Collective decision making and social interaction rules in mixed-species flocks of songbirds

[1]  Damien R. Farine,et al.  Individual-level personality influences social foraging and collective behaviour in wild birds , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  D. Farine,et al.  Mixed-species associations can arise without heterospecific attraction , 2014 .

[3]  D. Sumpter,et al.  A model comparison reveals dynamic social information drives the movements of humbug damselfish (Dascyllus aruanus) , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[4]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[5]  The early bird gets the worm: foraging strategies of wild songbirds lead to the early discovery of food sources , 2013, Biology Letters.

[6]  Damien R. Farine,et al.  Animal social network inference and permutations for ecologists in R using asnipe , 2013 .

[7]  A Cockburn,et al.  Individual personalities predict social behaviour in wild networks of great tits (Parus major). , 2013, Ecology letters.

[8]  Simon Garnier,et al.  Estimation models describe well collective decisions among three options , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  L. Aplin,et al.  Milk bottles revisited: social learning and individual variation in the blue tit, Cyanistes caeruleus , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  A. Thornton,et al.  Heterogeneous structure in mixed-species corvid flocks in flight , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  Andrew T. Hartnett,et al.  Both information and social cohesion determine collective decisions in animal groups , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  D. Farine.  Emergent social structure and collective behaviour from individual decision-making in wild birds , 2013 .

[13]  Damien R. Farine,et al.  Social organisation of thornbill-dominated mixed-species flocks using social network analysis , 2012, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[14]  Iead Rezek,et al.  Inferring social network structure in ecological systems from spatio-temporal data streams , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[15]  D. Farine,et al.  Social network analysis of mixed-species flocks: exploring the structure and evolution of interspecific social behaviour , 2012, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  D. Farine,et al.  Social networks predict patch discovery in a wild population of songbirds , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  I. Couzin,et al.  Predatory Fish Select for Coordinated Collective Motion in Virtual Prey , 2012, Science.

[18]  Andrea Perna,et al.  The modelling cycle for collective animal behaviour , 2012, Interface Focus.

[19]  A. Pérez-Escudero,et al.  A common rule for decision making in animal collectives across species , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  D. Sumpter,et al.  Quorum Decision-Making in Foraging Fish Shoals , 2012, PloS one.

[21]  D. Sumpter,et al.  Inferring the rules of interaction of shoaling fish , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Richard P. Mann,et al.  Bayesian Inference for Identifying Interaction Rules in Moving Animal Groups , 2011, PloS one.

[23]  I. Couzin,et al.  Inferring the structure and dynamics of interactions in schooling fish , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Alfonso Pérez-Escudero,et al.  Collective Animal Behavior from Bayesian Estimation and Probability Matching , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[25]  M. Whitehouse,et al.  Mixed-species flocks: an example of niche construction? , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[26]  D. Sumpter,et al.  Fast and accurate decisions through collective vigilance in fish shoals , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  D. Sumpter.  Collective Animal Behavior , 2010 .

[28]  I. Couzin,et al.  Social interactions, information use, and the evolution of collective migration , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Kartik Shanker,et al.  Why do birds participate in mixed-species foraging flocks? A large-scale synthesis , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[30]  I. Couzin.  Collective cognition in animal groups , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[31]  D. Stephens.  Decision ecology: Foraging and the ecology of animal decision making , 2008, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[32]  D. Sumpter,et al.  Consensus Decision Making by Fish , 2008, Current Biology.

[33]  Paul J. B. Hart,et al.  Quorum decision-making facilitates information transfer in fish shoals , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  G. Parisi,et al.  Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: Evidence from a field study , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Mikko Mönkkönen,et al.  Social information use is a process across time, space, and ecology, reaching heterospecifics. , 2007, Ecology.

[36]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  Foraging : behavior and ecology , 2007 .

[37]  Joseph J. Hale,et al.  From Disorder to Order in Marching Locusts , 2006, Science.

[38]  José Halloy,et al.  Collegial decision making based on social amplification leads to optimal group formation. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  D. Sumpter.  The principles of collective animal behaviour , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[40]  W. Cresswell,et al.  Faced with a choice, sparrowhawks more often attack the more vulnerable prey group , 2004 .

[41]  C. Chamley.  Rational Herds: Economic Models of Social Learning , 2003 .

[42]  I. Couzin,et al.  Self-Organization and Collective Behavior in Vertebrates , 2003 .

[43]  R. R. Krausz.  Living in Groups , 2013 .

[44]  Steven V. Viscido,et al.  The dilemma of the selfish herd: the search for a realistic movement rule. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[45]  R. Greenberg.  Birds of Many Feathers: The Formation and Structure of Mixed Species Flocks of Forest Birds , 2001 .

[46]  J. Godin,et al.  The social organization of free‐ranging fish shoals , 2000 .

[47]  T. Grubb,et al.  Social context affects risk taking by a satellite species in a mixed-species foraging group , 2000 .

[48]  J. Beecham,et al.  Animal group forces resulting from predator avoidance and competition minimization , 1999, Journal of theoretical biology.

[49]  C. Fitzgibbon.  Mixed-species grouping in Thomson's and Grant's gazelles: the antipredator benefits , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[50]  A. Houston,et al.  Switching between resources and the ideal free distribution , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[51]  W. Hamilton.  Geometry for the selfish herd. , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.

[52]  D. H. Morse,et al.  Ecological Aspects of Some Mixed-Species Foraging Flocks of Birds , 1970 .

[53]  R. Hinde,et al.  Advances in the study of behavior , 1966 .

[54]  C. Elton.  Interspecific Competition , 1957, Nature.

[55]  E. P..  Animal Behaviour , 1901, Nature.