Application of geomorphic analysis and ground-penetrating radar to characterization of paleoseismic sites in dynamic alluvial environments: an example from southern California

Abstract Selecting paleoseismic sites in dynamic, range-front environments can be difficult, because they are sites of rapid deposition and poor preservation of coarse-grained, channelized alluvium. The most obvious tectonic landforms, tall scarps, are often too old to constrain sequences of specific rupture events. The faulted deposits that do provide maximum and minimum earthquake ages, however, are often buried or masked by erosion in active drainage channels. Subsurface images of stratigraphic and structural relationships at multiple sites are useful prior to excavation. Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) is an effective tool for locating sites suitable for trenching studies. We illustrate the utility of GPR with a case study of a thrust fault in southern California.

[1]  A. P. Annan,et al.  Ground-penetrating radar for high-resolution mapping of soil and rock stratigraphy , 1989 .

[2]  R. Knight,et al.  The dielectric constant of sandstones, 60 kHz to 4 MHz , 1987 .

[3]  R. Lawrence Edwards,et al.  Submergence and uplift associated with the giant 1833 Sumatran subduction earthquake: Evidence from coral microatolls , 1999 .

[4]  B. F. Atwater,et al.  Evidence for Great Holocene Earthquakes Along the Outer Coast of Washington State , 1987, Science.

[5]  M. Eppes,et al.  Influence of soil development on the geomorphic evolution of landscapes: An example from the Transverse Ranges of California , 2002 .

[6]  D. Nobes,et al.  Recent vertical offset and near‐surface structure of the Alpine Fault in Westland, New Zealand, from ground penetrating radar profiling , 1998 .

[7]  R. Weldon,et al.  Late Cenozoic tectonics of the northwestern San Bernardino Mountains, southern California , 1989 .

[8]  Thierry Camelbeeck,et al.  Geological and geophysical evidence for large palaeo-earthquakes with surface faulting in the Roer Graben (northwest Europe) , 1998 .

[9]  Tom J. Temples,et al.  Ground-penetrating radar detection of small-scale channels, joints and faults in the unconsolidated sediments of the Atlantic Coastal Plain , 1996 .

[10]  J. Spotila,et al.  Fault interaction at the junction of the Transverse Ranges and Eastern California shear zone: a case study of intersecting faults , 2004 .

[11]  George A. McMechan,et al.  Application of ground-penetrating radar to investigation of near-surface fault properties in the San Francisco Bay region , 1996 .

[12]  D. P. Schwartz,et al.  Fault behavior and characteristic earthquakes: Examples from the Wasatch and San Andreas Fault Zones , 1984 .

[13]  K. Sieh,et al.  Long dormancy, low slip rate, and similar slip-per-event for the Emerson fault, eastern California shear zone , 1997 .

[14]  K. Sieh,et al.  Architecture of transpressional thrust faulting in the San Bernardino Mountains, southern California, from deformation of a deeply weathered surface , 2000 .

[15]  David R. Brillinger,et al.  A more precise chronology of earthquakes produced by the San Andreas fault in southern California , 1989 .

[16]  A. P. Annan,et al.  Water table detection with ground‐penetrating radar , 1991 .

[17]  G. McMechan,et al.  Detailed internal architecture of a fluvial channel sandstone determined from outcrop, cores, and 3-D ground-penetrating radar: Example from the middle Cretaceous Ferron Sandstone, east-central Utah , 2001 .

[18]  L. Blikra,et al.  Neotectonic faulting in northern Norway; the Stuoragurra and Nordmannvikdalen postglacial faults , 2000 .