Role of the Contralateral Inferior Frontal Gyrus in Recovery of Language Function in Poststroke Aphasia: A Combined Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Positron Emission Tomography Study

Background and Purpose— Functional neuroimaging studies have demonstrated right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) activation in poststroke aphasia. It remains unclear whether this activation is essential for language performance. We tested this hypothesis in a positron emission tomography (PET) activation study during a semantic task with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on right-handed patients experiencing poststroke aphasia and examined whether rTMS stimulation over the right and left IFG would interfere with language performance. Methods— Eleven patients with left-sided middle cerebral arterial infarction, 50 to 75 years of age, were tested with the Aachen Aphasia Test Battery and underwent 15O-H2O PET activation during a semantic task within 2 weeks after stroke. PET activation images were coregistered to T1-weighted MRIs. Stimulation sites were determined on renderings of head and brain over the maximum activation within left and right IFG. rTMS was performed with 20% maximum output (2.1 T), 10-s train duration, at 4Hz frequency. A positive rTMS effect was defined as an increased reaction time latency or error rate in the semantic task. Results— PET activations of the IFG were observed on the left (3 patients) and bilaterally (8 patients). Right IFG stimulation was positive in 5 patients with right IFG activation, indicating essential language function. In a verbal fluency task, these patients had a lower performance than patients without right-sided TMS effect. Conclusions— In some poststroke aphasics, right IFG activation is essential for residual language function. However, its compensatory potential seems to be less effective than in patients who recover left IFG function. These results suggest a hierarchy in recovery from poststroke aphasia and a (limited) compensatory potential of the nondominant hemisphere.

[1]  A. Thiel,et al.  Essential language function of the right hemisphere in brain tumor patients , 2005, Annals of neurology.

[2]  Daniel B Hier,et al.  Motor recovery after stroke: Lessons from functional brain imaging , 2002, Neurological research.

[3]  W D Heiss,et al.  Functional Imaging Correlates of Recovery after Stroke in Humans , 2000, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[4]  C M Epstein,et al.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation does not replicate the Wada test , 2000, Neurology.

[5]  M. Ohyama,et al.  Role of the nondominant hemisphere and undamaged area during word repetition in poststroke aphasics. A PET activation study. , 1996, Stroke.

[6]  Richard Passingham,et al.  The Inferior Frontal Gyrus and Phonological Processing: An Investigation using rTMS , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  Alexander Thiel,et al.  Neuroimaging-guided rTMS of the left inferior frontal gyrus interferes with repetition priming , 2005, NeuroImage.

[8]  A. Drzezga,et al.  Continuous Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation during Positron Emission Tomography: A Suitable Tool for Imaging Regional Excitability of the Human Cortex , 2001, NeuroImage.

[9]  C. Price,et al.  Mechanisms of recovery from aphasia: evidence from positron emission tomography studies , 1999, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[10]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Neural correlates of recovery from aphasia after damage to left inferior frontal cortex , 2000, Neurology.

[11]  E. Ringelstein,et al.  Language lateralization in healthy right-handers. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[12]  D. Schacter,et al.  Task-specific repetition priming in left inferior prefrontal cortex. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[13]  W D Heiss,et al.  Cerebral glucose metabolism as a predictor of recovery from aphasia in ischemic stroke. , 1993, Archives of neurology.

[14]  R L Hewer,et al.  Aphasia after stroke: natural history and associated deficits. , 1986, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[15]  A. Schleicher,et al.  Broca's region revisited: Cytoarchitecture and intersubject variability , 1999, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[16]  Felix M Mottaghy,et al.  Modulation of a brain-behavior relationship in verbal working memory by rTMS. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[17]  K. Ottenbacher,et al.  The statistical analysis of single-subject data: a comparative examination. , 1994, Physical therapy.

[18]  Celeratlon Line b,et al.  The Statistical Analysis of Single-Subject Data : A Comparative Examination , 2006 .

[19]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the dominant hemisphere can disrupt visual naming in temporal lobe epilepsy patientsfn2 fn2 Presented in part at the Annual Meeting of the American Neurological Association, October, 1996, Miami, FL. , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  G Gainotti,et al.  The riddle of the right hemisphere's contribution to the recovery of language. , 1993, European journal of disorders of communication : the journal of the College of Speech and Language Therapists, London.

[21]  M. Farah,et al.  Role of left inferior prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: a reevaluation. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  K Willmes,et al.  The Aachen Aphasia Test. , 1984, Advances in neurology.

[23]  P. Matthews,et al.  Semantic Processing in the Left Inferior Prefrontal Cortex: A Combined Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  K Herholz,et al.  Disturbance and recovery of language function: correlates in PET activation studies , 2003, NeuroImage.

[25]  Karl Herholz,et al.  Localization of Language-Related Cortex with15O-Labeled Water PET in Patients with Gliomas , 1998, NeuroImage.

[26]  Cornelius Weiller,et al.  Imaging recovery from stroke , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  R. Woods,et al.  Recovery from wernicke's aphasia: A positron emission tomographic study , 1995, Annals of neurology.

[28]  K Herholz,et al.  Plasticity of language networks in patients with brain tumors: A positron emission tomography activation study , 2001, Annals of neurology.

[29]  H. Karbe,et al.  Differential capacity of left and right hemispheric areas for compensation of poststroke aphasia , 1999, Annals of neurology.

[30]  E. Achten,et al.  Developing a comprehensive presurgical functional MRI protocol for patients with intractable temporal lobe epilepsy: a pilot study , 2002, Neuroradiology.

[31]  A. Thiel,et al.  Individual Functional Anatomy of Verb Generation , 1996, NeuroImage.

[32]  K Wienhard,et al.  The ECAT EXACT HR: Performance of a New High Resolution Positron Scanner , 1994, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[33]  M. Naeser,et al.  Neuroimaging and Language Recovery in Stroke , 1994, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[34]  H. Karbe,et al.  Brain Plasticity in Poststroke Aphasia: What Is the Contribution of the Right Hemisphere? , 1998, Brain and Language.

[35]  Cornelius Weiller,et al.  Recovery of motor and language abilities after stroke: the contribution of functional imaging , 2002, Progress in neurobiology.

[36]  Massimo Cincotta,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation and epilepsy , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[37]  E. Wassermann.  Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[38]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Induction of speech arrest and counting errors with rapid‐rate transcranial magnetic stimulation , 1991, Neurology.