Urban development projects catalyst for sustainable transformations: the need for entrepreneurial political leadership

This article argues that lessons for sustainable urban transformations can be learned from a more precise understanding of urban political leadership in decision-making processes of far-reaching urban development projects. While urban governance networks and distributed forms of governing may be typical of contemporary urban political configurations, our results show the necessity of entrepreneurial political leadership in developing an agenda for sustainable urban transformations, in connecting policy streams and engaging stakeholders, and in aligning and deliberating between different interests. To map the role, impact and strategic behaviour of the dominant actors, especially the mayor, we reconstructed thoroughly the decision-making processes of three urban projects in the city of Kortrijk (Belgium). For this multiple case study we used a complexity-acknowledging perspective and opted for qualitative research techniques.

[1]  T. Block,et al.  When Strategic Plans Fail to Lead. A Complexity Acknowledging Perspective on Decision-Making in Urban Development Projects—The Case of Kortrijk (Belgium) , 2012 .

[2]  David Marsh,et al.  Comparing policy networks , 1998 .

[3]  G. Macleod,et al.  Space, scale and state strategy: rethinking urban and regional governance , 1999 .

[4]  Flor Avelino,et al.  Power in Transition: Empowering Discourses on Sustainability Transitions , 2006 .

[5]  Paul DiMaggio.  Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory , 1988 .

[6]  J. Grin,et al.  Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change , 2010 .

[7]  Vivien Lowndes,et al.  Understanding Local Political Leadership: Constitutions, Contexts and Capabilities , 2004 .

[8]  P. John,et al.  The Transformation of Urban Political Leadership in Western Europe , 2004 .

[9]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[10]  N. Rao,et al.  Transforming local political leadership , 2005 .

[11]  Petra Wächter.  Transitions to sustainable development – new directions in the study of long term transformative change , 2012 .

[12]  Maarten A. Hajer,et al.  The Politics of Environmental Discourse , 1997 .

[13]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[14]  The Institutional Approach , 2010 .

[15]  J. Whitney.  Case Study Research , 1999 .

[16]  Linda S. Lotto.  Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods , 1986 .

[17]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Towards a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions , 2012 .

[18]  P. John.  Local governance in Western Europe , 2001 .

[19]  Maarten A. Hajer,et al.  Deliberative Policy Analysis: Contents , 2003 .

[20]  John W. Kingdon.  Agendas, alternatives, and public policies , 1984 .

[21]  Mike Hodson,et al.  Cities and Low Carbon Transitions , 2010 .

[22]  G. Stoker,et al.  Mayors and Urban Governance: Developing a Facilitative Leadership Style , 2008 .

[23]  Raghu Garud,et al.  Institutional Entrepreneurship as Embedded Agency: An Introduction to the Special Issue , 2007 .

[24]  D. Loorbach.  Transition Management: New Mode of Governance for Sustainable Development , 2007 .

[25]  B. Latour.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[26]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[27]  B. Jones,et al.  Agendas and instability in American politics , 1993 .

[28]  Adrian Smith,et al.  The (non-)politics of managing low carbon socio-technical transitions , 2009 .

[29]  H. Wagenaar,et al.  Understanding governance in the network society , 2003 .

[30]  J. Meadowcroft.  Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions , 2011 .

[31]  F. Geels,et al.  Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways , 2007 .

[32]  Erik-Hans Klijn,et al.  Analyzing and Managing Policy Processes in Complex Networks , 1996 .

[33]  Willem Salet,et al.  Framing Strategic Urban Projects : Learning from current experiences in European urban regions , 2006 .

[34]  W. Creed,et al.  Institutional Contradictions, Praxis, and Institutional Change: A Dialectical Perspective , 2002 .

[35]  E. Swyngedouw,et al.  Neoliberal Urbanization in Europe: Large–Scale Urban Development Projects and the New Urban Policy , 2002 .

[36]  J. Pierre.  Partnerships in Urban Governance , 1998 .

[37]  R. D. Jessop,et al.  A neo-gramscian approach to the regulation of urban regimes. , 1997 .

[38]  M. Hodson,et al.  Can cities shape socio-technical transitions and how would we know if they were? , 2010 .

[39]  Erik-Hans Klijn,et al.  Governance and Governance Networks in Europe , 2008 .

[40]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Designing long-term policy: rethinking transition management , 2009 .

[41]  L. Schaap,et al.  From Princeps to President? Comparing Local Political Leadership Transformation , 2008 .

[42]  M. Mintrom,et al.  Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of innovation , 1997 .

[43]  C. Hardy,et al.  Institutional Entrepreneurship in Emerging Fields: HIV/AIDS Treatment Advocacy in Canada , 2004 .

[44]  G. Teisman.  MODELS FOR RESEARCH INTO DECISION-MAKING PROCESSES : ON PHASES , STREAMS AND DECISION-MAKING , 2000 .

[45]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. , 1972 .

[46]  Robert A. Dahl,et al.  Who Governs: Democracy and Power in an American City. , 1961 .

[47]  Jon Pierre,et al.  Partnerships in urban governance : European and American experience , 1998 .

[48]  E. Klijn,et al.  Managing Uncertainties in Networks a Network Approach to Problem Solving and Decision Making , 2004 .

[49]  Erik-Hans Klijn,et al.  Complexity Theory and Public Management , 2008 .

[50]  E. Sørensen,et al.  Network Politics, Political Capital, and Democracy , 2003 .

[51]  A. Giddens.  The Constitution of Society , 1985 .