence processing , 1996, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[34]  Robert F. Port,et al.  Meter and speech , 2003, J. Phonetics.

[35]  U. Kleinhenz.  Interfaces in Phonology , 1996 .

[36]  A. Woodward,et al.  Perception of acoustic correlates of major phrasal units by young infants , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[37]  P. Keating,et al.  Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  A. Christophea,et al.  Phonological phrase boundaries constrain lexical access I . Adult data q , 2003 .

[39]  Peter Howell,et al.  Perceptual centers in speech: An acoustic analysis , 1992 .

[40]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Infants′ Sensitivity to the Sound Patterns of Native Language Words , 1993 .

[41]  L. Nakatani,et al.  Hearing "words" without words: prosodic cues for word perception. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  E. Grabe,et al.  Prosody, phonology and parsing in closure ambiguities , 1995 .

[43]  John Kingston,et al.  Papers in Laboratory Phonology: Index of names , 1990 .

[44]  A. Friederici,et al.  Phonotactic knowledge of word boundaries and its use in infant speech perception , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[45]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Infants′ Detection of the Sound Patterns of Words in Fluent Speech , 1995, Cognitive Psychology.

[46]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Infants' preference for the predominant stress patterns of English words. , 1993, Child development.

[47]  Elizabeth K. Johnson,et al.  Word Segmentation by 8-Month-Olds: When Speech Cues Count More Than Statistics , 2001 .

[48]  L. Gleitman.  The Structural Sources of Verb Meanings , 2020, Sentence First, Arguments Afterward.

[49]  Mary R. Newsome,et al.  The Beginnings of Word Segmentation in English-Learning Infants , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[50]  James L. Morgan,et al.  From Simple Input to Complex Grammar , 1986 .

[51]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The TRACE model of speech perception , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[52]  J. Mehler,et al.  Phonological phrase boundaries constrain lexical access II. Infant data , 2004 .

[53]  Kathy Hirsh-Pasek,et al.  A moment of silence: How the prosodic cues in motherese might assist language learning , 1986 .