Characterizing third-party logistics setups in the context of construction

The use of third-party logistics (TPL) setups in construction has increased but is still a new phenomenon. The purpose was to increase understanding of how structural and management dimensions are related in CLSs by describing how CTPL setups are used.,Ten dimensions to describe and structure CLSs were identified from the literature and used to structure a cross-case analysis of 13 Swedish CLSs.,The main findings are: (1) there are three typical initiators of CLSs: municipalities, developers and contractors; (2) CLSs are drivers for service differentiation and modularization among TPL providers as construction specific services are required; (3) CLSs play a new role in construction by coordinating logistics activities between the construction project and the vicinity of the site.,The study is based on 13 cases in the Swedish construction context. Additional studies of CLSs in other countries are needed.,The ten dimensions can be used as a guide in designing a CLS and in determining the order of design decisions. The identification and structuring of CTPL services also exemplify the variety of service offerings.,This is one of the first cross-case analyses of CLSs enabling the characterization of CTPL setups. This study identifies how different services included in the setup relate to the roles of SCM and logistics in construction.

[1]  Thomas Olofsson,et al.  Supply chains in the construction industry , 2010 .

[2]  Suhaiza Hanim Binti Dato Mohamad Zailani,et al.  Third party logistics orchestrator role in reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chains , 2014 .

[3]  Martin Rudberg,et al.  Third-party logistics in construction: the case of a large hospital project , 2016 .

[4]  Hans Voordijk.  The changing logistical system of the building materials supply chain , 2000 .

[5]  S. Hertz,et al.  Strategic development of third party logistics providers , 2003 .

[6]  J. Tookey,et al.  Measuring the invisible , 2018, Benchmarking: An International Journal.

[7]  Jeffrey S. Russell,et al.  A project manager's level of satisfaction in construction logistics , 2003 .

[8]  Albert Jones,et al.  A service oriented framework for construction supply chain integration , 2010, Automation in Construction.

[9]  F. Hamzeh,et al.  A New Perspective of Construction Logistics and Production Control: An Exploratory Study , 2018, 26th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction.

[10]  Lauri Koskela,et al.  The four roles of supply chain management in construction , 2000 .

[11]  Per-Erik Josephson,et al.  Waste in construction projects: call for a new approach , 2007 .

[12]  Susann Kluge.  Empirically Grounded Construction of Types and Typologies in Qualitative Social Research , 2000 .

[13]  T. Skjoett‐Larsen,et al.  Third party logistics – from an interorganizational point of view , 2000 .

[14]  G. Kovács,et al.  Examination of service triads in humanitarian logistics , 2019, The International Journal of Logistics Management.

[15]  Per-Erik Josephson,et al.  In‐housing or out‐sourcing on‐site materials handling in housing? , 2013 .

[16]  Laurence Saglietto.  Towards a classification of Fourth Party Logistics (4PL) , 2013 .

[17]  M. Martinsuo,et al.  Change program management: Toward a capability for managing value-oriented, integrated multi-project change in its context , 2018 .

[18]  Martin Spring,et al.  Third party logistics : a literature review and research agenda , 2007 .

[19]  Viktoria Sundquist,et al.  Reorganizing construction logistics for improved performance , 2018 .

[20]  Heiko Gebauer,et al.  Characterizing service networks for moving from products to solutions , 2013 .

[21]  P. V. Laarhoven,et al.  Third‐Party Logistics: Is There a Future? , 1999 .

[22]  Andreas Norrman,et al.  Performance-based contracting for advanced logistics services: Challenges in its adoption, design and management , 2015 .

[23]  A. Marasco.  Third-party logistics: A literature review , 2008 .

[24]  Lars-Erik Gadde,et al.  Systematic combining: an abductive approach to case research , 2002 .

[25]  Lars-Erik Gadde,et al.  The construction industry as a loosely coupled system: implications for productivity and innovation , 2002 .

[26]  Anna M K Fredriksson,et al.  Materials Supply and Production Outsourcing , 2011 .

[27]  Anna M K Fredriksson,et al.  Construction logistics governing guidelines in urban development projects , 2019, Construction Innovation.

[28]  A. Fredriksson,et al.  Assessing consequences of low‐cost sourcing in China , 2009 .

[29]  Christopher A. Voss,et al.  Service modularity and architecture – an overview and research agenda , 2017 .

[30]  Martin Rudberg,et al.  Effects of employing third-party logistics arrangements in construction projects , 2020, Production Planning & Control.

[31]  D. Lambert,et al.  Issues in Supply Chain Management , 2000 .

[32]  Albert Tan,et al.  Determinants of Fifth Party Logistics (5PL): service providers for Supply Chain Management , 2012 .

[33]  Max Finne,et al.  The governance of collaboration in complex projects , 2018 .

[34]  Á. Halldórsson,et al.  Third party logistics - a Nordic research approach , 2006 .

[35]  G. Stefansson.  Collaborative logistics management and the role of third‐party service providers , 2006 .

[36]  Roger Atkinson,et al.  Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria , 1999 .

[37]  H. Kotzab,et al.  Complementary theories to supply chain management revisited – from borrowing theories to theorizing , 2015 .

[38]  Christian Kowalkowski,et al.  Servitization and Deservitization: Overview, Concepts, and Definitions , 2016 .

[39]  A. Dubois,et al.  Organising logistics and transport activities in construction , 2019, The International Journal of Logistics Management.

[40]  Lars-Erik Gadde,et al.  Supply strategy and network effects — purchasing behaviour in the construction industry , 2000 .

[41]  M. Janné.  Construction Logistics Solutions in Urban Areas , 2018 .

[42]  D. Ketchen,et al.  “Goldilocks” Theorizing in Supply Chain Research: Balancing Scientific and Practical Utility via Middle-Range Theory , 2016 .