More Problems After Difficult Problems? Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evidence for Sequential Difficulty Effects in Mental Arithmetic

This study investigated whether sequential difficulty effects emerge during processing of a mixed set of small, easy and large, more difficult arithmetic problems. Furthermore, we assessed if these sequential difficulty effects are reflected in event-related (de-)synchronization (ERS/ERD) patterns. To this end, we analyzed data of 65 participants, who solved two separate blocks (additions and subtractions) of arithmetic problems while their EEG was recorded. In each block, half of the problems were difficult problems (two-digit/two-digit with carry/borrow), and the other half were easy problems (one-digit/one-digit). Half of the problems were preceded by a problem of the same difficulty (repeat trials), and half were preceded by problems of the other difficulty (switch trials). In subtractions a sequential difficulty effects pattern emerged. Participants solved easy repeat trials faster than easy switch trials, while difficult repeat trials were solved slower and less accurately than difficult switch trials. In the EEG, we found the strongest effects in left hemispheric beta band (13–30 Hz) ERD. Specifically, participants showed a stronger beta band ERD in easy switch trials than in easy repeat trials. Furthermore, beta band ERD was stronger in difficult problems than in easy problems within repeat trials, but stronger in easy problems than in difficult problems within switch trials. In summary, our results are in line with the presence of sequential difficulty effects, as processing of easy and difficult problems was impaired if they were preceded by a difficult problem. Furthermore, these sequential difficulty effects are reflected in ERD patterns.

[1]  G. Lienert,et al.  Hand-Dominanz-Test , 1971 .

[2]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  Working memory, attention control, and the N-back task: a question of construct validity. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  Patrick Lemaire,et al.  Strategy switch costs in arithmetic problem solving , 2010, Memory & cognition.

[4]  Patrick Lemaire,et al.  The time course of strategy sequential difficulty effects: an ERP study in arithmetic , 2012, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  Jonathan W. Peirce,et al.  PsychoPy—Psychophysics software in Python , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[6]  Darryl W. Schneider,et al.  Asymmetric Switch Costs as Sequential Difficulty Effects , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  Ulrich Mayr,et al.  Task selection cost asymmetry without task switching , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  P. Lemaire,et al.  Strategy sequential difficulty effects vary with working-memory and response-stimulus-intervals: a study in arithmetic. , 2013, Acta psychologica.

[9]  Bert De Smedt,et al.  Neurophysiological evidence for the validity of verbal strategy reports in mental arithmetic , 2011, Biological Psychology.

[10]  Jamie I. D. Campbell,et al.  Asymmetrical language switching costs in Chinese–English bilinguals' number naming and simple arithmetic , 2005 .

[11]  J. Gray,et al.  PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy , 2019, Behavior Research Methods.

[12]  James Lani,et al.  Comprehensive Trail-Making Test (CTMT) , 2010 .

[13]  C. Dweck,et al.  Implicit Theories and Their Role in Judgments and Reactions: A Word From Two Perspectives , 1995 .

[14]  Roland H. Grabner,et al.  Oscillatory EEG Correlates of Arithmetic Strategies: A Training Study , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[15]  U. Kanning,et al.  NEO-Fünf-Faktoren-Inventar nach Costa und McCrae (NEO-FFI) , 2009 .

[16]  Martin Luessi,et al.  MNE software for processing MEG and EEG data , 2014, NeuroImage.

[17]  André Vandierendonck,et al.  The role of phonological and executive working memory resources in simple arithmetic strategies , 2007 .

[18]  Bert De Smedt,et al.  Oscillatory EEG correlates of arithmetic strategy use in addition and subtraction , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  Martin Luessi,et al.  MEG and EEG data analysis with MNE-Python , 2013, Front. Neuroinform..

[20]  Nadja Tschentscher,et al.  Frontal and Parietal Cortices Show Different Spatiotemporal Dynamics across Problem-solving Stages , 2016, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.