Human redundancy in complex, hazardous systems: A theoretical framework

A theoretical framework is presented to provide a basis for sociotechnical system design strategies to promote effective human redundancy in complex, hazardous systems and to support qualitative human reliability assessment. A concept of human redundancy is proposed, including a description of human redundancy forms. Human redundancy forms constitute the various ways in which human redundancy can be implemented in a sociotechnical system and incorporate human redundancy structures, active and standby human redundancy, duplication and overlap of functions, and cognitive diversity. Multi-modal redundancy structures in systems with human, hardware and software sub-systems are described. The foregoing concept of human redundancy is integrated with an adapted error recovery process. The resulting framework accounts for human redundancy forms, the influence of the nature of the error to be recovered, underlying error recovery processes (initiation of human redundancy followed by detection, indication, explanation and correction of the error), the local and organisational factors influencing the effectiveness of human redundancy, and cognitive diversity. On the basis of this framework, failures of human redundancy are analysed, sociotechnical system design strategies for the promotion of effective human redundancy are discussed, and future research needs are outlined.

[1]  Laurence Rognin,et al.  Impact of Communication on Systems Dependability: Human Factors Perspectives , 1999, SAFECOMP.

[2]  Nancy G. Leveson,et al.  Safeware: System Safety and Computers , 1995 .

[3]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[4]  Tom Kontogiannis,et al.  User strategies in recovering from errors in man–machine systems , 1999 .

[5]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Team Work and Group Dynamics , 1998 .

[6]  Paul D. Hollywell.  Incorporating human dependent failures in risk assessments to improve estimates of actual risk , 1996 .

[7]  James T. Reason,et al.  Managing the risks of organizational accidents , 1997 .

[8]  V. P. Brand,et al.  Dependent failures: when it all goes wrong at once' , 1993 .

[9]  Kunihide Sasou,et al.  Team errors: definition and taxonomy , 1999 .

[10]  Michael A. Campion,et al.  JOB AND TEAM DESIGN , 2006, Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics.

[11]  Peter F. Elzer,et al.  Human error and system design and management , 2000 .

[12]  T. Laporte,et al.  Working in Practice But Not in Theory: Theoretical Challenges of “High-Reliability Organizations” , 1991 .

[13]  K. Weick.  Organizational Culture as a Source of High Reliability , 1987 .

[14]  Alastair Ross,et al.  Safety Management: A Qualitative Systems Approach , 2003 .

[15]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics , 2005 .

[16]  Johan F. Hoorn,et al.  Distributed cognition , 2005, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[17]  L Lisette Kanse,et al.  Errors and error recovery , 2000 .

[18]  G. R. J. Hockey,et al.  Engineering Cognitive Diversity , 1997 .

[19]  D. L. Simms,et al.  Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies , 1986 .

[20]  R. D. Leitch,et al.  BASIC reliability engineering analysis , 1988 .

[21]  Edwin Hutchins,et al.  Distributed Cognition in an Airline Cockpit , 1996 .

[22]  Barry Kirwan,et al.  A Guide to Practical Human Reliability Assessment , 1994 .

[23]  Tom Kontogiannis,et al.  A framework for the analysis of cognitive reliability in complex systems: a recovery centred approach , 1997 .

[24]  I. Janis.  Victims Of Groupthink , 1972 .

[25]  Dieter Zapf,et al.  Introduction: Human Errors and Error Handling , 1994 .

[26]  E. Salas,et al.  Team cognition : understanding the factors that drive process and performance , 2004 .

[27]  L Lisette Kanse,et al.  Recovery From Failures in the Chemical Process Industry , 2001 .

[28]  Felix Redmill,et al.  Human Factors in Safety-Critical Systems , 1997 .

[29]  B. Turner.  Man Made Disasters , 1995 .

[30]  Paul E. Jones,et al.  The potential for social contextual and group biases in team decision-making: biases, conditions and psychological mechanisms , 2000, Ergonomics.

[31]  Y. Rogers.  A brief introduction to Distributed Cognition , 1997 .

[32]  L. Beltracchi,et al.  A strategy for minimizing common mode human error in executing critical functions and tasks , 1992 .

[33]  G. Robert J. Hockey,et al.  Cognitive Diversity: A Structured Approach to Trapping Human Error , 1995, SAFECOMP.