Higher PEEP in Patients With Acute Lung Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Studies of ventilation strategies that included higher PEEP in patients with acute lung injury (ALI) or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) have yielded conflicting results. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether higher PEEP during volume-limited and pressure-limited ventilation is associated with 28-day mortality or barotrauma rates in patients with ALI/ARDS. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and the bibliographies of retrieved papers to identify randomized controlled trials that compared higher and lower PEEP in adult patients with ALI/ARDS who were already receiving volume-limited or pressure-limited ventilation. Two of us independently abstracted study-level data, including study design, patient characteristics, study methods, intervention, and main results. We pooled the study-level data with a random-effects model, unless heterogeneity was low (I2 < 50%), in which case we used a fixed-effects model. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. RESULTS: Four randomized trials (2,360 participants) were evaluated. Higher PEEP had a nonsignificant trend toward lower 28-day mortality (pooled relative risk 0.90, 95% CI 0.79–1.02). There was no difference in barotrauma between the 2 groups (pooled relative risk 1.17, 95% CI 0.90–1.52). Two studies reported an adjusted hospital death rate, and the pooled results of sensitivity analysis with those adjusted rates were identical to those of the unadjusted analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In 4 recent studies that used volume-limited or pressure-limited ventilation in ALI/ARDS patients, higher PEEP was not associated with significantly different short-term mortality or barotrauma. This study does not support the routine use of higher PEEP in patients with ALI/ARDS.

[1]  P. Parsons,et al.  Clinicians' approaches to mechanical ventilation in acute lung injury and ARDS. , 2001, Chest.

[2]  D. Altman,et al.  Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies , 2008 .

[3]  P. Pelosi,et al.  Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on regional distribution of tidal volume and recruitment in adult respiratory distress syndrome. , 1995, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[4]  L. Gattinoni,et al.  Refining ventilatory treatment for acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. , 2008, JAMA.

[5]  S. Jaber,et al.  Positive end-expiratory pressure setting in adults with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. , 2008, JAMA.

[6]  J. Vincent,et al.  Does a Higher Positive End Expiratory Pressure Decrease Mortality in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome?: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis , 2009, Anesthesiology.

[7]  D. Tierney,et al.  Experimental pulmonary edema due to intermittent positive pressure ventilation with high inflation pressures. Protection by positive end-expiratory pressure. , 2015, The American review of respiratory disease.

[8]  Michele Tarsilla Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2010, Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation.

[9]  François Lemaire,et al.  Relationship between ventilatory settings and barotrauma in the acute respiratory distress syndrome , 2002, Intensive Care Medicine.

[10]  Salvador Benito,et al.  Characteristics and outcomes in adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation: a 28-day international study. , 2002, JAMA.

[11]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Chapter 16: Special Topics in Statistics , 2008 .

[12]  Salvatore Grasso,et al.  Effects of high versus low positive end-expiratory pressures in acute respiratory distress syndrome. , 2005, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[13]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  A R Jadad,et al.  Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? , 1996, Controlled clinical trials.

[15]  J. Chiche,et al.  Screening of ARDS patients using standardized ventilator settings: influence on enrollment in a clinical trial , 2004, Intensive Care Medicine.

[16]  Arthur S Slutsky,et al.  Tidal ventilation at low airway pressures can augment lung injury. , 1994, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[17]  N. Laird,et al.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials. , 1986, Controlled clinical trials.

[18]  Arthur S Slutsky,et al.  PEEP or no PEEP--lung recruitment may be the solution. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  A S Slutsky,et al.  Lung injury caused by mechanical ventilation. , 1999, Chest.

[20]  J. Mead,et al.  Stress distribution in lungs: a model of pulmonary elasticity. , 1970, Journal of applied physiology.

[21]  Arthur S Slutsky,et al.  Ventilation strategy using low tidal volumes, recruitment maneuvers, and high positive end-expiratory pressure for acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. , 2008, JAMA.

[22]  L. Puybasset,et al.  Acute respiratory distress syndrome: Lessons from computed tomography of the whole lung , 2003, Critical care medicine.

[23]  Marek Ancukiewicz,et al.  Higher versus lower positive end-expiratory pressures in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  R. Kacmarek,et al.  Current definitions of acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome do not reflect their true severity and outcome , 1999, Intensive Care Medicine.

[25]  R Brian Haynes,et al.  Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound treatment studies in EMBASE. , 2006, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[26]  D. Dreyfuss,et al.  Ventilator-induced lung injury: lessons from experimental studies. , 1998, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[27]  Guillermo Bugedo,et al.  Lung recruitment in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  Matthias Briel,et al.  Higher vs lower positive end-expiratory pressure in patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2010, JAMA.

[29]  C. Begg,et al.  Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. , 1994, Biometrics.

[30]  Salvador Benito,et al.  Incidence, risk factors and outcome of barotrauma in mechanically ventilated patients , 2004, Intensive Care Medicine.

[31]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Special Topics in Statistics , 2008 .

[32]  Jesús Blanco,et al.  An early PEEP/FIO2 trial identifies different degrees of lung injury in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. , 2007, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[33]  王林,et al.  Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network , 2010 .

[34]  W. Haenszel,et al.  Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. , 1959, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[35]  P. Dorinsky,et al.  Diagnosis and therapy of acute respiratory distress syndrome in adults: an international survey. , 1996, Journal of critical care.

[36]  M. Lamy,et al.  The American-European Consensus Conference on ARDS. Definitions, mechanisms, relevant outcomes, and clinical trial coordination. , 1994, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[37]  D. Schoenfeld,et al.  Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[38]  E. Draper,et al.  APACHE II: A severity of disease classification system , 1985, Critical care medicine.

[39]  R. Brian Haynes,et al.  Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound studies in MEDLINE. , 1994, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[40]  Y. Oba,et al.  High levels of PEEP may improve survival in acute respiratory distress syndrome: A meta-analysis. , 2009, Respiratory medicine.

[41]  C. Putensen,et al.  Meta-analysis: Ventilation Strategies and Outcomes of the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Acute Lung Injury , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[42]  Alexander J Sutton,et al.  What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta-analysis of sparse data. , 2004, Statistics in medicine.

[43]  D. Altman,et al.  Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies , 2008 .

[44]  Diane P. Martin,et al.  Incidence and outcomes of acute lung injury. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[45]  Atul Malhotra,et al.  Mechanical ventilation guided by esophageal pressure in acute lung injury. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[46]  F. Jardin,et al.  Acute cor pulmonale in acute respiratory distress syndrome submitted to protective ventilation: Incidence, clinical implications, and prognosis , 2001, Critical care medicine.

[47]  W. Altemeier,et al.  Hyperoxia in the intensive care unit: why more is not always better , 2007, Current opinion in critical care.

[48]  I. Olkin,et al.  Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement , 1999, The Lancet.

[49]  I. Cheifetz,et al.  Optimal positive end-expiratory pressure: The search for the Holy Grail continues. , 2004, Critical Care Medicine.

[50]  P. Pelosi,et al.  Regional effects and mechanism of positive end-expiratory pressure in early adult respiratory distress syndrome. , 1993, JAMA.

[51]  Marco Moschetta,et al.  ARDSnet ventilatory protocol and alveolar hyperinflation: role of positive end-expiratory pressure. , 2007, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[52]  D. Needham,et al.  Ventilatory management of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. , 2005, JAMA.