Efficient modelling of beam-like structures with general non-prismatic, curved geometry

Abstract The analysis of three-dimensional (3D) stress states can be complex and computationally expensive, especially when large deflections cause a nonlinear structural response. Slender structures are conventionally modelled as one-dimensional beams but even these rather simpler analyses can become complicated, e.g. for variable cross-sections and planforms (i.e. non-prismatic curved beams). In this paper, we present an alternative procedure based on the recently developed Unified Formulation in which the kinematic description of a beam builds upon two shape functions, one for the beam’s axis, the other for its cross-section. This approach predicts 3D displacement and stress fields accurately and is computationally efficient in comparison with 3D finite elements. However, current modelling capabilities are limited to the use of prismatic elements. As a means for further applicability, we propose a method to create beam elements with variable planform and variable cross-section, i.e. of general shape. This method employs an additional set of shape functions which describes the geometry of the structure exactly. These functions are different from those used for describing the kinematics and provide local curvilinear basis vectors upon which 3D Jacobian transformation matrices are produced to define non-prismatic elements. The model proposed is benchmarked against 3D finite element analyses, as well as analytical and experimental results available in the literature. Significant computational efficiency gains over 3D finite elements are observed for similar levels of accuracy, for both linear and geometrically nonlinear analyses.

[1]  X. G. Yang,et al.  An improved model for naturally curved and twisted composite beams with closed thin-walled sections , 2011 .

[2]  Paul M. Weaver,et al.  Simplified analytical model for tapered sandwich beams using variable stiffness materials , 2017 .

[3]  Erasmo Carrera,et al.  Micromechanical Progressive Failure Analysis of Fiber-Reinforced Composite Using Refined Beam Models , 2017 .

[4]  Josef Eberhardsteiner,et al.  Non-prismatic beams: A simple and effective Timoshenko-like model , 2016 .

[5]  Alfonso Pagani,et al.  Exact solutions for free vibration analysis of laminated, box and sandwich beams by refined layer-wise theory , 2017 .

[6]  P. Weaver,et al.  Efficient 3D Stress Capture of Variable-Stiffness and Sandwich Beam Structures , 2019, AIAA Journal.

[7]  Michel Géradin,et al.  Finite element theory for curved and twisted beams based on exact solutions for three-dimensional solids. Part 1: Beam concept and geometrically exact nonlinear formulation , 1998 .

[8]  Suong V. Hoa,et al.  Interlaminar stresses in tapered laminates , 1988 .

[9]  Reza Attarnejad,et al.  Derivation of an Efficient Non-Prismatic Thin Curved Beam Element Using Basic Displacement Functions , 2012 .

[10]  Gaetano Giunta,et al.  A modern and compact way to formulate classical and advanced beam theories , 2010 .

[11]  P. Ermanni,et al.  Stiffness analysis of corrugated laminates under large deformation , 2017 .

[12]  Erasmo Carrera,et al.  Finite Element Analysis of Structures through Unified Formulation , 2014 .

[13]  Anthony J. Vizzini,et al.  Failure of Sandwich to Laminate Tapered Composite Structures , 1995 .

[14]  Donald E. Carlson,et al.  Determination of the stretch and rotation in the polar decomposition of the deformation gradient , 1984 .

[15]  Cv Clemens Verhoosel,et al.  Non-Linear Finite Element Analysis of Solids and Structures , 1991 .

[16]  Paul M. Weaver,et al.  Three-dimensional stress analysis for beam-like structures using Serendipity Lagrange shape functions , 2018, International Journal of Solids and Structures.

[17]  M. Petrolo,et al.  Accurate evaluation of failure indices of composite layered structures via various FE models , 2018, Composites Science and Technology.

[18]  T. Belytschko,et al.  Applications of higher order corotational stretch theories to nonlinear finite element analysis , 1979 .

[19]  Erasmo Carrera,et al.  Exact solutions for static analysis of laminated, box and sandwich beams by refined layer-wise theory , 2017 .

[20]  Erik Lund,et al.  Failure optimization of geometrically linear/nonlinear laminated composite structures using a two-step hierarchical model adaptivity , 2009 .

[21]  S. Minera,et al.  Three-dimensional stress analysis for laminated composite and sandwich structures , 2018, Composites Part B: Engineering.

[22]  C.-H. Lu,et al.  Bending of Anisotropic Sandwich Beams with Variable Thickness , 1994 .

[23]  O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.  The Finite Element Method: Its Basis and Fundamentals , 2005 .

[24]  Reza Attarnejad,et al.  Analysis of Non-Prismatic Timoshenko Beams Using Basic Displacement Functions , 2011 .

[25]  Giulio Alfano,et al.  Analytical derivation of a general 2D non-prismatic beam model based on the Hellinger–Reissner principle , 2015 .

[26]  Buntara Sthenly Gan,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF CONSISTENT SHAPE FUNCTIONS FOR LINEARLY SOLID TAPERED TIMOSHENKO BEAM , 2015 .

[27]  C. Hong,et al.  Bending of tapered anisotropic sandwich plates with arbitrary edge conditions , 1992 .

[28]  Josef Füssl,et al.  Stress recovery from one dimensional models for tapered bi-symmetric thin-walled I beams: Deficiencies in modern engineering tools and procedures , 2017 .

[29]  Chang-New Chen DQEM analysis of in-plane vibration of curved beam structures , 2005, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[30]  Dewey H. Hodges,et al.  Stress and strain recovery for the in-plane deformation of an isotropic tapered strip-beam , 2010 .

[31]  Andrew Oliver,et al.  Bending Stresses of Steel Web Tapered Tee Section Cantilevers , 2013 .

[32]  E. Carrera,et al.  Strong and weak form solutions of curved beams via Carrera’s unified formulation , 2018, Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures.

[33]  K. Bathe Finite Element Procedures , 1995 .

[34]  K. Saha,et al.  A Review on Stress and Deformation Analysis of Curved Beams under Large Deflection , 2017 .

[35]  E. Carrera,et al.  The analysis of tapered structures using a component-wise approach based on refined one-dimensional models , 2017 .

[36]  Ghodrat Karami,et al.  In-plane free vibration analysis of circular arches with varying cross-sections using differential quadrature method , 2004 .

[37]  Erasmo Carrera,et al.  Unified formulation of geometrically nonlinear refined beam theories , 2018 .

[38]  Erasmo Carrera,et al.  A global-local approach for the elastoplastic analysis of compact and thin-walled structures via refined models , 2018, Computers & Structures.

[39]  Erasmo Carrera,et al.  One-dimensional finite element formulation with node-dependent kinematics , 2017 .

[40]  M. Radwaǹska,et al.  Plate and Shell Structures: Selected Analytical and Finite Element Solutions , 2017 .

[41]  Ferdinando Auricchio,et al.  Planar Timoshenko-like model for multilayer non-prismatic beams , 2018 .

[42]  Karan S. Surana,et al.  Geometrically non-linear formulation for three dimensional curved beam elements with large rotations , 1989 .

[43]  C. Franciosi,et al.  Exact and approximate dynamic analysis of circular arches using DQM , 2000 .

[44]  P. Weaver,et al.  Comparison of weak and strong formulations for 3D stress predictions of composite beam structures , 2019 .

[45]  E. Carrera,et al.  Refined beam elements with arbitrary cross-section geometries , 2010 .

[46]  J. R. Banerjee,et al.  Linearized buckling analysis of isotropic and composite beam-columns by Carrera Unified Formulation and dynamic stiffness method , 2016 .

[47]  A. Ibrahimbegovic On finite element implementation of geometrically nonlinear Reissner's beam theory: three-dimensional curved beam elements , 1995 .

[48]  Erasmo Carrera,et al.  Carrera Unified Formulation for Free-Vibration Analysis of Aircraft Structures , 2016 .

[49]  Chiara Bisagni,et al.  Single-Stringer Compression Specimen for the Assessment of Damage Tolerance of Postbuckled Structures , 2011 .

[50]  A. Ibrahimbegovic,et al.  Finite element analysis of linear and non‐linear planar deformations of elastic initially curved beams , 1993 .

[51]  P. Ermanni,et al.  Non-linear stiffness response of corrugated laminates in tensile loading , 2016 .

[52]  L. W. Glaum DIRECT ITERATION AND PERTURBATION METHODS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF NONLINEAR STRUCTURES. , 1976 .

[53]  E. Carrera,et al.  Analysis of tapered composite structures using a refined beam theory , 2018 .

[54]  Erasmo Carrera,et al.  Large-deflection and post-buckling analyses of laminated composite beams by Carrera Unified Formulation , 2017 .