Magnetic resonance guided high intensity focused ultrasound for uterine fibroids and adenomyosis has no effect on ovarian reserve

INTRODUCTION Uterine fibroids are the most common benign tumors in healthy women. High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) is a modern, noninvasive thermal ablation method for treating uterine fibroids. There is increasing evidence that ultrasound guided HIFU (US-HIFU) has no adverse impact on ovarian reserve but little data exists on magnetic resonance guided HIFU (MR-HIFU). There are different options to estimate ovarian reserve, perhaps the most reliable being the measurement of serum Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH). MATERIAL AND METHODS Seventy-four (74) premenopausal women with serum AMH 0.1 ug/L or over, aged 24-48 and with fibroids or adenomyosis treated with MR-HIFU were enrolled in our study. AMH levels were analyzed before and 3 months after the MR-HIFU treatment. Correlations between AMH level changes and position of fibroids, fibroid volume, non-perfused volume ratio, and treatment energies were studied. RESULTS The median AMH level before the HIFU treatment was 1.20 (range: 0.1-7.75 ug/L) and after the treatment 1.23 (range: 0.1-8.51 ug/L). No significant change was detected (p = .90). The patients were divided in three subgroups depending on the baseline AMH levels. The changes were not significant in any of the subgroups. Neither did the location of the treated fibroid affect the change of AMH levels nor the total energy used during treatment. CONCLUSIONS MR-HIFU does not compromise the ovarian reserve. Neither the location of the treated fibroid nor the total energy used during MR-HIFU had any effect on the change of AMH levels.

[1]  Ling Yan,et al.  High-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for symptomatic uterine fibroids: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2022, International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group.

[2]  J. Liu,et al.  Analysis of high intensity focused ultrasound in treatment of uterine fibroids on ovarian function and pregnancy outcome , 2021, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[3]  Ping Li,et al.  The Optimal Time of Ovarian Reserve Recovery After Laparoscopic Unilateral Ovarian Non-Endometriotic Cystectomy , 2021, Frontiers in Endocrinology.

[4]  Zhibiao Wang,et al.  The effect of ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for cesarean scar pregnancy on ovarian reserve , 2021, International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group.

[5]  R. Blanco Sequeiros,et al.  Feasibility of apparent diffusion coefficient in predicting the technical outcome of MR-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment of uterine fibroids – a comparison with the Funaki classification , 2021, International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group.

[6]  J. Visser,et al.  Anti-Müllerian Hormone and Ovarian Reserve: Update on Assessing Ovarian Function , 2020, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[7]  J. Forman,et al.  Ovarian reserve markers in women using various hormonal contraceptives , 2019, The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception.

[8]  Michael J. Miller,et al.  FIRSTT study: randomized controlled trial of uterine artery embolization vs focused ultrasound surgery , 2019, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  A. Iwase,et al.  Clinical application of serum anti‐Müllerian hormone as an ovarian reserve marker: A review of recent studies , 2018, The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research.

[10]  G. Hong,et al.  Changes in anti‐müllerian hormone levels as a biomarker for ovarian reserve after ultrasound‐guided high‐intensity focused ultrasound treatment of adenomyosis and uterine fibroid , 2017, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[11]  P. Sarrel,et al.  Hormone replacement therapy in young women with primary ovarian insufficiency and early menopause. , 2016, Fertility and sterility.

[12]  Y. Song,et al.  The effects of uterine artery embolization on ovarian reserve. , 2016, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[13]  O. Franco,et al.  Association of Age at Onset of Menopause and Time Since Onset of Menopause With Cardiovascular Outcomes, Intermediate Vascular Traits, and All-Cause Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. , 2016, JAMA cardiology.

[14]  T. P. Lam,et al.  Ovarian Reserve After Ultrasound-Guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Uterine Fibroids: Preliminary Experience. , 2016, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC.

[15]  Xuyin Zhang,et al.  Comprehensive Assessment of the Impact of Laparoscopic Ovarian Cystectomy on Ovarian Reserve. , 2015, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.

[16]  E. Ng,et al.  Comparison of serum anti-Mullerian hormone levels following hysterectomy and myomectomy for benign gynaecological conditions. , 2013, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[17]  M. Sammel,et al.  Pretreatment antimüllerian hormone levels determine rate of posttherapy ovarian reserve recovery: acute changes in ovarian reserve during and after chemotherapy. , 2012, Fertility and sterility.

[18]  C. Atabekoğlu,et al.  The effect of total abdominal hysterectomy on serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels: a pilot study , 2012, Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society.

[19]  S. Kim,et al.  Impact of laparoscopic cystectomy on ovarian reserve: serial changes of serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels. , 2010, Fertility and sterility.

[20]  M. Eijkemans,et al.  Comparison of inter- and intra-cycle variability of anti-Mullerian hormone and antral follicle counts. , 2010, Human reproduction.

[21]  J. Reekers,et al.  Loss of ovarian reserve after uterine artery embolization: a randomized comparison with hysterectomy. , 2007, Human reproduction.

[22]  A. Volpe,et al.  Anti-Müllerian hormone measurement on any day of the menstrual cycle strongly predicts ovarian response in assisted reproductive technology. , 2007, Human reproduction.