Conflicting rationalities: implications for planning theory and ethics

The article argues that while certain recent planning theories have attempted to take account of social difference and multiculturalism, there is not yet sufficient recognition of just how deep difference can be, and how planners can frequently find themselves in situations characterized by conflicting rationalities. The article draws on a case of an attempted informal settlement upgrade in Cape Town, South Africa, to illustrate the gap between the notion of ‘proper citizens’ and ‘proper living environments’ espoused by the municipality, and the nature of the rationality guiding the actions of certain of the other parties involved. This understanding, it is suggested, has important implications for both planning theory and ethics.

[1]  D. Haraway.  Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature , 1990 .

[2]  H. Campbell.  Planning: an idea of value , 2002 .

[3]  G. Mohan.  Developing differences: post‐structuralism & political economy in contemporary development studies , 1997 .

[4]  L. Sandercock.  Negotiating fear and desire , 2000 .

[5]  M Tewdwr-Jones,et al.  Deconstructing Communicative Rationality: A Critique of Habermasian Collaborative Planning , 1998 .

[6]  I. Chipkin.  'Functional' and 'Dysfunctional' Communities: The Making of National Citizens , 2003 .

[7]  S. Robins.  Whose Modernity? Indigenous Modernities and Land Claims after Apartheid , 2003 .

[8]  B. Flyvbjerg.  Making Social Science Matter , 2001 .

[9]  S. Harrison.  Rationality and Power: Democracy in Practice , 2001 .

[10]  Vanessa Watson,et al.  Do We Learn from Planning Practice? , 2002 .

[11]  P. Healey.  Planning through debate: the communicative turn in planning theory , 1992 .

[12]  Margo Huxley,et al.  Debating Dominence and Relevance: Notes on the ‘Communicative Turn’ in Planning Theory , 2000 .

[13]  E. Gualini.  Planning and the intelligence of institutions , 2001 .

[14]  Margo Huxley,et al.  The Limits to Communicative Planning , 2000 .

[15]  P. Healey.  Institutionalist Analysis, Communicative Planning, and Shaping Places , 1999 .

[16]  Ann-Katrin Bäcklund,et al.  L. Sandercock: Towards Cosmopolis - Planning for Multicultural Cities. Wiley, Chichester 1998. 258 s., ill., 24cm. GBP 16,-. , 1998 .

[17]  J. Habermas.  Theory of Communicative Action , 1981 .

[18]  O. Yiftachel,et al.  New Paradigm or Old Myopia? Unsettling the Communicative Turn in Planning Theory , 2000 .

[19]  S. Abram.  Planning the Public: Some Comments on Empirical Problems for Planning Theory , 2000 .

[20]  L. Sandercock,et al.  Towards Cosmopolis: Planning for Multicultural Cities , 1997 .

[21]  Raphaël Fischler,et al.  Communicative Planning Theory: A Foucauldian Assessment , 2000 .

[22]  P. Wilkinson,et al.  Domestic diversity and fluidity among some African households in Greater Cape Town , 1996 .

[23]  K. Hungwe,et al.  Africa works: disorder as political instrument , 2000 .

[24]  Filip De Boeck.  Postcolonialism, Power and Identity: Local and global Perspectives from Zaire , 1996 .

[25]  N. Harris.  Practice Through a Lens: A Metaphor for Planning Theory , 2000 .

[26]  V. Watson.  The Usefulness of Normative Planning Theories in the Context of Sub-Saharan Africa , 2002 .

[27]  M. Neuman.  Communicate This! Does Consensus Lead to Advocacy and Pluralism? , 2000 .

[28]  C. Allen.  Who needs civil society , 1997 .