Useful approaches to exploratory analysis of gaze data: enhanced heatmaps, cluster maps, and transition maps

Exploratory analysis of gaze data requires methods that make it possible to process large amounts of data while minimizing human labor. The conventional approach in exploring gaze data is to construct heatmap visualizations. While simple and intuitive, conventional heatmaps do not clearly indicate differences between groups of viewers or give estimates for the repeatability (i.e., which parts of the heatmap would look similar if the data were collected again). We discuss difference maps and significance maps that answer to these needs. In addition we describe methods based on automatic clustering that allow us to achieve similar results with cluster observation maps and transition maps. As demonstrated with our example data, these methods are effective in highlighting the strongest differences between groups more effectively than conventional heatmaps.

[1]  Junpeng Lao,et al.  iMap4: An open source toolbox for the statistical fixation mapping of eye movement data with linear mixed modeling , 2017, Behavior research methods.

[2]  C. Latimer,et al.  Eye-movement data: Cumulative fixation time and cluster analysis , 1988 .

[3]  Tamás D. Gedeon,et al.  Automatic clustering of eye gaze data for machine learning , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC).

[4]  D. C. Howell Statistical Methods for Psychology , 1987 .

[5]  Michael Burch,et al.  Visualization of Eye Tracking Data: A Taxonomy and Survey , 2017, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[6]  M. Braga,et al.  Exploratory Data Analysis , 2018, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining. 2nd Ed..

[7]  R. Lencer,et al.  Advanced analysis of free visual exploration patterns in schizophrenia , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[8]  Pat Dugard Randomization tests: A new gold standard? , 2014 .

[9]  Rico Fischer,et al.  Eye tracking and its application in usability and media research , 2003, MMI Interakt..

[10]  David S Wooding,et al.  Eye movements of large populations: II. Deriving regions of interest, coverage, and similarity using fixation maps , 2002, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[11]  H. Ritter,et al.  Disambiguating Complex Visual Information: Towards Communication of Personal Views of a Scene , 1996, Perception.

[12]  Agnieszka Bojko,et al.  Informative or Misleading? Heatmaps Deconstructed , 2009, HCI.

[13]  Oleg pakov,et al.  iComponent ­ Device-Independent Platform for Analyzing Eye Movement Data and Developing Eye-Based Applications , 2008 .

[14]  Michael B. Miller,et al.  The principled control of false positives in neuroimaging. , 2009, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[15]  Michael Burch,et al.  Visual Analytics Methodology for Eye Movement Studies , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[16]  Antoine Coutrot,et al.  Scanpath modeling and classification with hidden Markov models , 2017, Behavior Research Methods.

[17]  J. MacQueen Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations , 1967 .

[18]  Eugene S. Edgington,et al.  Randomization Tests , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[19]  Pilar Orero,et al.  Aggregate gaze visualization with real-time heatmaps , 2012, ETRA.

[20]  Claudio M. Privitera,et al.  Algorithms for Defining Visual Regions-of-Interest: Comparison with Eye Fixations , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[21]  Alan Kennedy,et al.  Book Review: Eye Tracking: A Comprehensive Guide to Methods and Measures , 2016, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.