Sensitivity of rapid antigen tests for Omicron subvariants of SARS‐CoV‐2

Diagnosis by rapid antigen tests (RATs) is useful for early initiation of antiviral treatment. Because RATs are easy to use, they can be adapted for self‐testing. Several kinds of RATs approved for such use by the Japanese regulatory authority are available from drug stores and websites. Most RATs for COVID‐19 are based on antibody detection of the SARS‐CoV‐2 N protein. Since Omicron and its subvariants have accumulated several amino acid substitutions in the N protein, such amino acid changes might affect the sensitivity of RATs. Here, we investigated the sensitivity of seven RATs available in Japan, six of which are approved for public use and one of which is approved for clinical use, for the detection of BA.5, BA.2.75, BF.7, XBB.1, and BQ.1.1, as well as the delta variant (B.1.627.2). All tested RATs detected the delta variant with a detection level between 7500 and 75 000 pfu per test, and all tested RATs showed similar sensitivity to the Omicron variant and its subvariants (BA.5, BA.2.75, BF.7, XBB.1, and BQ.1.1). Human saliva did not reduce the sensitivity of the RATs tested. Espline SARS‐CoV‐2 N showed the highest sensitivity followed by Inspecter KOWA SARS‐CoV‐2 and V Trust SARS‐CoV‐2 Ag. Since the RATs failed to detect low levels of infectious virus, individuals whose specimens contained less infectious virus than the detection limit would be considered negative. Therefore, it is important to note that RATs may miss individuals shedding low levels of infectious virus.

[1]  S. Gatrell,et al.  Performance Evaluation of Five Rapid At-Home COVID-19 Antigen Tests against the Omicron Variant , 2022, Microbiology spectrum.

[2]  L. Kaderali,et al.  Variable detection of Omicron-BA.1 and -BA.2 by SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests , 2022, Medical Microbiology and Immmunology.

[3]  Q. Ng,et al.  The Performance of Lateral Flow Tests in the Age of the Omicron: A Rapid Systematic Review , 2022, Life.

[4]  J. Derisi,et al.  COVID-19 Symptoms and Duration of Rapid Antigen Test Positivity at a Community Testing and Surveillance Site During Pre-Delta, Delta, and Omicron BA.1 Periods , 2022, JAMA network open.

[5]  V. Calvez,et al.  Decreased Sensitivity of Rapid Antigen Test Is Associated with a Lower Viral Load of Omicron than Delta SARS-CoV-2 Variant , 2022, Microbiology spectrum.

[6]  E. Lam,et al.  Analytical sensitivity of the Rapid Antigen Test kits for detection of SARS‐CoV‐2 Omicron variant BA.2 sublineage , 2022, Journal of medical virology.

[7]  J. Dogné,et al.  Analytical Sensitivity of Six SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Tests for Omicron versus Delta Variant , 2022, Viruses.

[8]  L. Kaderali,et al.  Impaired detection of omicron by SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests , 2022, Medical Microbiology and Immunology.

[9]  M. Hellmich,et al.  Determining the reliability of rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection in fully vaccinated individuals , 2022, Journal of Clinical Virology.

[10]  Y. Kawaoka,et al.  Comparative Sensitivity of Rapid Antigen Tests for the Delta Variant (B.1.617.2) of SARS-CoV-2 , 2021, Viruses.

[11]  A. Baiker,et al.  Comparison of four commercial, automated antigen tests to detect SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern , 2021, Medical Microbiology and Immunology.

[12]  R. Shrestha,et al.  Evaluation of Analytical Performance of Seven Rapid Antigen Detection Kits for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Virus , 2021, International journal of general medicine.

[13]  K. Asanuma,et al.  Evaluating a novel, highly sensitive, and quantitative reagent for detecting SARS-CoV-2 antigen , 2021, Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy.

[14]  Gannon C.K. Mak,et al.  Evaluation of rapid antigen detection kit from the WHO Emergency Use List for detecting SARS-CoV-2 , 2020, Journal of Clinical Virology.

[15]  Y. Kawaoka,et al.  Comparison of Rapid Antigen Tests for COVID-19 , 2020, Viruses.

[16]  M. Hornef,et al.  Comparison of the SARS-CoV-2 Rapid antigen test to the real star Sars-CoV-2 RT PCR kit , 2020, Journal of Virological Methods.

[17]  Tsuyoshi Sekizuka,et al.  Disentangling primer interactions improves SARS-CoV-2 genome sequencing by multiplex tiling PCR , 2020, PloS one.

[18]  S. Mimura,et al.  Clinical Evaluation of Self-Collected Saliva by Quantitative Reverse Transcription-PCR (RT-qPCR), Direct RT-qPCR, Reverse Transcription–Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification, and a Rapid Antigen Test To Diagnose COVID-19 , 2020, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[19]  Gannon C.K. Mak,et al.  Evaluation of rapid antigen test for detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus , 2020, Journal of Clinical Virology.

[20]  M. Tré-Hardy,et al.  Implementation of rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigenic testing in a laboratory without access to molecular methods: Experiences of a general hospital , 2020, Journal of Clinical Virology.

[21]  Hector Rodriguez-Villalobos,et al.  Low performance of rapid antigen detection test as frontline testing for COVID-19 diagnosis , 2020, Journal of Clinical Virology.

[22]  C. Delaugerre,et al.  Evaluation of a Rapid Diagnostic Assay for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antigen in Nasopharyngeal Swabs , 2020, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[23]  Akihide Ryo,et al.  Interpreting Diagnostic Tests for SARS-CoV-2. , 2020, JAMA.

[24]  M. Van Ranst,et al.  Development and Potential Usefulness of the COVID-19 Ag Respi-Strip Diagnostic Assay in a Pandemic Context , 2020, Frontiers in Medicine.

[25]  S. Dittrich,et al.  Evaluation of a novel antigen-based rapid detection test for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 in respiratory samples , 2020, International Journal of Infectious Diseases.