Learner motivation for MOOC registration and the role of MOOCs as a university ‘taster’

Despite the widespread adoption of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs), no business model has emerged to make them sustainable from an institution standpoint. Using MOOCs as a marketing platform shows promise; but for this to succeed, it is necessary to understand the motivations of those who undertake them and to demonstrate how these same motivations can be better satisfied through enrolment in a fee-paying university course. We discuss the motivations for students as they progress through a MOOC and the factors that might lead to subsequent university enrolment. Our arguments are informed by MOOC statistics, the AIDA (attention, interest, desire, action) marketing model, and the literature on adult education, technology adoption, goal seeking and consumer value. We argue that most students are led to MOOC enrolment through close alignment of the course topic and subject matter with their personal goals and through the establishment of an attractive value proposition. Progress in the MOOC depends on whether this goal alignment is maintained, and whether the value assumptions of students are met or exceeded. We predict that subsequent university enrolment will most likely occur when the MOOC experience is both satisfying and representative of the university experience, and where the increased time and financial commitment demanded by formal study is offset by the greater likelihood of attaining the focal goal. For this strategy to succeed, it will be necessary for the host institution to actively work with MOOC students to create an awareness of appropriate fee-paying courses and to promote the benefits of university study. This has implications for the way institutions market their courses to MOOC students.

[1]  S. Czellár,et al.  Consumer Well-Being: Effects of Subgoal Failures and Goal Importance , 2014 .

[2]  Raquel Sánchez-Fernández,et al.  The concept of perceived value: a systematic review of the research , 2007 .

[3]  R. Waller,et al.  The MOOC phenomenon: toward lifelong education for all? , 2014 .

[4]  Owen R. Youngman To Measure a MOOC's Value, Just Ask Students: The Chronicle of Higher Education , 2013 .

[5]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing , 2004 .

[6]  Patrick C. Shih,et al.  Understanding Student Motivation, Behaviors and Perceptions in MOOCs , 2015, CSCW.

[7]  Doug Clow,et al.  MOOCs and the funnel of participation , 2013, LAK '13.

[8]  J. Daniel,et al.  Making Sense of MOOCs : Musings in a Maze of Myth , Paradox and Possibility Author : , 2013 .

[9]  R. Pieters,et al.  A means-end chain approach to consumer goal structures , 1995 .

[10]  Yong Tan,et al.  Effects of Different Types of Free Trials and Ratings in Sampling of Consumer Software: An Empirical Study , 2013, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Norma S. Guerra,et al.  A Closer Look at College Students: Self-Efficacy and Goal Orientation , 2007 .

[12]  Brian D. Voss Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs): A Primer for University and College Board Members. An AGB White Paper. , 2013 .

[13]  Corlane Barclay,et al.  Towards an Understanding of the Implementation & Adoption of Massive Online Open Courses (MOOCs) in a Developing Economy Context , 2013 .

[14]  Katy Jordan,et al.  Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses , 2014 .

[15]  Esther Thorson,et al.  The Concept, Process, and Evolution of Integrated Marketing Communication , 2013 .

[16]  Mary Jo Bitner,et al.  Choosing among Alternative Service Delivery Modes: An Investigation of Customer Trial of Self-Service Technologies , 2005 .

[17]  Maria N. Gravani,et al.  Adult learning in a distance education context: theoretical and methodological challenges , 2015 .

[18]  Doris Lee,et al.  Assessing adult learning preferences using the analytic hierarchy process , 2000 .

[19]  Roy Williams,et al.  The ideals and reality of participating in a MOOC , 2010 .

[20]  A. Khalifa Customer value: a review of recent literature and an integrative configuration , 2004 .

[21]  Cathy Sandeen Integrating MOOCS into Traditional Higher Education: The Emerging “MOOC 3.0” Era , 2013 .

[22]  George Siemens Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age , 2004 .

[23]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[24]  G. Soutar,et al.  Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale , 2001 .

[25]  Gayle S. Christensen,et al.  The MOOC Phenomenon: Who Takes Massive Open Online Courses and Why? , 2013 .

[26]  Chrysanthos Dellarocas,et al.  Money models for MOOCs , 2013, CACM.

[27]  V. Zeithaml Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence: , 1988 .

[28]  Paul Stacey,et al.  Pedagogy of MOOCs , 2014 .

[29]  Claire Brown,et al.  University course selection and services marketing , 2009 .

[30]  Beng Soo Ong,et al.  MOOCs and Universities: Competitors or Partners? , 2015 .