Digestion of Barley, Maize, and Wheat by Selected Species of Ruminal Bacteria

Differences in the digestion of barley, maize, and wheat by three major ruminal starch-digesting bacterial species, Streptococcus bovis 26, Ruminobacter amylophilus 50, and Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens A38, were characterized. The rate of starch digestion in all cereal species was greater for S. bovis 26 than for R. amylophilus 50 or B. fibrisolvens A38. Starch digestion by S. bovis 26 was greater in wheat than in barley or maize, whereas starch digestion by R. amylophilus 50 was greater in barley than in maize or wheat. B. fibrisolvens A38 digested the starch in barley and maize to a similar extent but was virtually unable to digest the starch in wheat. The higher ammonia concentration in cultures of B. fibrisolvens A38 when grown on wheat than when grown on barley or maize suggests that B. fibrisolvens A38 utilized wheat protein rather than starch. Scanning electron microscopy revealed that B. fibrisolvens A38 initially colonized cell wall material, while S. bovis 26 randomly colonized the endosperm and R. amylophilus 50 preferentially colonized starch granules. There was subsequent colonization but only superficial digestion of wheat starch granules by B. fibrisolvens A38. Variation in the association between starch and protein within the endosperm of cereal grains contributes to the differential effectiveness with which amylolytic species can utilize cereal starch.

[1]  J. Buchanan-Smith,et al.  USE OF FORMALDEHYDE TO REGULATE DIGESTION OF BARLEY STARCH , 1990 .

[2]  M. Cotta Amylolytic activity of selected species of ruminal bacteria , 1988, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[3]  G. Broderick,et al.  Protein degradation by ruminal microorganisms from sheep fed dietary supplements of urea, casein, or albumin , 1987, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[4]  L. Rooney,et al.  Factors affecting starch digestibility with special emphasis on sorghum and corn. , 1986, Journal of animal science.

[5]  E. Stackebrandt,et al.  Transfer of Bacteroides amylophilus to a new genus Ruminobacter gen. nov., nom. rev. as Ruminobacter amylophilus comb. nov. , 1986 .

[6]  M. Cotta,et al.  Proteolytic activity of the ruminal bacterium Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens , 1986, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[7]  R. B. Hespell,et al.  Protein and amino acid metabolism of rumen bacteria , 1986 .

[8]  P. H. Robinson,et al.  Compositions and characteristics of strains of Streptococcus bovis. , 1984, Journal of dairy science.

[9]  S. Hrudey,et al.  A simple apparatus for measuring gas production by methanogenic cultures in serum bottles , 1983 .

[10]  J. Costerton,et al.  Atlas of Rumen Microbiology , 1983 .

[11]  A. Kistner,et al.  Effect of pH on growth rates of rumen amylolytic and lactilytic bacteria , 1982, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[12]  M. Cotta,et al.  Degradation of protein by mixed cultures of rumen bacteria: identification of Streptococcus bovis as an actively proteolytic rumen bacterium. , 1981, Journal of animal science.

[13]  J. Russell,et al.  Effect of pH on the efficiency of growth by pure cultures of rumen bacteria in continuous culture , 1980, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[14]  T. Suto,et al.  TECHNIQUE FOR FRACTIONATION OF BACTERIA IN RUMEN MICROBIAL ECOSYSTEM. III. ATTACHMENT OF BACTERIA ISOLATED FROM BOVINE RUMEN TO STARCH GRANULES IN VITRO AND ELUTION OF BACTERIA ATTACHED THEREFROM , 1979 .

[15]  D. V. Glover,et al.  Susceptibility of Various Starch Granules to Amylases as Seen by Scanning Electron Microscope , 1978 .

[16]  P. Hartman,et al.  Purification and some properties of an extracellular alpha-amylase from Bacteroides amylophilus , 1977, Journal of bacteriology.

[17]  L. L. Slyter Influence of acidosis on rumen function. , 1976, Journal of animal science.

[18]  N. Russell,et al.  Degradation of amino acids by pure cultures of rumen bacteria. , 1976, Journal of animal science.

[19]  T. Suto,et al.  Technique for fractionation of bacteria in rumen microbial ecosystem. I. Attachment of rumen bacteria to starch granules and elution of bacteria attached to them.:I. ATTACHMENT OF RUMEN BACTERIA TO STARCH GRANULES AND ELUTION OF BACTERIA ATTACHED TO THEM , 1976 .

[20]  D. Armstrong,et al.  Enzyme method for determination of α-linked glucose polymers in biological materials , 1968 .

[21]  R. Summers,et al.  The nitrogen sources of Bacteroides amylophilus. , 1968, Journal of general microbiology.

[22]  M. W. Weatherburn Phenol-hypochlorite reaction for determination of ammonia , 1967 .

[23]  G. J. Walker,et al.  Degradation of starch granules by some amylolytic bacteria from the rumen of sheep. , 1964, The Biochemical journal.

[24]  M. P. Bryant,et al.  A Study of Bacterial Species from the Rumen Which Produce Ammonia from Protein Hydrolyzate. , 1961, Applied microbiology.

[25]  M. P. Bryant,et al.  Cultural Methods and Some Characteristics of Some of the More Numerous Groups of Bacteria in the Bovine Rumen , 1953 .