A Lexical Semantic Explanation for ‘Quirky’ Case Marking in Hindi

The case canonically assigned to subjects across languages is nominative or ergative case. In a number of languages including Tamil, Russian, Finnish, Icelandic, Malayalam and Hindi, subjects can receive dative case marking. This phenomenon, labelled ‘quirky’ or ‘lexical’ case-marking, is generally accounted for in terms of the association of dative case with an argument bearing a particular thematic role in the lexical entries of individual verbs (Zaenen, Maling & Thrainsson, 1985). Such an account does not account for all the data, neither does it explain why certain thematic roles should get dative case marking. In this paper, I show that the case-marking patterns in Hindi can be accounted for in a principled manner in terms of the interaction of the aspectual characteristics of the construction, its adicity, and the relative prominence of the arguments of the verb on the Thematic Hierarchy. My account of this phenomenon is formulated within the framework of Role and Reference Grammar (Foley & Van Valin 1984; Van Valin 1991, 1993).

[1]  Robert D. Jr. Valin Another look at Icelandic case marking and grammatical relations , 1991 .

[2]  Martin Everaert NP-movement ‘across’ secondary objects , 1990 .

[3]  R. Valin A synopsis of role and reference grammar , 1992 .

[4]  Anoop Mahajan,et al.  The A/A-bar distinction and movement theory , 1990 .

[5]  R. Jackendoff On Larson's treatment of the double object construction , 1990 .

[6]  A. Belletti,et al.  Psych-verbs and θ-theory , 1988 .

[7]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  The Architecture of the Language Faculty , 1996 .

[8]  R. Larson On the double object construction , 1988 .

[9]  乾 浩恵 On the Double Object Construction , 1998 .

[10]  Julia A. Jolly Preposition assignment in English , 1992 .

[11]  Mark C. Baker,et al.  On the Structural Positions of Themes and Goals , 1996 .

[12]  A. Saksena Contact in Causation , 1982 .

[13]  David R. Dowty Word Meaning and Montague Grammar: The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and in M , 1979 .

[14]  Van Valin,et al.  Semantic Parameters of Split Intransitivity , 1990 .

[15]  Robert D. Van Valin,et al.  Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar , 1984 .

[16]  Z. Vendler Linguistics in Philosophy , 1967 .

[17]  A. Zaenen,et al.  Case and grammatical functions: The Icelandic passive , 1985 .

[18]  Tara Warrier Mohanan,et al.  Arguments in Hindi , 1990 .

[19]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar , 1972 .

[20]  KASHI WALI,et al.  Hindi agreement as anaphor , 1989 .