A local optimization framework for addressing conservation conflicts in mosaic ecosystems

An effective strategy to resolve conservation conflicts on lands outside of nature reserves is to consider the spatial arrangement of agricultural and native vegetation parcels such that the ecological value of the landscape is improved without reducing the amount of land used for agricultural production. Global optimization methods have been used to identify the best spatial arrangement of land parcels for a given project goal, but these methods are not designed to provide pathways to reach the optimum from the initial landscape. Here we describe how local search algorithms can be used to develop land parcel rearrangement pathways to obtain a landscape that sustains greater species richness than the initial landscape without changing the amount of land used for agricultural production. To demonstrate how the local optimization framework can be applied, an ecological setting based on a forest-grassland mosaic ecosystem in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil was constructed. Plant samples collected from this region were used to construct species area curves. Multiple locally optimal solutions that improved the modeled species richness of the landscape almost to globally optimal levels were identified. To support the results, the algorithm was also applied to a 306,250 ha forest-grassland region of Rio Grande do Sul. The case study results suggested that conservation polices solely based on landowners satisfying a legal reserve percentage on their property should be revised to consider landscape-level connectivity. Providing multiple possible solutions for landscape configurations using local optimization methods may improve managerial flexibility for decision-makers, compared to global optimization approaches providing a single solution. Furthermore, the algorithm details the parcel exchange pathways that are required to reach the optimal land state. We conclude that local and global optimization approaches can be used in combination to improve land use decision-making for conservation, in mosaic ecosystems as well as other terrestrial ecosystems.

[1]  S. Andelman,et al.  Mathematical Methods for Identifying Representative Reserve Networks , 2000 .

[2]  M. Anand,et al.  Diversity Relationships among Taxonomic Groups in Recovering and Restored Forests , 2005 .

[3]  C. Bauch,et al.  Alternative stable states and the sustainability of forests, grasslands, and agriculture , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  H. Possingham,et al.  Applying a Decision‐Theory Framework to Landscape Planning for Biodiversity: Follow‐Up to Watson et al. , 2003 .

[5]  Carl Tim Kelley,et al.  Iterative methods for optimization , 1999, Frontiers in applied mathematics.

[6]  Karolin Baecker,et al.  Cellular Automata Modeling Of Physical Systems , 2016 .

[7]  A. Angelsen,et al.  Livelihoods, forests, and conservation in developing countries: an overview , 2005 .

[8]  S. Müller,et al.  Forest expansion or fragmentation? Discriminating forest fragments from natural forest patches through patch structure and spatial context metrics , 2015 .

[9]  Jean Paul Metzger,et al.  Land-use and land-cover change in Atlantic Forest landscapes , 2012 .

[10]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Reserve Selection Using Nonlinear Species Distribution Models , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[11]  J. Kool,et al.  Population connectivity: recent advances and new perspectives , 2012, Landscape Ecology.

[12]  V. Pillar,et al.  Role of nurse plants in Araucaria Forest expansion over grassland in south Brazil , 2006 .

[13]  C. Bauch,et al.  Outlook on a Worldwide Forest Transition , 2013, PloS one.

[14]  S. Scheiner.  Six types of species‐area curves , 2003 .

[15]  Xinyue Ye,et al.  Coarse-grained parallel genetic algorithm applied to a vector based land use allocation optimization problem: the case study of Tongzhou Newtown, Beijing, China , 2013, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment.

[16]  Paul H. Williams,et al.  Biodiversity conservation planning tools , 2006 .

[17]  Franz Makeschin,et al.  How to better consider sectoral planning information in regional planning: example afforestation and forest conversion , 2012 .

[18]  H. Possingham,et al.  Spatial conservation prioritization: Quantitative methods and computational tools , 2009 .

[19]  James Blake.  Overcoming the ‘value‐action gap’ in environmental policy: Tensions between national policy and local experience , 1999 .

[20]  K. Kumm.  Does re-creation of extensive pasture-forest mosaics provide an economically sustainable way of nature conservation in Sweden's forest dominated regions? , 2004 .

[21]  Valério D. Pillar,et al.  Brazil's neglected biome: The South Brazilian Campos , 2007 .

[22]  Y. Natuhara,et al.  Pattern of land mosaics affecting butterfly assemblage at Mt Ikoma, Osaka, Japan , 1999, Ecological Research.

[23]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  Effectiveness of Biodiversity Surrogates for Conservation Planning: Different Measures of Effectiveness Generate a Kaleidoscope of Variation , 2010, PloS one.

[24]  H. Behling,et al.  Late Quaternary vegetation, biodiversity and fire dynamics on the southern Brazilian highland and their implication for conservation and management of modern Araucaria forest and grassland ecosystems , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  E. Lambin,et al.  Land use transitions: Socio-ecological feedback versus socio-economic change , 2010 .

[26]  R. Hobbs,et al.  Biological Consequences of Ecosystem Fragmentation: A Review , 1991 .

[27]  Gretchen C. Daily,et al.  Biodiversity's genetic library. , 1997 .

[28]  Bastien Chopard,et al.  Cellular Automata Modeling of Physical Systems: Index , 1998 .

[29]  Ana S. L. Rodrigues,et al.  Shortcuts for Biodiversity Conservation Planning: The Effectiveness of Surrogates , 2007 .

[30]  Claire A. Montgomery,et al.  Where to put things? Spatial land management to sustain biodiversity and economic returns , 2008 .

[31]  R. Mittermeier,et al.  Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities , 2000, Nature.

[32]  B. Fisher,et al.  Poverty and biodiversity: Measuring the overlap of human poverty and the biodiversity hotspots , 2007 .

[33]  Susan Craw,et al.  Implementation of a spatial decision support system for rural land use planning: integrating geographic information system and environmental models with search and optimisation algorithms , 1999 .

[34]  B. Soares-Filho,et al.  Cracking Brazil's Forest Code , 2014, Science.

[35]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Chapter 17 Mathematical Methods for Identifying Representative Reserve Networks , 2000 .

[36]  H. Wehrden,et al.  Multiscale performance of landscape metrics as indicators of species richness of plants, insects and vertebrates , 2013 .

[37]  S. Sarkar,et al.  Systematic conservation planning , 2000, Nature.

[38]  Jared M. Diamond,et al.  THE ISLAND DILEMMA: LESSONS OF MODERN BIOGEOGRAPHIC STUDIES FOR THE DESIGN OF NATURAL RESERVES , 1975 .

[39]  G. Overbeck,et al.  Floristic composition, environmental variation and species distribution patterns in burned grassland in southern Brazil. , 2006, Brazilian journal of biology = Revista brasleira de biologia.

[40]  M. Liebig,et al.  Crop Species Diversity Changes in the United States: 1978–2012 , 2015, PloS one.

[41]  L. Firbank,et al.  Identifying and managing the conflicts between agriculture and biodiversity conservation in Europe - a review , 2008 .

[42]  Jon Hutton,et al.  People, Parks and Poverty: Political Ecology and Biodiversity Conservation , 2007 .

[43]  Jean Paul Metzger,et al.  The Brazilian Atlantic Forest: How much is left, and how is the remaining forest distributed? Implications for conservation , 2009 .

[44]  R. DeFries,et al.  Land‐use choices: balancing human needs and ecosystem function , 2004 .

[45]  C. Bauch,et al.  Landowner perceptions of the value of natural forest and natural grassland in a mosaic ecosystem in southern Brazil , 2015, Sustainability Science.

[46]  M. Luoto,et al.  Effects of landscape composition on farmland and red-listed birds in boreal agricultural-forest mosaics , 2004 .

[47]  Paul W. Fieguth,et al.  Forest structure optimization using evolutionary programming and landscape ecology metrics , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[48]  Dazhong Wen.  Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions , 1997 .

[49]  M. Anand,et al.  Mechanisms of Araucaria (Atlantic) Forest Expansion into Southern Brazilian Grasslands , 2011, Ecosystems.

[50]  Robert Costanza,et al.  The Local Politics of Global Sustainability , 1999 .

[51]  D. P. Faith,et al.  Integrating conservation and development: effective trade-offs between biodiversity and cost in the selection of protected areas , 1996, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[52]  G. Londo.  The decimal scale for releves of permanent quadrats , 1976, Vegetatio.

[53]  Ivette Perfecto,et al.  The agroecological matrix as alternative to the land-sparing/agriculture intensification model , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[54]  L. Fahrig.  Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on Biodiversity , 2003 .