Perceived satisfaction, perceived usefulness and interactive learning environments as predictors to self-regulation in e-learning environments

The research purpose is to investigate learner self-regulation in e-learning environments. In order to better understand learner attitudes toward e-learning, 196 university students answer a questionnaire survey after use an e-learning system few months. The statistical results showed that perceived satisfaction, perceived usefulness, and interactive learning environments were all found to predict perceived self-regulation in e-learning environments. Further, perceived usefulness can be influenced by interactive learning environments, perceived self-efficacy, and perceived satisfaction. In addition, perceived satisfaction can be affected by interactive learning environments, perceived self-efficacy, and perceived anxiety. Finally, the study proposes a conceptual model to investigate learner self-regulation in e-learning environments.

[1]  Shu-Sheng Liaw,et al.  Considerations for Developing Constructivist Web-Based Learning , 2004 .

[2]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Measuring usability: preference vs. performance , 1994, CACM.

[3]  Hsiu-Li Liao,et al.  Impact of media richness and flow on e-learning technology acceptance , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[4]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Angela F. L. Wong,et al.  Computer anxiety and its correlates : a meta-analysis , 1999 .

[6]  Marek Hatala,et al.  Investigating acceptance toward mobile learning to assist individual knowledge management: Based on activity theory approach , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[7]  P. Pintrich.  A Motivational Science Perspective on the Role of Student Motivation in Learning and Teaching Contexts. , 2003 .

[8]  Meng-Jung Tsai,et al.  The Model of Strategic e-Learning: Understanding and Evaluating Student e-Learning from Metacognitive Perspectives , 2009, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[9]  S.-S. Liaw,et al.  Understanding user perceptions of World-wide web environments , 2002, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[10]  A. Artino,et al.  Academic motivation and self-regulation: A comparative analysis of undergraduate and graduate students learning online , 2009, Internet High. Educ..

[11]  Dowming Yeh,et al.  What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[12]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[13]  Shu-Sheng Liaw,et al.  Developing a Collaborative e-Learning System Based on Users' Perceptions , 2006, CSCWD.

[14]  Eric D. Heggestad,et al.  Individual differences in motivation: Traits and self-regulatory skills. , 1999 .

[15]  Christine H. Lewis,et al.  Driving factors for e-learning: An organisational perspective , 2002 .

[16]  Maria Virvou,et al.  On the usability and likeability of virtual reality games for education: The case of VR-ENGAGE , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[17]  William J. Doll,et al.  The Measurement of End-User Computing Satisfaction , 1988, MIS Q..

[18]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Self-Regulation and E-Learning , 2007, ECIS.

[19]  A. Kitsantas,et al.  Supporting Self-Regulation in Student-Centered Web-Based Learning Environments , 2002 .

[20]  R. Azevedo,et al.  Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students' learning with hypermedia? , 2004 .

[21]  Caroline Presno.  Taking the Byte Out of Internet Anxiety: Instructional Techniques That Reduce Computer/Internet Anxiety in the Classroom , 1998 .

[22]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Self-Motivation for Academic Attainment: The Role of Self-Efficacy Beliefs and Personal Goal Setting , 1992, American Educational Research Journal.

[23]  Gwo-Dong Chen,et al.  Users' attitudes toward Web-based collaborative learning systems for knowledge management , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[24]  Yi-Shun Wang,et al.  Multi-criteria evaluation of the web-based e-learning system: A methodology based on learner satisfaction and its applications , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[25]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Reflections on Theories of Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement , 2013 .

[26]  Kamariah Abu Bakar,et al.  Qualitative findings of students' perception on practice of self-regulated strategies in online community discussion , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[27]  D. Ganster,et al.  Work Stress and Employee Health , 1991 .

[28]  Allyson F. Hadwin,et al.  CoNoteS2: A Software Tool for Promoting Self-Regulation , 2001 .

[29]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  The Future of Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: The Survey Says... , 2006 .

[30]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  The Use of Information Technology to Enhance Management School Education: A Theoretical View , 1995, MIS Q..

[31]  Chien Chou,et al.  Incidences and correlates of Internet anxiety among high school teachers in Taiwan , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[32]  Alan Durndell,et al.  Computer self efficacy, computer anxiety, attitudes towards the Internet and reported experience with the Internet, by gender, in an East European sample , 2002, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[33]  Jerry Cha-Jan Chang,et al.  A contingency model of computer and Internet self-efficacy , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[34]  John P. Campbell,et al.  Measurement Theory for the Behavioral Sciences. , 1983 .

[35]  Elizabeth M. Weiss,et al.  Computer self-efficacy and anxiety scales for an Internet sample: testing measurement equivalence of existing measures and development of new scales , 2004, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[36]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[37]  Regina Juchun Chu,et al.  Multi-level analysis of peer support, Internet self-efficacy and e-learning outcomes - The contextual effects of collectivism and group potency , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[38]  Mark J. Brosnan,et al.  The relationship between Internet identification, Internet anxiety and Internet use , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[39]  C. Spielberger,et al.  Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory , 1970 .

[40]  Yi-Shun Wang,et al.  Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[41]  Marylène Gagné,et al.  Understanding e-learning continuance intention in the workplace: A self-determination theory perspective , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[42]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action , 1986 .

[43]  Dan Bouhnik,et al.  Interaction in distance-learning courses , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[44]  Luvai Motiwalla,et al.  Mobile learning: A framework and evaluation , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[45]  James M. Laffey,et al.  Understanding Usability and User Experience of Web-Based 3D Graphics Technology , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[46]  David F. Larcker,et al.  Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics: , 1981 .

[47]  Bracha Kramarski,et al.  How can self-regulated learning be supported in mathematical E-learning environments? , 2006, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[48]  Chih-Ming Chen.  Personalized E-learning system with self-regulated learning assisted mechanisms for promoting learning performance , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[49]  R. Kneebone.  Simulation in surgical training: educational issues and practical implications , 2003, Medical education.

[50]  Buenafe R. Abdon,et al.  Multisectoral partnerships in e-learning: A potential force for improved human capital development in the Asia Pacific , 2001, Internet High. Educ..

[51]  Shu-Sheng Liaw,et al.  Investigating students' perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[52]  Gitte Lindgaard,et al.  What is this evasive beast we call user satisfaction? , 2003, Interact. Comput..