Student Perceptions of Tactile and Virtual Learning Approaches: What Can We Learn from their Viewpoint?

Active physical manipulation and touching of objects, also known as tactile interactions, are generally viewed as effective ways for students to learn complex and abstract concepts. Researchers, however, are still investigating how tactile instructional activities contribute to deeper student learning. In traditional engineering design courses, students engage in tactile as well as virtual learning experiences. This study aims to determine whether substantial differences exist between tactile and virtual learning approaches on active learning outcomes. In this preliminary study, we are investigating students’ perceptions of tactile and virtual learning activities in an engineering design classroom and the challenges that students face in performing these types of activities in a team-based approach. Active learning can have many definitions and, in general, refers to various teaching and learning strategies where students are responsible for their learning by interactive involvement – this is not a passive lecture approach. With tactile learning, students are able to explore and manipulate objects and materials, yet today’s students tend to do much of their exploration and object manipulation through the use of computer technologies rather than through interactions with physical products (e.g., virtual product dissection versus physical dissection). Some wonder if students who no longer touch and handle objects are able to be effective abstract thinkers. Others contend that because today’s students are more tech savvy, active learning is possible through virtual interactions. Our freshman students are introduced to engineering design in a course that incorporates both digital and hands-on learning. This class provides students with theoretical fundamentals, abstract thinking, and real-world applications that are taught through the framework of sustainable design and environmental awareness. Students work in teams to complete their lab assignments and their ability to successfully collaborate, use the various technologies, and create novel solutions is dependent upon their ability to manipulate objects (either physically or virtually). In this paper, we offer preliminary evidence on the comparison of tactile to virtual learning as perceived by our students and share instructional issues that students feel either help or hinder their ability to learn.

[1]  N. Howe,et al.  Millennials Rising: The Next Great Generation , 2000 .

[2]  Susan McLaren,et al.  Exploring perceptions and attitudes towards teaching and learning manual technical drawing in a digital age , 2008 .

[3]  David B. Oglesby,et al.  Computer-Based Instructional Media for Mechanics of Materials , 2003 .

[4]  Sheryl A. Sorby,et al.  International Experiences in Developing the Spatial Visualization Abilities of Engineering Students , 2001 .

[5]  Jeffrey V. Nickerson,et al.  Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories: A comparative literature review , 2006, CSUR.

[6]  Shuyan Wang,et al.  Haptics-Augmented Undergraduate Engineering Education , 2004 .

[7]  Jacqueline Lewis,et al.  College students@tech.edu: A Study of Comfort and the Use of Technology. , 2001 .

[8]  Sara Druyan Effect of the kinesthetic conflict on promoting scientific reasoning , 1997 .

[9]  M. Green,et al.  Digital natives , 2012, BDJ.

[10]  Filip Dochy,et al.  Students’ likes and dislikes regarding student-activating and lecture-based educational settings: Consequences for students’ perceptions of the learning environment, student learning and performance , 2008 .

[11]  Noel Entwistle,et al.  Approaches to learning and perceptions of the learning environment , 1991 .

[12]  M. Prensky Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1 , 2001 .

[13]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  Reverse Engineering and Redesign: Courses to Incrementally and Systematically Teach Design , 2001 .

[14]  M. P. Friedman,et al.  HANDBOOK OF PERCEPTION , 1977 .

[15]  C. Bonwell,et al.  Active learning : creating excitement in the classroom , 1991 .

[16]  S. J. Lederman,et al.  Chapter 12 – TACTUAL PERCEPTION OF TEXTURE , 1973 .

[17]  Saskia Brand-Gruwel,et al.  Towards more powerful learning environments through combining the perspectives of designers, teachers, and students. , 2005, The British journal of educational psychology.

[18]  David M. Johnstone Millennials Rising: The Next Great Generation , 2001 .

[19]  Clara C. Pratt,et al.  Measuring Program Outcomes: Using Retrospective Pretest Methodology , 2000 .

[20]  Lynne Celli Sarasin Learning Style Perspectives: Impact in the Classroom , 1998 .

[21]  D. Scott Perceptual learning. , 1974, Queen's nursing journal.

[22]  M. Valenti Teaching tomorrow's engineers , 1996 .