Prestained and Preloaded DMEK Grafts: An Evaluation of Tissue Quality and Stain Retention

Purpose: To examine endothelial cell damage and stain retention of prestained preloaded Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) grafts. Methods: DMEK grafts were stained with trypan blue or left unstained before loading into a Straiko modified Jones tube. A protocol to stain preloaded grafts inside the modified Jones tube and resulting cell loss was also examined. Endothelial cell loss was determined by vital dye staining after 3 days of cold storage and compared between the 3 groups. Eight additional grafts were stained, loaded, and shipped from Oregon to New York to assess stain stability. Stain retention and the ability to successfully inject and open these “prestained preloaded” grafts in cadaveric donor eyes were also evaluated. Results: Unstained preloaded DMEK grafts showed an overall cell loss of 15% ± 3% [95% confidence interval (CI), 11%–18%]. Prestained grafts had a cell loss of 16% ± 4% (95% CI, 10%–22%) and were not significantly different from unstained grafts (P = 1). Grafts stained while inside the modified Jones tubes had an average cell loss of 18% ± 2% (95% CI, 16%–20%, Pprestained = 0.15, Punstained = 0.09). All grafts shipped across the country and examined 3 days after preparation showed a decrease in stain intensity but were still deemed suitable for transplantation by an experienced DMEK surgeon. Conclusions: It is possible to prestain and preload DMEK grafts without inducing additional endothelial cell loss. Consideration should be given to the interval between staining and surgery because stain can fade.

[1]  Christopher G. Stoeger,et al.  Evaluation and Quality Assessment of Prestripped, Preloaded Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Grafts , 2017, Cornea.

[2]  P. Majmudar,et al.  Enhancing DMEK Success by Identifying Optimal Levels of Trypan Blue Dye Application to Donor Corneal Tissue , 2017, Cornea.

[3]  S. Ferrari,et al.  Preloaded Tissues for Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty. , 2016, American journal of ophthalmology.

[4]  Christopher G. Stoeger,et al.  Quantification and Patterns of Endothelial Cell Loss Due to Eye Bank Preparation and Injector Method in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Tissues , 2016, Cornea.

[5]  Christopher G. Stoeger,et al.  Stamping an S on DMEK Donor Tissue to Prevent Upside-Down Grafts: Laboratory Validation and Detailed Preparation Technique Description , 2015, Cornea.

[6]  Z. M. Mayko,et al.  Standardized DMEK Technique: Reducing Complications Using Prestripped Tissue, Novel Glass Injector, and Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) Gas , 2015, Cornea.

[7]  Christopher G. Stoeger,et al.  Imaging and Quantification of Endothelial Cell Loss in Eye Bank Prepared DMEK Grafts Using Trainable Segmentation Software , 2014, Current eye research.

[8]  F. Price,et al.  Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Donor Preparation: Navigating Challenges and Improving Efficiency , 2014, Cornea.

[9]  K. Bartz-Schmidt,et al.  Novel Maneuver Facilitating Descemet Membrane Unfolding in the Anterior Chamber , 2013, Cornea.

[10]  I. Dapena,et al.  Intraocular graft unfolding techniques in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. , 2013, JAMA ophthalmology.

[11]  Johannes E. Schindelin,et al.  Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.