Attitudes and Language Use in Group Discussions on Socio-Scientific Issues
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Troy D. Sadler,et al. Beyond STS: A research‐based framework for socioscientific issues education , 2005 .
[2] Ying-Tien Wu,et al. High School Students’ Informal Reasoning on a Socio‐scientific Issue: Qualitative and quantitative analyses , 2007 .
[3] J. Schee,et al. The Development of Understanding of Evidence in Pre-University Biology Education in the Netherlands , 2013 .
[4] Mary Ratcliffe,et al. Social aspects of argumentation , 2007 .
[5] Sibel Erduran,et al. Argumentation in Science Education: Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research , 2007 .
[6] Anat Zohar,et al. Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics , 2002 .
[7] J. Dewey,et al. How We Think , 2009 .
[8] Troy D. Sadler,et al. Socioscience and Ethics in Science Classrooms: Teacher Perspectives and Strategies. , 2006 .
[9] Michelle L. Klosterman,et al. Multi‐level Assessment of Scientific Content Knowledge Gains Associated with Socioscientific Issues‐based Instruction , 2010 .
[10] Troy D. Sadler,et al. Socioscientific Argumentation: The effects of content knowledge and morality , 2006 .
[11] S. Barab,et al. What Do Students Gain by Engaging in Socioscientific Inquiry? , 2007 .
[12] B. Bernstein. Theoretical Studies Towards a Sociology of Language , 1972 .
[13] T. Sadler. Moral sensitivity and its contribution to the resolution of socio-scientific issues. , 2004, Journal of moral education.
[14] J. Osborne,et al. Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms , 2000 .
[15] Wing-Sum Cheung,et al. Online discussion and critical thinking skills: A case study in a Singapore secondary school , 2008 .
[16] Shu Ching Yang,et al. Applying the Practical Inquiry Model to investigate the quality of students' online discourse in an information ethics course based on Bloom's teaching goal and Bird's 3C model , 2012, Comput. Educ..
[17] Troy D. Sadler,et al. Patterns of Informal Reasoning in the Context of Socioscientific Decision Making. , 2005 .
[18] Troy D. Sadler,et al. Situated learning in science education: socio‐scientific issues as contexts for practice , 2009 .
[19] Hsiao-Ching She,et al. On-line synchronous scientific argumentation learning: Nurturing students' argumentation ability and conceptual change in science context , 2010, Comput. Educ..
[20] Martin Braund,et al. Gauging Students’ Untutored Ability in Argumentation about Experimental Data: A South African case study , 2010 .
[21] B. Bernstein,et al. Class, Codes and Control, Vol. 2 , 1974 .
[22] S. Erduran,et al. TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's Argument Pattern for studying science discourse , 2004 .
[23] R. Levinson. Science education and democratic participation: an uneasy congruence? , 2010 .
[24] Stein DankerT. Kolstoe. Consensus projects: teaching science for citizenship , 2000 .
[25] J. Osborne,et al. Exploring young students' collaborative argumentation within a socioscientific issue , 2013 .
[26] Johan Öhman,et al. DEQUAL: A Tool for Investigating Deliberative Qualities in Students’ Socioscientific Conversations , 2013 .
[27] Troy D. Sadler,et al. Advancing reflective judgment through Socioscientific Issues , 2009 .
[28] Sonja M. Mork. ICT in Science Education. Exploring the Digital Learning Materials at viten.no , 2012 .
[29] Frances Lawrenz,et al. Promoting and scaffolding argumentation through reflective asynchronous discussions , 2012, Comput. Educ..
[30] Marcus Grace,et al. Developing High Quality Decision‐Making Discussions About Biological Conservation in a Normal Classroom Setting , 2009 .
[31] S. Toulmin. The uses of argument , 1960 .
[32] Mary Ratcliffe,et al. Pupil decision‐making about socio‐scientific issues within the science curriculum , 1997 .
[33] Dana L. Zeidler,et al. The Role of Moral Reasoning on Socioscientific Issues and Discourse in Science Education , 2003 .
[34] Christine Howe,et al. Classroom dialogue: a systematic review across four decades of research , 2013 .
[35] Troy D. Sadler,et al. Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research , 2004 .
[36] Troy D. Sadler,et al. The Role of Moral Reasoning in Argumentation: Conscience, Character, and Care , 2007 .
[37] C. Linder,et al. Students’ Ontological Security and Agency in Science Education—An Example from Reasoning about the Use of Gene Technology , 2013 .
[38] John Leach,et al. Discussion of Socio‐scientific Issues: The role of science knowledge , 2006 .
[39] Mary Ratcliffe,et al. The science and values that young people draw upon to make decisions about biological conservation issues , 2002 .
[40] Troy D. Sadler,et al. The Significance of Content Knowledge for Informal Reasoning regarding Socioscientific Issues: Applying Genetics Knowledge to Genetic Engineering Issues. , 2005 .
[41] R. Duschl,et al. "Doing the Lesson" or "Doing Science": Argument in High School Genetics , 2000 .
[42] D. Zeidler,et al. The Morality of Socioscientific Issues: Construal and Resolution of Genetic Engineering Dilemmas. , 2004 .