An automated machine vision system for the histological grading of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)

The histological grading of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) remains subjective, resulting in inter‐ and intra‐observer variation and poor reproducibility in the grading of cervical lesions. This study has attempted to develop an objective grading system using automated machine vision. The architectural features of cervical squamous epithelium are quantitatively analysed using a combination of computerized digital image processing and Delaunay triangulation analysis; 230 images digitally captured from cases previously classified by a gynaecological pathologist included normal cervical squamous epithelium (n=30), koilocytosis (n=46), CIN 1 (n=52), CIN 2 (n=56), and CIN 3 (n=46). Intra‐ and inter‐observer variation had kappa values of 0.502 and 0.415, respectively. A machine vision system was developed in KS400 macro programming language to segment and mark the centres of all nuclei within the epithelium. By object‐oriented analysis of image components, the positional information of nuclei was used to construct a Delaunay triangulation mesh. Each mesh was analysed to compute triangle dimensions including the mean triangle area, the mean triangle edge length, and the number of triangles per unit area, giving an individual quantitative profile of measurements for each case. Discriminant analysis of the geometric data revealed the significant discriminatory variables from which a classification score was derived. The scoring system distinguished between normal and CIN 3 in 98.7% of cases and between koilocytosis and CIN 1 in 76.5% of cases, but only 62.3% of the CIN cases were classified into the correct group, with the CIN 2 group showing the highest rate of misclassification. Graphical plots of triangulation data demonstrated the continuum of morphological change from normal squamous epithelium to the highest grade of CIN, with overlapping of the groups originally defined by the pathologists. This study shows that automated location of nuclei in cervical biopsies using computerized image analysis is possible. Analysis of positional information enables quantitative evaluation of architectural features in CIN using Delaunay triangulation meshes, which is effective in the objective classification of CIN. This demonstrates the future potential of automated machine vision systems in diagnostic histopathology. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  M A Duhr,et al.  Discrimination between precancerous and cancerous lesions of the uterine cervix by DNA measurements on tissue sections. , 1985, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[2]  P. Hamilton,et al.  Classification of normal colorectal mucosa and adenocarcinoma by morphometry , 1987, Histopathology.

[3]  C. Brown,et al.  The 1988 Bethesda System for reporting cervical/vaginal cytologic diagnoses. , 1990, Acta cytologica.

[4]  R. Kudo,et al.  Morphology of adenocarcinoma in situ and microinvasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. A cytologic and ultrastructural study. , 1991, Acta cytologica.

[5]  P. Hamilton,et al.  Morphometrical analysis in ulcerative colitis with dysplasia and carcinoma , 1987, Histopathology.

[6]  P. Barbini,et al.  Gastric dysplasia: A stereological and morphometrical assessment , 1987, The Journal of pathology.

[7]  D J Zahniser,et al.  Measurement of subvisual changes in cervical squamous metaplastic cells for detecting abnormality. , 1992, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[8]  I Ricketts,et al.  Automation in cervical cytology: an overview. , 1992, Analytical cellular pathology : the journal of the European Society for Analytical Cellular Pathology.

[9]  P H Bartels,et al.  Knowledge-guided segmentation and morphometric analysis of colorectal dysplasia. , 1995, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[10]  D. Fish,et al.  Pathologist variation in reporting cervical borderline epithelial abnormalities and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. , 1995, Journal of clinical pathology.

[11]  M Y Maeda,et al.  Image analysis of nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio in cervical smears to discriminate three grades of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. , 1997, Acta cytologica.

[12]  K Kayser,et al.  Neighborhood analysis of low magnification structures (glands) in healthy, adenomatous, and carcinomatous colon mucosa. , 1986, Pathology, research and practice.

[13]  L. Jarvis,et al.  Morphometric analysis of gastric dysplasia , 1985, The Journal of pathology.

[14]  P H Bartels,et al.  Machine vision-based histometry of premalignant and malignant prostatic lesions. , 1995, Pathology, research and practice.

[15]  C. Rubio,et al.  A morphometric method to discriminate normal from dysplastic/carcinoma in situ squamous epithelium in the human esophagus. , 1989, Pathology, research and practice.

[16]  A. Böcking,et al.  Diagnostic and prognostic value of DNA cytometry in gynecologic cytology. , 1989, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[17]  P W Hamilton,et al.  Interobserver variation in the reporting of cervical colposcopic biopsy specimens: comparison of grading systems. , 1996, Journal of clinical pathology.

[18]  J. Tucker An image analysis system for cervical cytology automation using nuclear DNA content. , 1979, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[19]  Diane Soloman,et al.  The 1988 Bethesda system for reporting cervical/vaginal cytologic diagnoses: Developed and approved at the national cancer institute workshop in Bethesda, MD, December 12–13, 1988 , 1989, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[20]  D L Rosenthal,et al.  Prediction of cervical neoplasia diagnosis groups. Discriminant analysis on digitized cell images. , 1987, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[21]  A. V. van Driel-Kulker,et al.  Image cytometry in automated cervical screening. , 1989, Analytical cellular pathology : the journal of the European Society for Analytical Cellular Pathology.

[22]  G A Meijer,et al.  Syntactic structure analysis. , 1995, Pathologica.

[23]  P H Bartels,et al.  Tissue architectural features for the grading of prostatic carcinoma. , 1990, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[24]  D. Rosenthal,et al.  Prognosis of moderate dysplasia. Predictive value of selected markers in routinely prepared cervical smears. , 1987, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[25]  R. Newcombe,et al.  Observer variation in histopathological diagnosis and grading of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. , 1989, BMJ.

[26]  A M Zaitoun,et al.  Quantitative assessment of gastric atrophy using the syntactic structure analysis. , 1998, Journal of clinical pathology.

[27]  P W Hamilton,et al.  Inter‐ and intra‐observer variation in the histopathological reporting of cervical squamous in traepithelial lesion susing a modified Bethesda grading system , 1998, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[28]  M. Bibbo,et al.  Correlation between automated karyometric measurements of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus and histopathologic and clinical features , 1989, Cancer.

[29]  A. Zetterberg,et al.  Retrospective DNA analyses in cervical dysplasia as related to neoplastic progression or regression. , 1979, Analytical and quantitative cytology.

[30]  P H Bartels,et al.  Ploidy patterns in cervical dysplasia. , 1985, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[31]  P H Bartels,et al.  COMPUTERIZED SCENE SEGMENTATION FOR THE DISCRIMINATION OF ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES IN DUCTAL PROLIFERATIVE LESIONS OF THE BREAST , 1997, The Journal of pathology.

[32]  H. Fox,et al.  "CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA" , 1982, The Lancet.

[33]  P. Hamilton,et al.  A morphometric assessment of transitional mucosa in the colon , 1988, Histopathology.

[34]  P. Hamilton,et al.  Architectural morphometry in ulcerative colitis with dysplasia , 1988, Histopathology.