Neural processes involved with perception of non-native durational contrasts

Neural processes underlying identification of durational contrasts were studied by comparing English and Japanese speakers for Japanese short/long vowel identification relative to consonant identification. Enhanced activities for non-native contrast (Japanese short/long vowel identification by English speakers) were observed in brain regions involved with articulatory–auditory mapping (Broca's area, superior temporal gyrus, planum temporale, and cerebellum), but not in the supramarginal gyrus. Greater activity in the supramarginal gyrus found for the consonant identification over short/long vowel identification by Japanese speakers implies that it is more important for phonetic contrasts differing in place of articulation than for vowel duration. These results support the hypothesis that neural processes used to facilitate perception depend on the relative contribution of information important for articulatory planning control.

[1]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Segregating Semantic from Phonological Processes during Reading , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  R. Wise,et al.  Sounds do-able: auditory–motor transformations and the posterior temporal plane , 2005, Trends in Neurosciences.

[3]  F H Guenther,et al.  Speech sound acquisition, coarticulation, and rate effects in a neural network model of speech production. , 1995, Psychological review.

[4]  J. Lurito,et al.  Neural circuitry underlying perception of duration depends on language experience , 2002, Brain and Language.

[5]  M. Lowe,et al.  A Cross-Linguistic fMRI Study of Spectral and Temporal Cues Underlying Phonological Processing , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  J. Trueswell,et al.  Cognitive control and parsing: Reexamining the role of Broca’s area in sentence comprehension , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[7]  J. Perkell,et al.  A Neural Model of Speech Production and Its Application to Studies of the Role of Auditory Feedback in Speech , 2003 .

[8]  T. Paus,et al.  Modulation of Motor Excitability during Speech Perception: The Role of Broca's Area , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  S. Bookheimer,et al.  Dissociating Neural Mechanisms of Temporal Sequencing and Processing Phonemes , 2003, Neuron.

[10]  F. Chollet,et al.  Differential fMRI Responses in the Left Posterior Superior Temporal Gyrus and Left Supramarginal Gyrus to Habituation and Change Detection in Syllables and Tones , 1999, NeuroImage.

[11]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: a first report. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  W. Grodd,et al.  Cerebellum and Speech Perception: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Optimization of experimental design in fMRI: a general framework using a genetic algorithm , 2003, NeuroImage.

[14]  Koichi Mori,et al.  Differential cortical responses in second language learners to different vowel contrasts , 2004, Neuroreport.

[15]  Pascal van Lieshout,et al.  Speech Motor Control in Normal and Disordered Speech: Future Developments in Theory and Methodology , 2004 .

[16]  M. Erb,et al.  Sensorimotor mapping of the human cerebellum: fMRI evidence of somatotopic organization , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[17]  M. Iacoboni,et al.  Listening to speech activates motor areas involved in speech production , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: IV. Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Jeffery A. Jones,et al.  Phonetic perceptual identification by native- and second-language speakers differentially activates brain regions involved with acoustic phonetic processing and those involved with articulatory–auditory/orosensory internal models , 2004, NeuroImage.

[20]  A. Liberman,et al.  An effect of linguistic experience: The discrimination of [r] and [l] by native speakers of Japanese and English , 1975 .

[21]  Shinobu Masaki,et al.  Learning-induced neural plasticity associated with improved identification performance after training of a difficult second-language phonetic contrast , 2003, NeuroImage.

[22]  T. Paus,et al.  Seeing and hearing speech excites the motor system involved in speech production , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  Robert J Zatorre,et al.  Learning new sounds of speech: reallocation of neural substrates , 2004, NeuroImage.

[24]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  The neural correlates of the verbal component of working memory , 1993, Nature.

[25]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Speech listening specifically modulates the excitability of tongue muscles: a TMS study , 2002, The European journal of neuroscience.

[26]  Gunnar Fant,et al.  Acoustic Theory Of Speech Production , 1960 .