Replacing Alteplase with Tenecteplase: Is the Time Ripe?

Thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke has predominantly been with alteplase for over a quarter of a century. In recent years, with trials showing evidence of higher rates of successful reperfusion, similar safety profile and efficacy of tenecteplase (TNK) as compared to alteplase, TNK has now emerged as another potential choice for thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke. In this review, we will focus on these recent advances, aiming: (1) to provide a brief overview of thrombolysis in stroke; (2) to provide comparisons between alteplase and TNK for clinical, imaging, and safety outcomes; (3) to focus on key subgroups of interest to understand if there is an advantage of using TNK over alteplase or vice-versa, to review available evidence on role of TNK in intra-arterial thrombolysis, as bridging therapy and in mobile stroke units; and (4) to summarize what to expect in the near future from recently completed trials and propose areas for future research on this evolving topic. We present compelling data from several trials regarding the safety and efficacy of TNK in acute ischemic stroke along with completed yet unpublished trials that will help provide insight into these unanswered questions.

[1]  J. Grotta,et al.  How Frequent is the One-Hour tPA Infusion Interrupted or Delayed? , 2022, Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association.

[2]  Jillian M Hall,et al.  Tenecteplase Improves Door‐to‐Needle Time in Real‐World Acute Stroke Treatment , 2021, Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology.

[3]  S. Prabhakaran,et al.  Door-In-Door-Out Process Times at Primary Stroke Centers in Chicago. , 2021, Annals of emergency medicine.

[4]  A. Baird,et al.  Tenecteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment , 2021, Seminars in Neurology.

[5]  P. Armstrong,et al.  The Second Strategic Reperfusion Early After Myocardial Infarction (STREAM-2) study optimizing pharmacoinvasive reperfusion strategy in older ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients. , 2020, American heart journal.

[6]  S. Lageman,et al.  National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke , 2017 .

[7]  A. Majid,et al.  The Influence of Bolus to Infusion Delays on Plasma Tissue Plasminogen Activator Levels , 2014, International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society.

[8]  J. Brophy,et al.  Fibrinolysis or primary PCI in myocardial infarction. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  P. Armstrong,et al.  Impact of TIMI 3 patency before primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction on clinical outcome: results from the ASSENT-4 PCI study , 2012, European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care.

[10]  B. Kissela,et al.  Eligibility for Intravenous Recombinant Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator Within a Population: The Effect of the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS) III Trial , 2012, Stroke.

[11]  G. Ford,et al.  Pharmacokinetics of alteplase in the treatment of ischaemic stroke , 2012, Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology.

[12]  S. Warach,et al.  Intravenous desmoteplase in patients with acute ischaemic stroke selected by MRI perfusion–diffusion weighted imaging or perfusion CT (DIAS-2): a prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study , 2009, The Lancet Neurology.

[13]  R. Giugliano,et al.  2004 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with STEMI: the implications for clinicians , 2005, Nature Clinical Practice Cardiovascular Medicine.

[14]  T. Walter,et al.  Absence of paradoxical thrombin activation by fibrin-specific thrombolytics in acute myocardial infarction: comparison of single-bolus tenecteplase and front-loaded alteplase. , 2002, Thrombosis research.

[15]  G. Albers,et al.  ATLANTIS Trial: Results for Patients Treated Within 3 Hours of Stroke Onset , 2002, Stroke.

[16]  G. Albers,et al.  Recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (Alteplase) for ischemic stroke 3 to 5 hours after symptom onset. The ATLANTIS Study: a randomized controlled trial. Alteplase Thrombolysis for Acute Noninterventional Therapy in Ischemic Stroke. , 1999, JAMA.

[17]  E. Lesaffre,et al.  Neurological deterioration in acute ischemic stroke: potential predictors and associated factors in the European cooperative acute stroke study (ECASS) I. , 1999, Stroke.

[18]  G Barbash,et al.  Single-bolus tenecteplase compared with front-loaded alteplase in acute myocardial infarction: the ASSENT-2 double-blind randomised trial , 1999, The Lancet.

[19]  M. Kaste,et al.  Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of thrombolytic therapy with intravenous alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke (ECASS II) , 1998, The Lancet.

[20]  G. Hankey,et al.  Streptokinase for acute ischemic stroke with relationship to time of administration: Australian Streptokinase (ASK) Trial Study Group. , 1996, JAMA.

[21]  M. Hommel,et al.  Thrombolytic therapy with streptokinase in acute ischemic stroke. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  Multicentre Acute Stroke Trial—Italy Group Randomised controlled trial of streptokinase, aspirin, and combination of both in treatment of acute ischaemic stroke , 1995, The Lancet.