Feasibility of using an organic substrate in a wetland system treating sewage sludge: Impact of plant species.

A vertical-flow wetland system was tested for treatment of liquid sludge with high organic concentrations using an organic substrate (peat/crushed pine bark, 1/1) as growing medium. Mesocosms (1 m(3)) were planted with either Phragmites australis Cav., Typha latifolia L., or Iris pseudacorus L. The aim of the work was to determine the feasibility of using an organic substrate in treatment wetlands, through the study of its temporal patterns and of its impact on the water output quality. Results confirmed that the organic substrate can be used in such wetlands treating highly organic sludge, without clogging phenomena for the experimental period. The organic substrate released soluble organic matter but few mineral elements. Over the experimental period, substrate TOC concentration did not change while N concentration increased. Plants showed positive impact on substrate temporal patterns and also on the outflow water quality. Overall, Phragmites seemed to be more beneficial than Typha and Iris.

[1]  J. Vymazal.  Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment , 2010 .

[2]  Peter A. Vanrolleghem,et al.  Constructed wetlands in Flanders: a performance analysis , 2004 .

[3]  Chris D. Metcalfe,et al.  Treatment of domestic wastewater in a pilot-scale natural treatment system in central Mexico , 2004 .

[4]  Y. Comeau,et al.  Influence of macrophyte species on microbial density and activity in constructed wetlands. , 2007, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[5]  Hans Brix,et al.  The use of vertical flow constructed wetlands for on-site treatment of domestic wastewater: New Danish guidelines , 2005 .

[6]  Guenter Langergraber,et al.  Bacterial carbon utilization in vertical subsurface flow constructed wetlands. , 2008, Water research.

[7]  S. Sayadi,et al.  Changes in microbial and soil properties following amendment with treated and untreated olive mill wastewater. , 2006, Microbiological research.

[8]  M G Healy,et al.  Treatment of dairy wastewater using constructed wetlands and intermittent sand filters. , 2007, Bioresource technology.

[9]  J. Coates,et al.  Microbial Interactions with Humic Substances1 , 2006 .

[10]  M. Scholz,et al.  Comparison of constructed reed beds with different filter media and macrophytes treating urban stream water contaminated with lead and copper , 2002 .

[11]  M. R. Vidal-Abarca,et al.  The performance of a multi-stage system of constructed wetlands for urban wastewater treatment in a semiarid region of SE Spain , 2001 .

[12]  D. Rousseau,et al.  Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment (I001868) , 2012 .

[13]  M. Greenway.  The role of constructed wetlands in secondary effluent treatment and water reuse in subtropical and arid Australia , 2005 .

[14]  P Kuschk,et al.  Root stimulated nitrogen removal: only a local effect or important for water treatment? , 2005, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[15]  Y. Comeau,et al.  Treatment of freshwater fish farm effluent using constructed wetlands: the role of plants and substrate. , 2003, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[16]  J. García-Gil,et al.  Effects of municipal waste compost and sewage sludge on proton binding behavior of humic acids from Portuguese sandy and clay loam soils. , 2008, Bioresource technology.

[17]  P. Prudent,et al.  Can vertical-flow wetland systems treat high concentrated sludge from a food industry? A mesocosm experiment testing three plant species , 2009 .

[18]  M. Beklioğlu,et al.  COMPARISON OF THE TREATMENT PERFORMANCES OF BLAST FURNACE SLAG-BASED AND GRAVEL-BASED VERTICAL FLOW WETLANDS OPERATED IDENTICALLY FOR DOMESTIC WASTEWATER TREATMENT IN TURKEY , 2005 .

[19]  Ü. Mander,et al.  The performance of peat-filled subsurface flow filters treating landfill leachate and municipal wastewater. , 2009 .

[20]  David Steer,et al.  A test of four plant species to reduce total nitrogen and total phosphorus from soil leachate in subsurface wetland microcosms. , 2004, Bioresource technology.

[21]  R. M. Goodman,et al.  Microbial response over time to hydrologic and fertilization treatments in a simulated wet prairie , 2006, Plant and Soil.

[22]  J. Coates,et al.  Microbial interactions with humic substances. , 2006, Advances in applied microbiology.

[23]  Rıdvan Kızılkaya,et al.  Effects of N-enriched sewage sludge on soil enzyme activities , 2005 .

[24]  J. García-Gil,et al.  Effects of sewage sludge amendment on humic acids and microbiological properties of a semiarid Mediterranean soil , 2004, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[25]  H. Brix.  Do macrophytes play a role in constructed treatment wetlands , 1997 .

[26]  P Kuschk,et al.  Effects of plants and microorganisms in constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. , 2003, Biotechnology advances.

[27]  J. G. Isebrands,et al.  Linking phytoremediated pollutant removal to biomass economic opportunities. , 2005 .

[28]  A Pressl,et al.  Evaluation of substrate clogging processes in vertical flow constructed wetlands. , 2003, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[29]  Klaus Mauch,et al.  Soil clogging in vertical flow reed beds – mechanisms, parameters, consequences and.......solutions? , 1997 .

[30]  H. Schulten,et al.  The chemistry of soil organic nitrogen: a review , 1997, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[31]  A. O. Rangel,et al.  Evaluation of different substrates to support the growth of Typha latifolia in constructed wetlands treating tannery wastewater over long-term operation. , 2008, Bioresource technology.

[32]  Dick B Janssen,et al.  Biocatalysis by dehalogenating enzymes. , 2007, Advances in applied microbiology.