PISA 2000 technical report

The OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) is a survey of the knowledge and skills of 15-year-olds in 32 industrialised countries. This technical report describes the methodology underlying PISA 2000 and contains detailed information on the implementation of the project which allows researchers to understand and replicate its analyses. Information is provided on the design, methodologies used to analyse the data, technical features of the project and quality control mechanisms.

[1]  I. Jolliffe,et al.  Nonlinear Multivariate Analysis , 1992 .

[2]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  The Dependability of Behavioral Measurements: Theory of Generalizability for Scores and Profiles. , 1974 .

[3]  G. Spache,et al.  A New Readability Formula for Primary-Grade Reading Materials , 1953, The Elementary School Journal.

[4]  K. Sirotnik.  An Analysis of Variance Framework for Matrix Sampling , 1970 .

[5]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1972, Predictive Analytics.

[6]  Emerald V. Dechant.  Understanding and Teaching Reading: An Interactive Model , 1991 .

[7]  K F Rust,et al.  Variance estimation for complex surveys using replication techniques , 1996, Statistical methods in medical research.

[8]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Strategies of discourse comprehension , 1986 .

[9]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Toward a model of text comprehension and production. , 1978 .

[10]  R. Clarke,et al.  Theory and Applications of Correspondence Analysis , 1985 .

[11]  Albert E. Beaton.  Implementing the New Design: The NAEP 1983-84 Technical Report. , 1987 .

[12]  J. Chall,et al.  A FORMULA FOR PREDICTING READABILITY , 1948 .

[13]  David E. Rumelhart,et al.  Toward an interactive model of reading. , 1994 .

[14]  W. Dixon,et al.  BMDP statistical software , 1983 .

[15]  Irwin S. Kirsch,et al.  Exploring Document Literacy: Variables Underlying the Performance of Young Adults. , 1990 .

[16]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[17]  Andreas Schleicher.  Measuring Student Knowledge and Skills: A New Framework for Assessment. , 1999 .

[18]  Warwick B. Elley,et al.  How in the World do Students Read , 1993 .

[19]  K. Wolter.  Introduction to Variance Estimation , 1985 .

[20]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Reliability and Predictive Validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (Mslq) , 1993 .

[21]  Carl-Erik Särndal,et al.  Model Assisted Survey Sampling , 1997 .

[22]  Joan Jamieson,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF A SCALE FOR ASSESSING THE LEVEL OF COMPUTER FAMILIARITY OF TOEFL EXAMINEES , 1998 .

[23]  S. R. Searle.  Linear Models , 1971 .

[24]  Raymond J. Adams,et al.  The Multidimensional Random Coefficients Multinomial Logit Model , 1997 .

[25]  Jeremy Kilpatrick,et al.  Apples and Oranges Again@@@The IEA Study of Mathematics I: Analysis of Mathematics Curricula@@@The IEA Study of Mathematics II: Contexts and Outcomes of School Mathematics , 1989 .

[26]  R. Flesch.  The Art of Readable Writing , 1974 .

[27]  R. Brennan.  Elements of generalizability theory , 1983 .

[28]  Robert J. Mislevy,et al.  Information Matrices in Latent-Variable Models , 1989 .

[29]  T. A. Warm.  Weighted likelihood estimation of ability in item response theory , 1989 .

[30]  Cathleen D. Rafferty.  Literacy in the Information Age. , 1999 .

[31]  Edward B. Fry,et al.  Fry's Readability Graph: Clarifications, Validity, and Extension to Level 17. , 1977 .

[32]  Gilbert de Landsheere.  Le test de closure: mesure de la lisibilité et de la compréhension , 1973 .