Acoustic Emission for In Situ Monitoring of Solid Materials Pre-Weakening by Electric Discharge: A Machine Learning Approach

Pre-weakening of solid materials using electric discharge is a new technique aiming at reducing significantly the costs and energy consumption as compared with the traditional raw materials processing in mining and recycling industries. However, the absence of an effective pre-weakening process monitoring and control prohibits its introduction into the market. The present contribution aims to fill this gap by investigating the feasibility of combining acoustic emission with machine learning for process monitoring. Hence, this paper is a supplement and enrichment of existing studies on in situ and real-time process monitoring and diagnosis associated with failure mechanism problems. Three categories and six subcategories are defined to describe the major pre-weakening scenarios of solid materials. The acoustic signals are collected and labeled according to the visual control of specially prepared transparent samples subjected to discharge exposure. The acoustic signals are decomposed with data adaptive $M$ -band wavelets and the relative energies of the extracted frequency bands are used as features. Principal component analysis is applied to select the most informative features whereas several classifiers are applied to recognize the pre-weakening quality. The classification accuracy of the defined categories ranges between 84–93% demonstrating the applicability of the proposed method for in situ and real-time control of pre-weakening of solid materials using electric discharge.

[1]  R. S. Sigmond,et al.  The corona discharge, its properties and specific uses , 1985 .

[2]  Ji Feng,et al.  Deep Forest: Towards An Alternative to Deep Neural Networks , 2017, IJCAI.

[3]  Corinna Cortes,et al.  Support-Vector Networks , 1995, Machine Learning.

[4]  M. Wilkins Calculation of Elastic-Plastic Flow , 1963 .

[5]  M. Ohtsu Recommendation of RILEM TC 212-ACD: acoustic emission and related NDE techniques for crack detection and damage evaluation in concrete* Test method for classification of active cracks in concrete structures by acoustic emission , 2010 .

[6]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  On denoising and best signal representation , 1999, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[7]  K. Xia,et al.  Suggestion of dielectric breakdown strength as dynamic fracture property of rock materials , 2013 .

[8]  M. Ohtsu Recommendation of RILEM TC 212-ACD: Acoustic emission and related NDE techniques for crack detection and damage evaluation in concrete: Measurement method for acoustic emission signals in concrete , 2010 .

[9]  Ian T. Jolliffe,et al.  Principal Component Analysis , 2002, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[10]  M. Ohtsu Acoustic Emission (AE) and Related Non-destructive Evaluation (NDE) Techniques in the Fracture Mechanics of Concrete: Fundamentals and Applications , 2015 .

[11]  Mitsuhiro Shigeishi,et al.  Acoustic emission sources of breakdown failure due to pulsed-electric discharge in concrete , 2011 .

[12]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  Matching pursuits with time-frequency dictionaries , 1993, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[13]  Bikas K. Chakrabarti,et al.  Book Review: Statistical Physics of Fracture and Breakdown in Disordered Systems , 1997 .

[14]  V. A. Vizir,et al.  High-voltage pulsed generator for dynamic fragmentation of rocks. , 2010, The Review of scientific instruments.

[15]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.

[16]  V. V. Burkin,et al.  Wave dynamics of electric explosion in solids , 2009 .

[17]  K. Dalen,et al.  Multi-Component Acoustic Characterization of Porous Media , 2013 .

[18]  Ivan Nunes da Silva,et al.  Artificial Neural Networks: A Practical Course , 2016 .

[19]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[20]  Desmond Tromans,et al.  Mineral comminution: Energy efficiency considerations , 2008 .

[21]  Fengnian Shi,et al.  Characterisation of pre-weakening effect on ores by high voltage electrical pulses based on single-particle tests , 2013 .

[22]  Deepen Sinha,et al.  On the optimal choice of a wavelet for signal representation , 1992, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[23]  A. Aldroubi,et al.  Families of multiresolution and wavelet spaces with optimal properties , 1993 .

[24]  D. G. Aggelis,et al.  Application of Acoustic Emission on the Characterization of Fracture in Textile Reinforced Cement Laminates , 2014, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[25]  C. Burrus,et al.  Optimal wavelet representation of signals and the wavelet sampling theorem , 1994 .

[26]  H. Bluhm Pulsed Power Systems: Principles and Applications , 2006 .

[27]  Alex Smola,et al.  Kernel methods in machine learning , 2007, math/0701907.

[28]  Shiv Dutt Joshi,et al.  A new approach for estimation of statistically matched wavelet , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[29]  Giuseppe Lacidogna,et al.  Heterogeneous materials in compression: Correlations between absorbed, released and acoustic emission energies , 2013 .

[30]  Luís Marcelo Tavares,et al.  Energy absorbed in breakage of single particles in drop weight testing , 1999 .