Reducing radiation exposure using commonly available objects

ObjectivesOne and a half years have passed since the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant disaster. The environmental radiation dose rate was not critical, but an existing exposure situation has been identified in a large part of Fukushima Prefecture. Although people continue to live and work in the contaminated area, they are not provided with sufficient information to reduce their exposure to radiation by themselves. In this study, we attempt to evaluate the efficiency of radiation shielding by using everyday items widely available to people.MethodsNaI scintillation and Geiger–Müller survey meters were used to measure the radiation dose of (1) contaminated soil and (2) soil covered with commonly available items.ResultsIn the soil at a depth of 10 cm from the surface, the radiation dose rate decreased from 3.36 to 0.65 μSv/h, and the count rate decreased from 3,120 to 352 cpm. Both the radiation dose rate and count rate reduced when the soil was covered with everyday items, such as a magazine more than 20 mm thick, a polystyrene foam board, and a wooden board of the same thickness.ConclusionsTo protect residents from unnecessary radiation exposure in the existing exposure situation, covering contaminated soil with a wooden board or a magazine, either of them 20 mm thick, is useful to reduce the radiation dose.

[1]  J. Lochard Protection of people living in long-term contaminated areas after a nuclear accident: the guidance of ICRP Publication 111 , 2012, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[2]  A McGarry,et al.  ICRP Publication 111 - Application of the Commission's recommendations to the protection of people living in long-term contaminated areas after a nuclear accident or a radiation emergency. , 2009, Annals of the ICRP.

[3]  Masao Miyake,et al.  Differences in Rates of Decrease of Environmental Radiation Dose Rates by Ground Surface Property in Fukushima City After the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident , 2013, Health physics.

[4]  A. González The recommendations of the ICRP vis-à-vis the Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP accident aftermath. , 2012, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[5]  岩崎 民子 SOURCES AND EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATION : United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation UNSCEAR 2000 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes , 2002 .

[6]  Hiroshi Matsumura,et al.  Diffusion of Radioactive Materials from Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Obtained by Gamma-Ray Measurements on Expressways , 2011 .

[7]  T. Kakamu,et al.  An assessment of radiation doses at an educational institution 57.8 km away from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant 1 month after the nuclear accident , 2012, Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine.

[8]  M. Charles,et al.  UNSCEAR report 2000: sources and effects of ionizing radiation. United Nations Scientific Comittee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. , 2001, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[9]  K. Hayashi,et al.  Radiocesium and radioiodine in soil particles agitated by agricultural practices: field observation after the Fukushima nuclear accident. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.