Design and Performance of Well-Performing Railway Transitions

This paper presents a review of railroad track transition behavior, causes of undesirable transition performance, and designs that have exhibited desirable transition performance as determined by field measurements. The first focus of the paper is a review of common factors that lead to transition geometry deviations. These deviations involve the inherent problem of a train passing from an earthen and ballasted approach to a nearly rigid bridge structure. The differential movement between the earthen approach and bridge usually results in increased dynamic loads. These increased dynamic loads can be avoided if all transient and permanent displacements between the approach and bridge deck are balanced by reducing ballast and subgrade settlements in the approach and decreasing the stiffness of the bridge. Two well-performing bridge transitions were monitored by using noninvasive accelerometers to illustrate design techniques that can balance transition differential movements and thus reduce dynamic loads. Other design techniques and ballast remedial measures are discussed because of their relevance to reducing ballast settlement in the approach.

[1]  Dingqing Li,et al.  Transition of Railroad Bridge Approaches , 2005 .

[2]  Theodore R. Sussmann,et al.  Effect of Unsupported Ties at Transition Zones , 2015 .

[3]  Jerry G. Rose,et al.  In-Situ Test Measurement Techniques Within Railway Track Structures , 2008 .

[4]  Peter Schneider,et al.  In situ performance of a ballasted railway track with under sleeper pads , 2011 .

[5]  Erol Tutumluer,et al.  Investigation of differential movement at railroad bridge approaches through geotechnical instrumentation , 2012 .

[6]  Jean-Louis Briaud,et al.  Preliminary Evaluation of the Bump at the End of the Railway Bridge , 2011 .

[7]  Stephen T. Wilk,et al.  Tie-Ballast Interaction at Railroad Transitions , 2015 .

[8]  Rolf Dollevoet,et al.  Analysis of the Dynamic Behaviour of a Railway Track in Transition Zones With Differential Settlement , 2015 .

[9]  Carlton L. Ho,et al.  Effect of Moisture on the Engineering Characteristics of Fouled Ballast , 2014 .

[10]  Yu Qian,et al.  Ballast Settlement Ramp to Mitigate Differential Settlement in a Bridge Transition Zone , 2015 .

[11]  Jerry G. Rose,et al.  Evaluating tie support at railway bridge transitions , 2016 .

[12]  Dingqing Li,et al.  Heavy Axle Load Revenue Service Bridge Approach Problems and Remedies , 2015 .

[13]  Sanjay Nimbalkar,et al.  Assessment of ballast fouling and its implications on track drainage , 2012 .

[14]  William Powrie,et al.  An Assessment of Transition Zone Performance , 2011 .

[15]  Rui Calçada,et al.  Design and construction of backfills for railway track transition zones , 2015 .

[16]  Jerry G. Rose,et al.  Design and monitoring of well-performing bridge transitions , 2015 .

[17]  Yunmin Chen,et al.  Cumulative settlement of track subgrade in high-speed railway under varying water levels , 2014 .

[18]  Erol Tutumluer,et al.  Effects of Ballast Degradation on Permanent Deformation Behavior From Large-Scale Triaxial Tests , 2014 .

[19]  Dingqing Li,et al.  Railway Bridge Approaches under Heavy Axle Load Traffic: Problems, Causes, and Remedies , 2010 .

[20]  Carlton L. Ho,et al.  Use of seismic surface wave testing to assess track substructure condition , 2017 .

[21]  Reginald R. Souleyrette,et al.  Use of Matrix-Based Tactile Surface Sensors to Assess Fine-Scale Ballast–Tie Interface Pressure Distribution in Railroad Track , 2015 .

[22]  Priyan Mendis,et al.  A Review of Behaviour of Prestressed Concrete Sleepers , 2013, Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering.

[23]  Stephen T. Wilk,et al.  Evaluation of Tie Support at Transition Zones , 2015 .