Enhancing genomic laboratory reports from the patients' view: A qualitative analysis

The purpose of this study was to develop a family genomic laboratory report designed to communicate genome sequencing results to parents of children who were participating in a whole genome sequencing clinical research study. Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with parents of children who participated in a whole genome sequencing clinical research study to address the elements, language and format of a sample family‐directed genome laboratory report. The qualitative interviews were followed by two focus groups aimed at evaluating example presentations of information about prognosis and next steps related to the whole genome sequencing result. Three themes emerged from the qualitative data: (i) Parents described a continual search for valid information and resources regarding their child's condition, a need that prior reports did not meet for parents; (ii) Parents believed that the Family Report would help facilitate communication with physicians and family members; and (iii) Parents identified specific items they appreciated in a genomics Family Report: simplicity of language, logical flow, visual appeal, information on what to expect in the future and recommended next steps. Parents affirmed their desire for a family genomic results report designed for their use and reference. They articulated the need for clear, easy to understand language that provided information with temporal detail and specific recommendations regarding relevant findings consistent with that available to clinicians.

[1]  Elaine Lyon,et al.  Clinician perspectives about molecular genetic testing for heritable conditions and development of a clinician-friendly laboratory report. , 2009, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[2]  Martin J. Packer,et al.  Entering the circle : hermeneutic investigation in psychology , 1989 .

[3]  Daniel Nilsson,et al.  An international effort towards developing standards for best practices in analysis, interpretation and reporting of clinical genome sequencing results in the CLARITY Challenge , 2014, Genome Biology.

[4]  Does it Run in the Family? , 1997, Nature Medicine.

[5]  David L. Rimoin,et al.  Principles and Practice of Medical Genetics , 1990 .

[6]  Anand S Dighe,et al.  Physician survey of a laboratory medicine interpretive service and evaluation of the influence of interpretations on laboratory test ordering. , 2004, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[7]  E. Hammond,et al.  Clinically relevant breast cancer reporting: using process measures to improve anatomic pathology reporting. , 1997, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[8]  I. Lipkus,et al.  Developing patient-friendly genetic and genomic test reports: formats to promote patient engagement and understanding , 2014, Genome Medicine.

[9]  Judy Wilson Acknowledging the expertise of patients and their organisations , 1999, BMJ.

[10]  Hammond Eh,et al.  Clinically relevant breast cancer reporting: using process measures to improve anatomic pathology reporting. , 1997 .

[11]  Ira M Lubin,et al.  A report template for molecular genetic tests designed to improve communication between the clinician and laboratory. , 2012, Genetic testing and molecular biomarkers.

[12]  D. Seibert,et al.  Twenty questions in genetic medicine—an assessment of World Wide Web databases for genetics information at the point of care , 2008, Genetics in Medicine.

[13]  Ira M. Lubin,et al.  Effective communication of molecular genetic test results to primary care providers , 2012, Genetics in Medicine.

[14]  Jeffrey A Sparks,et al.  Communicating genetic risk information for common disorders in the era of genomic medicine. , 2013, Annual review of genomics and human genetics.