On Optimization of the Importance Weighted OWA Aggregation of Multiple Criteria

The problem of aggregating multiple numerical criteria to form overall objective functions is of considerable importance in many disciplines. The ordered weighted averaging (OWA) aggregation, introduced by Yager, uses the weights assigned to the ordered values rather than to the specific criteria. This allows one to model various aggregation preferences, preserving simultaneously the impartiality (neutrality) with respect to the individual criteria. However, importance weighted averaging is a central task in multicriteria decision problems of many kinds. It can be achieved with the Weighted OWA (WOWA) aggregation though the importance weights make the WOWA concept much more complicated than the original OWA. We show that the WOWA aggregation with monotonic preferential weights can be reformulated in a way allowing to introduce linear programming optimization models, similar to the optimization models we developed earlier for the OWA aggregation. Computational efficiency of the proposed models is demonstrated.

[1]  David F. Nettleton,et al.  Processing and representation of meta-data for sleep apnea diagnosis with an artificial intelligence approach , 2001, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[2]  R. Słowiński Fuzzy sets in decision analysis, operations research and statistics , 1999 .

[3]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decisionmaking , 1988, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[4]  F. Glover,et al.  The simplex SON algorithm for LP/embedded network problems , 1981 .

[5]  H. Larsen,et al.  Importance weighted OWA aggregation of multicriteria queries , 1999, 18th International Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society - NAFIPS (Cat. No.99TH8397).

[6]  Wlodzimierz Ogryczak,et al.  On solving linear programs with the ordered weighted averaging objective , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision-making , 1988 .

[8]  Xinwang Liu,et al.  Some properties of the weighted OWA operator , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[9]  Włodzimierz Ogryczak,et al.  Multiple criteria optimization and decisions under risk , 2002 .

[10]  Vicenç Torra,et al.  The WOWA operator and the interpolation function W*: Chen and Otto's interpolation method revisited , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[11]  V. Torra The weighted OWA operator , 1997, International Journal of Intelligent Systems.

[12]  Aïda Valls,et al.  Using classification as an aggregation tool in MCDM , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[13]  Włodzimierz Ogryczak,et al.  On goal programming formulations of the reference point method , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[14]  Marc Roubens,et al.  Fuzzy Preference Modelling and Multicriteria Decision Support , 1994, Theory and Decision Library.

[15]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  Constrained OWA aggregation , 1996, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[16]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  Including importances in OWA aggregations using fuzzy systems modeling , 1998, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[17]  Michel Grabisch,et al.  Fuzzy aggregation of numerical preferences , 1999 .

[18]  J. Kacprzyk,et al.  The Ordered Weighted Averaging Operators: Theory and Applications , 1997 .

[19]  Janusz Kacprzyk,et al.  The Ordered Weighted Averaging Operators , 1997 .

[20]  R. Yager Quantifier guided aggregation using OWA operators , 1996, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[21]  Włodzimierz Ogryczak,et al.  On equitable approaches to resource allocation problems: the conditional minimax solutions , 2002 .

[22]  Ernesto Damiani,et al.  A WOWA-based Aggregation Technique on Trust Values Connected to Metadata , 2005, STM.

[23]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  Essentials of fuzzy modeling and control , 1994 .