Design by Directed Evolution

The stunning array of features and functions exhibited by proteins in nature should convince most scientists of the power of evolutionary design processes. Natural selection acting on populations over long periods of time has generated a vast number of proteins ideally suited to their biological functions. When we try to recruit these remarkable molecular machines for new tasksfrom serving as industrial catalysts to being used as additives for laundry detergentswe find that they are often not so well suited. (The chemist is not terribly impressed with a synthesis requiring a reactor the size of a football field simply because the enzyme functions in water and the substrate does not dissolve, nor is she pleased with a catalyst shut down by the products of its own reaction.) Evolution is usually the culprit:  proteins are optimized, and often highly specialized, for specific biological tasks. Most protein reengineering efforts have been by so-called rational design. The filtering effect of scientific publication (successes get published, failures mostly do not) might lead one to believe that we can, with reasonable probability of success, identify and modify the amino acids responsible for key properties such as an enzyme's substrate preference, stability, or activity in a nonnatural environment. In reality, we are far from being able to do this reliably. This is true even for the relatively small number of enzymes for which considerable structural and mechanistic data are available. Admitting ineptitude in rational design, however, frees us to consider other approaches which are hardly irrational. An alternative and highly effective design strategy can be found by looking to the processes by which all these proteins came about in the first place. My research has been devoted to recreating in the laboratory the key processes of evolution and doing it in such a way that we can design scientifically interesting and technologically useful molecules. The challenge is to collapse the time scale for evolution from millions of years to months or even weeks.

[1]  M. Eigen The physics of molecular evolution. , 1986 .

[2]  New Developments in Enzymatic Peptide Synthesis , 1992 .

[3]  F. Arnold,et al.  Tuning the activity of an enzyme for unusual environments: sequential random mutagenesis of subtilisin E for catalysis in dimethylformamide. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  W. Stemmer DNA shuffling by random fragmentation and reassembly: in vitro recombination for molecular evolution. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  W. Stemmer Rapid evolution of a protein in vitro by DNA shuffling , 1994, Nature.

[6]  J W Szostak,et al.  Structurally complex and highly active RNA ligases derived from random RNA sequences. , 1995, Science.

[7]  W. Stemmer,et al.  Improved Green Fluorescent Protein by Molecular Evolution Using DNA Shuffling , 1996, Nature Biotechnology.

[8]  Frances H. Arnold,et al.  Directed evolution of a para-nitrobenzyl esterase for aqueous-organic solvents , 1996, Nature Biotechnology.

[9]  Frances H. Arnold,et al.  Directed evolution: Creating biocatalysts for the future , 1996 .

[10]  F. Arnold,et al.  Directed evolution of subtilisin E in Bacillus subtilis to enhance total activity in aqueous dimethylformamide. , 1996, Protein engineering.

[11]  F. Arnold,et al.  Combinatorial protein design: strategies for screening protein libraries. , 1997, Current opinion in structural biology.

[12]  W. Stemmer,et al.  Directed evolution of a fucosidase from a galactosidase by DNA shuffling and screening. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  F. Arnold,et al.  Optimization of DNA shuffling for high fidelity recombination. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[14]  F. Arnold,et al.  Strategies for the in vitro evolution of protein function: enzyme evolution by random recombination of improved sequences. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  F. Arnold,et al.  Functional and nonfunctional mutations distinguished by random recombination of homologous genes. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  W. Stemmer,et al.  Molecular evolution of an arsenate detoxification pathway by DNA shuffling , 1997, Nature Biotechnology.

[17]  D. Hilvert,et al.  3D structural information as a guide to protein engineering using genetic selection. , 1997, Current opinion in structural biology.

[18]  W. Stemmer,et al.  DNA shuffling of a family of genes from diverse species accelerates directed evolution , 1998, Nature.

[19]  Frances H. Arnold,et al.  Molecular evolution by staggered extension process (StEP) in vitro recombination , 1998, Nature Biotechnology.

[20]  F. Arnold,et al.  Directed evolution of a thermostable esterase. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  F. Arnold,et al.  Random-priming in vitro recombination: an effective tool for directed evolution. , 1998, Nucleic acids research.