Achieving reliable coincidence resolving time measurement of PET detectors using multichannel waveform digitizer based on DRS4 chip

Coincidence resolving time (CRT) is one of the most important physical-performance measures for positron emission tomography (PET), as reconstruction with accurate time-of-flight information enhances the lesion detectability in patient studies. Accordingly, various PET detector designs and high-performance front-end readout circuits have been actively investigated to improve timing performance. The resulting PET detectors are often evaluated using multichannel waveform digitizers for versatile data analysis of the output signals. However, we have found that inappropriate data acquisition (DAQ) using a multichannel waveform digitizer based on the domino-ring-sampler 4 (DRS4) chip can lead to a considerable error when determining CRT. To address this issue, we performed CRT measurements using a pair of Hamamatsu R9800 photomultiplier tube based PET detectors. Then, considering intra- and inter-chip sampling, we employed four different combinations of input channels into the CAEN DT5742B waveform digitizer and obtained 2D CRT maps according to the leading-edge discriminator threshold for assessing each DAQ scheme. The intra-chip CRT measurement exhibited unusual streak patterns in the 2D CRT map and yielded the artificially-low CRT information in PET detector pairs, whereas the inter-chip CRT measurement provided the reliable estimation of timing resolution. Further, we could prevent the high-frequency signal crosstalk among input channels within the DRS4 chip using the inter-chip CRT measurement. We expect that our findings will also be useful for achieving the reliable CRT measurements when using other single-chip-based multichannel waveform digitizers.

[1]  Suleman Surti,et al.  Benefit of Time-of-Flight in PET: Experimental and Clinical Results , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  William W. Moses Recent Advances and Future Advances in Time-of-Flight PET. , 2007 .

[3]  Craig S. Levin,et al.  Readout Electronics and Data Acquisition of a Positron Emission Tomography Time-of-Flight Detector Module With Waveform Digitizer , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[4]  Suleman Surti,et al.  Update on Time-of-Flight PET Imaging , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[5]  Claudio Piemonte,et al.  A compact, high-density gamma-detection module for Time-of-Flight measurements in PET applications , 2016 .

[6]  P. Murat,et al.  A feasibility study of a PET/MRI insert detector using strip-line and waveform sampling data acquisition. , 2015, Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section A, Accelerators, spectrometers, detectors and associated equipment.

[7]  Haewook Park,et al.  Hybrid charge division multiplexing method for silicon photomultiplier based PET detectors , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  C. Levin,et al.  Optimizing timing performance of silicon photomultiplier-based scintillation detectors , 2012, 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[9]  Kenji Shimazoe,et al.  The current mode Time-over-Threshold ASIC for a MPPC module in a TOF-PET system , 2017, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment.

[10]  Guen Bae Ko,et al.  Proof‐of‐concept prototype time‐of‐flight PET system based on high‐quantum‐efficiency multianode PMTs , 2017, Medical physics.

[11]  J. Varela,et al.  TOFPET 2: A high-performance circuit for PET time-of-flight , 2016 .

[12]  C. Levin,et al.  Time-over-threshold for pulse shape discrimination in a time-of-flight phoswich PET detector , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  N. Shah,et al.  A new PET detector concept for compact preclinical high-resolution hybrid MR-PET , 2018 .

[14]  S. Ritt,et al.  Novel Calibration Method for Switched Capacitor Arrays Enables Time Measurements With Sub-Picosecond Resolution , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[15]  M. Albrow,et al.  A SiPM-based TOF-PET detector with high speed digital DRS4 readout , 2013 .

[16]  Jae Sung Lee,et al.  Delay grid multiplexing: simple time-based multiplexing and readout method for silicon photomultipliers , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  D. Schaart,et al.  Ultra precise timing with SiPM-based TOF PET scintillation detectors , 2009, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[18]  M. V. Nemallapudi,et al.  Sub-100 ps coincidence time resolution for positron emission tomography with LSO:Ce codoped with Ca , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  M. V. Nemallapudi,et al.  State of the art timing in TOF-PET detectors with LuAG, GAGG and L(Y)SO scintillators of various sizes coupled to FBK-SiPMs , 2016 .

[20]  Alberto Gola,et al.  Bismuth germanate coupled to near ultraviolet silicon photomultipliers for time-of-flight PET , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  Maurizio Conti,et al.  Improving time resolution in time-of-flight PET , 2011 .

[22]  Y. Munwes,et al.  A Silicon Photomultiplier Readout ASIC for Time-of-Flight Applications Using a New Time-of-Recovery Method , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[23]  D R Schaart,et al.  BGO as a hybrid scintillator / Cherenkov radiator for cost-effective time-of-flight PET , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  Saurav Z. K. Sajib,et al.  Electrodeless conductivity tensor imaging (CTI) using MRI: basic theory and animal experiments , 2018, Biomedical Engineering Letters.

[25]  Jun Yeon Won,et al.  Performance of a new accelerating-electrode-equipped fast-time-response PMT coupled with fast LGSO , 2018, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  J. Karp,et al.  Investigating CeBr3 for ultra-fast TOF-PET detector designs , 2016, 2016 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium, Medical Imaging Conference and Room-Temperature Semiconductor Detector Workshop (NSS/MIC/RTSD).

[28]  Roberto Dinapoli,et al.  Application of the DRS chip for fast waveform digitizing , 2010 .

[29]  J. Karp,et al.  Improvement in Lesion Detection with Whole-Body Oncologic Time-of-Flight PET , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[30]  Chulhong Kim,et al.  Contrast-enhanced dual mode imaging: photoacoustic imaging plus more , 2017, Biomedical engineering letters.

[31]  Stefan Ritt,et al.  Design and performance of the 6 GHz waveform digitizing chip DRS4 , 2008, 2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[32]  Hyun Woo Kwon,et al.  FDG Whole-Body PET/MRI in Oncology: a Systematic Review , 2017, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[33]  F. Beekman,et al.  LaBr3:Ce and SiPMs for time-of-flight PET: achieving 100 ps coincidence resolving time , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[34]  J. Uribe,et al.  Studies of a Next-Generation Silicon-Photomultiplier–Based Time-of-Flight PET/CT System , 2017, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[35]  G. Ko,et al.  Single transmission-line readout method for silicon photomultiplier based time-of-flight and depth-of-interaction PET , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.