Mathematical regularities of data from the property listing task

Abstract To study linguistically coded concepts, researchers often resort to the Property Listing Task (PLT). In a PLT, participants are asked to list properties that describe a concept (e.g., for DOG, subjects may list “is a pet”, “has four legs”, etc.), which are then coded into property types (i.e., superficially dissimilar properties such as “has four legs” and “is a quadruped” may be coded as “four legs”). When the PLT is done for many concepts, researchers obtain Conceptual Properties Norms (CPNs), which are used to study semantic content and as a source of control variables. Though the PLT and CPNs are widely used across psychology, there is a lack of a formal model of the PLT, which would provide better analysis tools. Particularly, nobody has attempted analyzing the PLT’s listing process. Thus, in the current work we develop a mathematical description of the PLT. Our analyses indicate that several regularities should be found in the observable data obtained from a PLT. Using data from three different CPNs (from 3 countries and 2 different languages), we show that these regularities do in fact exist and generalize well across different CPNs. Overall, our results suggest that the description of the regularities found in PLT data may be fruitfully used in the study of concepts.

[1]  John R. Anderson Retrieval of propositional information from long-term memory , 1974 .

[2]  B. Underwood,et al.  Proactive inhibition in short-term retention of single items , 1962 .

[3]  J. Wixted,et al.  Analyzing the dynamics of free recall: An integrative review of the empirical literature , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[5]  Amy Perfors,et al.  The “Small World of Words” English word association norms for over 12,000 cue words , 2018, Behavior Research Methods.

[6]  Delos D. Wickens,et al.  The nature and timing of the retrieval process and of interference effects. , 1981 .

[7]  Kevin A Hallgren,et al.  Computing Inter-Rater Reliability for Observational Data: An Overview and Tutorial. , 2012, Tutorials in quantitative methods for psychology.

[8]  Margaret A. Nemeth,et al.  Applied Multivariate Methods for Data Analysis , 1998, Technometrics.

[9]  Enrique Canessa,et al.  The role of variability in the property listing task , 2017, Behavior Research Methods.

[10]  F. Binkofski,et al.  The challenge of abstract concepts. , 2017, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  Working memory and retrieval: a resource-dependent inhibition model. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[12]  Adam N. Sanborn,et al.  Categorization as nonparametric Bayesian density estimation , 2008 .

[13]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The fan effect: New results and new theories. , 1999 .

[14]  W. E. Hockley,et al.  Memory Search: A Matter of Time , 2008 .

[15]  D. Kleinbaum,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariate Methods , 1978 .

[16]  Gwowen Shieh,et al.  Improved Shrinkage Estimation of Squared Multiple Correlation Coefficient and Squared Cross-Validity Coefficient , 2008 .

[17]  Mark J. Huff,et al.  An Abundance of Riches: Cross-Task Comparisons of Semantic Richness Effects in Visual Word Recognition , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[18]  Chris McNorgan,et al.  Feature-feature causal relations and statistical co-occurrences in object concepts , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[19]  Ken McRae,et al.  Semantic Memory: Some Insights from Feature-Based Connectionist Attractor Networks , 2004 .

[20]  Sean M. Polyn,et al.  A context maintenance and retrieval model of organizational processes in free recall. , 2009, Psychological review.

[21]  Ken McRae,et al.  Category - Specific semantic deficits , 2008 .

[22]  Adam F. Osth,et al.  A Prospective for a Unified Model of Episodic Memory , 2015 .

[23]  Lawrence J Walker,et al.  Differing conceptions of moral exemplarity: just, brave, and caring. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  G. Hough,et al.  Free listing: A method to gain initial insight of a food category , 2010 .

[25]  William S. Maki,et al.  Judgments of associative memory , 2007, Cognitive Psychology.

[26]  D. Wickens,et al.  Proactive inhibition and item similarity in short-term memory , 1963 .

[27]  Ken McRae,et al.  Further evidence for feature correlations in semantic memory. , 1999, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[28]  Yevgeniy B. Sirotin,et al.  Going beyond a single list: Modeling the effects of prior experience on episodic free recall , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[29]  R. Engle,et al.  Working-memory capacity, proactive interference, and divided attention: limits on long-term memory retrieval. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  C. Caltagirone,et al.  Alzheimer's disease and semantic deficits: a feature-listing study. , 2012, Neuropsychology.

[31]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  The development of features in object concepts , 1998, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[32]  Michael N. Jones,et al.  Foraging in Semantic Fields: How We Search Through Memory , 2015, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[33]  F. Ashby,et al.  Categorization as probability density estimation , 1995 .

[34]  Marianna Bolognesi,et al.  Reliability in content analysis: The case of semantic feature norms classification , 2016, Behavior Research Methods.

[35]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things , 2005, Behavior research methods.

[36]  Ettore Ambrosini,et al.  Semantic memory: A feature-based analysis and new norms for Italian , 2013, Behavior research methods.

[37]  Robert L. Goldstone Influences of categorization on perceptual discrimination. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[38]  Jacob Cohen A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[39]  Part-list cuing and the dynamics of false recall , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[40]  Anna M. Borghi,et al.  Words as tools and the problem of abstract words meanings , 2009 .

[41]  F. T. Eggemeier,et al.  Multiple encoding of word attributes in memory , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[42]  M. Garrett,et al.  Representing the meanings of object and action words: The featural and unitary semantic space hypothesis , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.

[43]  T. Rogers,et al.  Semantic diversity: A measure of semantic ambiguity based on variability in the contextual usage of words , 2012, Behavior Research Methods.

[44]  Marco Baroni,et al.  A set of semantic norms for German and Italian , 2011, Behavior research methods.

[45]  A. Paivio Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach , 1986 .

[46]  Joseph G. Eisenhauer Regression through the Origin , 2003 .

[47]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Perceptual simulation in conceptual combination: evidence from property generation. , 2009, Acta psychologica.

[48]  R. H. Myers,et al.  Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments , 1995 .

[49]  A. Bowman,et al.  Applied smoothing techniques for data analysis : the kernel approach with S-plus illustrations , 1999 .

[50]  Jeroen Geertzen,et al.  The Centre for Speech, Language and the Brain (CSLB) concept property norms , 2013, Behavior research methods.

[51]  Alessandro Lenci,et al.  BLIND: a set of semantic feature norms from the congenitally blind , 2013, Behavior research methods.

[52]  J. Vivas,et al.  Spanish semantic feature production norms for 400 concrete concepts , 2017, Behavior research methods.

[53]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  A Formal Theory of Interaction in Social Groups , 1952 .

[54]  J. W. Hutchinson,et al.  Nearest neighbor analysis of psychological spaces. , 1986 .

[55]  Michael N. Jones,et al.  The semantic richness of abstract concepts , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[56]  Lawrence W. Barsalou,et al.  Language and simulation in conceptual processing , 2008 .

[57]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Whither structured representation? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[58]  Richard M. Shiffrin,et al.  SAM: A theory of probabilistic search in associative memory. , 1980 .

[59]  Mark H. Ashcraft,et al.  Property norms for typical and atypical items from 17 categories: A description and discussion , 1978 .

[60]  Xu Xu,et al.  Content Differences for Abstract and Concrete Concept , 2005, Cogn. Sci..