Who makes good use of memory aids? Results of a survey of people with acquired brain injury

Abstract Wilson and Watson (1996) identified several factors that were associated with use of memory aids and strategies in a group of people with acquired brain injury. The present study tested these findings, with the aim of identifying the variables that best predict effective use of memory aids after brain injury. One-hundred and one people with memory problems arising from brain injury and their carers were interviewed to identify the aids/strategies used to compensate for memory impairment, and the efficacy of their use. Information relating to variables previously found, or hypothesized to predict use of memory aids, was collected. Use of memory aids correlated with level of independence. External aids such as calendars, wall charts, and notebooks were the most commonly used memory aids. Electronic organizers were not used by many participants. The variables that best predicted use of memory aids were (1) current age, (2) time since injury, (3) number of aids used premorbidly, and (4) a measure of attentional functioning. The implications for rehabilitation services are discussed. (JINS, 2003, 9, 925–935.)

[1]  P. Burgess,et al.  The ecological validity of tests of executive function , 1998, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[2]  J. Evans,et al.  Reducing everyday memory and planning problems by means of a paging system: a randomised control crossover study , 2001, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[3]  Narinder Kapur,et al.  Memory aids in the rehabilitation of memory disordered patients. , 1995 .

[4]  K. Willmes,et al.  Subjective experience in brain-injured patients and their close relatives: a European Brain Injury Questionnaire study. , 1997, Brain injury.

[5]  Paul W. Burgess,et al.  Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome , 1997 .

[6]  D. Goldberg.  The detection of psychiatric illness by questionnaire : a technique for the identification and assessment of non-psychotic psychiatric illness , 1972 .

[7]  B. Wilson,et al.  A memory group for individuals with brain injury , 1992 .

[8]  H. Emslie,et al.  Comparison of pocket-computer memory aids for people with brain injury. , 2001, Brain injury.

[9]  Michael D. Kopelman,et al.  Handbook of memory disorders , 1995 .

[10]  I. Robertson,et al.  Motor recovery after stroke depends on intact sustained attention: a 2-year follow-up study. , 1997, Neuropsychology.

[11]  H. Emslie,et al.  Evaluation of NeuroPage: a new memory aid , 1997, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[12]  B. G. Deelman,et al.  Long-term effects of memory rehabilitation: A controlled study , 1991 .

[13]  Barbara A. Wilson,et al.  Long-term prognosis of patients with severe memory disorders , 1991 .

[14]  Peter La Cour,et al.  Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test , 1990 .

[15]  A Baddeley,et al.  Speed and Capacity of Language Processing Test: Normative Data From an Older American Community-Dwelling Sample , 2001, Applied neuropsychology.

[16]  Barbara A. Wilson,et al.  Coping with Amnesia: The Natural History of a Compensatory Memory System , 2019, Case Studies in the Neuropsychology of Memory.

[17]  B. Wilson,et al.  A practical framework for understanding compensatory behaviour in people with organic memory impairment. , 1996, Memory.

[18]  Ian H. Robertson,et al.  The test of everyday attention , 1994 .

[19]  I H Robertson.  Setting goals for cognitive rehabilitation. , 1999, Current opinion in neurology.

[20]  Mm. Liabre.  Standard Progressive Matrices , 1984 .