Ultra-Low-Power Digital Filtering for Insulated EMG Sensing

Myoelectric prostheses help amputees to regain independence and a higher quality of life. These prostheses are controlled by state-of-the-art electromyography sensors, which use a conductive connection to the skin and are therefore sensitive to sweat. They are applied with some pressure to ensure a conductive connection, which may result in pressure marks and can be problematic for patients with circulatory disorders, who constitute a major group of amputees. Here, we present ultra-low-power digital signal processing algorithms for an insulated EMG sensor which couples the EMG signal capacitively. These sensors require neither conductive connection to the skin nor electrolytic paste or skin preparation. Capacitive sensors allow straightforward application. However, they make a sophisticated signal amplification and noise suppression necessary. A low-cost sensor has been developed for real-time myoelectric prostheses control. The major hurdles in measuring the EMG are movement artifacts and external noise. We designed various digital filters to attenuate this noise. Optimal system setup and filter parameters for the trade-off between attenuation of this noise and sufficient EMG signal power for high signal quality were investigated. Additionally, an algorithm for movement artifact suppression, enabling robust application in real-world environments, is presented. The algorithms, which require minimal calculation resources and memory, are implemented on an ultra-low-power microcontroller.

[1]  R.F. Weir,et al.  The Optimal Controller Delay for Myoelectric Prostheses , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[2]  Angkoon Phinyomark,et al.  Feature Extraction and Selection for Myoelectric Control Based on Wearable EMG Sensors , 2018, Sensors.

[3]  A. Boxtel,et al.  Optimal signal bandwidth for the recording of surface EMG activity of facial, jaw, oral, and neck muscles. , 2001 .

[4]  R. Sorrentino,et al.  Electronic Filter Simulation & Design , 2007 .

[5]  Sibylle B. Thies,et al.  The reality of myoelectric prostheses : understanding what makes , 2018 .

[6]  Malte Kirst Verbesserung der automatischen EKG-Analyse durch Hinzunahme von Kontextinformationen , 2012 .

[7]  W. E. Thomson Delay networks having maximally flat frequency characteristics , 1949 .

[8]  Shanette A. Go,et al.  Frequency analysis of lower extremity electromyography signals for the quantitative diagnosis of dystonia. , 2014, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[9]  Christopher Kormanyos Real-Time C++: Efficient Object-Oriented and Template Microcontroller Programming , 2013 .

[10]  Øyvind Stavdahl,et al.  A multi-modal approach for hand motion classification using surface EMG and accelerometers , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[11]  Mikhail Kuznetsov,et al.  Filtering the surface EMG signal: Movement artifact and baseline noise contamination. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  Guanglin Li,et al.  Selection of sampling rate for EMG pattern recognition based prosthesis control , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[13]  Erik J. Scheme,et al.  Selective Classification for Improved Robustness of Myoelectric Control Under Nonideal Conditions , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Richard W. Daniels,et al.  Approximation Methods for Electronic Filter Design: With Applications to Passive, Active and Digital Networks , 1974 .

[15]  Aidan D. Roche,et al.  Prosthetic Myoelectric Control Strategies: A Clinical Perspective , 2014, Current Surgery Reports.

[16]  Paolo Bifulco,et al.  A Piezoresistive Sensor to Measure Muscle Contraction and Mechanomyography , 2018, Sensors.

[17]  Arul A Review on Noises in EMG Signal and its Removal , 2017 .

[18]  Hai Hu,et al.  Application of Linear Discriminant Analysis in Dimensionality Reduction for Hand Motion Classification , 2012 .

[19]  Vladimir Medved,et al.  Standards for Reporting EMG Data , 2000, Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology.

[20]  Sebastian Amsuess,et al.  Signal evaluation of capacitive EMG for upper limb prostheses control using an ultra-low-power microcontroller , 2016, 2016 IEEE EMBS Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Sciences (IECBES).

[21]  F. Massey The Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Goodness of Fit , 1951 .

[22]  C. J. Luca,et al.  SURFACE ELECTROMYOGRAPHY : DETECTION AND RECORDING , 2022 .

[23]  defasagem eletromecânica,et al.  Smoothing EMG signals: Implications on delay , 2014 .

[24]  Sebastian Amsuess,et al.  Capacitively coupled EMG detection via ultra-low-power microcontroller STFT , 2017, 2017 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[25]  Alain Delisle,et al.  The effect of sampling frequency on EMG measures of occupational mechanical exposure. , 2005, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[26]  Joseph C Wenke,et al.  Characterisation and outcomes of upper extremity amputations. , 2014, Injury.

[27]  K. Kraning,et al.  Hydration characteristics and electrical resistivity of stratum corneum using a noninvasive four-point microelectrode method. , 1977, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[28]  M. A. C. García,et al.  Surface electromyography: Why, when and how to use it , 2011 .