Breath testing could provide a totally new, comprehensive detection and screening method for digestive cancers, which can affect in the entire digestive system: esophagus, stomach, small intestine, colon, rectum, anus, liver, pancreas, gallbladder and biliary system. Digestive cancers belong to the most widespread and deadly human cancers. Colorectal cancer and stomach cancer, for example, are the second leading causes of cancer deaths in the USA and worldwide, respectively [1]. Early presymptomatic detection is paramount in the management of digestive cancers, improving prognosis and treatment outcome. In cases where screening methods are available, there is still space for improvement. Upper endoscopy or colonoscopy, combined with biopsy and histopathological evaluation of tissue samples are highly accurate diagnostic methods for esophagus, stomach and colorectal cancer, but are plagued with prominent setbacks: the relentless and invasive procedures are inconvenient to the patients and still carry some risk to their health, although a small one [2,3]. Moreover, they are too costly and time-consuming for population-based screening. Diagnostic breath testing would be extremely attractive, because it is totally noninvasive and painless to the individual, having no undesirable side effects [4–8]. Real-time breath testing by simply exhaling into an instrument would be especially useful, because the data could be immediately available to the clinician, allowing swift treatment decisions and reducing the number of visits to the clinic. Human breath is mainly composed of nitrogen, oxygen, carbon dioxide, water vapor and inert gases. In addition, thousands of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are exhaled at very low concentrations (estimated as parts per trillion or parts per billion by volume of the exhaled breath) [4,5]. Part of these substances are of endogenous origin and could be characteristic for metabolic processes in the human body (including cancer), while several hundreds others are exogenic, that is, passing through the human body [4]. The latter could be considered as pollution or background noise. Nonetheless, these VOCs might also be relevant as exogenous markers of digestive cancers since particular individuals (having the disease or with particular activated metabolic pathways) might have a different capacity to accumulate and concentrate particular VOCs in the body [4]. Endogenous cancer-specific VOCs are released from the cancer cells and/or metabolic processes that are associated with cancer growth whereby different cancers emit different types and/or amounts of molecules. These VOCs are transported with the blood to the alveoli of the lung from where they are exhaled as measurable odorants. Therefore, cancer does not only have a smell, but, at least in theory, different cancers have different smells [4]. The smell of cancer is far too delicate for direct human perception, but anecdotes of dogs perceiving cancer in their owners have been occasionally reported since Breath testing: the future for digestive cancer detection
[1]
Yoshihiro Kakeji,et al.
Colorectal cancer screening with odour material by canine scent detection
,
2011,
Gut.
[2]
HywelC. Williams,et al.
Another sniffer dog for the clinic?
,
2001,
The Lancet.
[3]
Ulrike Tisch,et al.
The scent fingerprint of hepatocarcinoma: in-vitro metastasis prediction with volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
,
2012,
International journal of nanomedicine.
[4]
C. Willis,et al.
Olfactory detection of human bladder cancer by dogs: proof of principle study
,
2004,
BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[5]
Ulrike Tisch,et al.
Nanomaterials for cross-reactive sensor arrays
,
2010
.
[6]
Radu Ionescu,et al.
Nanoarray of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and carbon nanotubes for accurate and predictive detection in real-world environmental humidity.
,
2011,
ACS nano.
[7]
David M Cutler,et al.
Are we finally winning the war on cancer?
,
2008,
The journal of economic perspectives : a journal of the American Economic Association.
[8]
L. Trizio,et al.
Exhaled volatile organic compounds identify patients with colorectal cancer
,
2013,
The British journal of surgery.
[9]
E. Kirkness,et al.
Comparison of the canine and human olfactory receptor gene repertoires
,
2003,
Genome Biology.
[10]
H. Haick,et al.
Diagnosing lung cancer in exhaled breath using gold nanoparticles.
,
2009,
Nature nanotechnology.
[11]
H. Haick,et al.
Effect of humidity on nanoparticle-based chemiresistors: a comparison between synthetic and real-world samples.
,
2012,
ACS applied materials & interfaces.
[12]
Ulrike Tisch,et al.
Arrays of chemisensitive monolayer-capped metallic nanoparticles for diagnostic breath testing
,
2010
.
[13]
David Smith,et al.
Breath analysis: the approach towards clinical applications.
,
2007,
Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry.
[14]
H. Haick,et al.
Detection of lung, breast, colorectal, and prostate cancers from exhaled breath using a single array of nanosensors
,
2010,
British Journal of Cancer.
[15]
Chiao‐Yun Chen,et al.
Differentiation between malignant and benign gastric ulcers: CT virtual gastroscopy versus optical gastroendoscopy.
,
2009,
Radiology.
[16]
Ulrike Tisch,et al.
Volatile Organic Compounds in Exhaled Breath as Biomarkers for the Early Detection and Screening of Lung Cancer
,
2012
.
[17]
HywelC. Williams,et al.
SNIFFER DOGS IN THE MELANOMA CLINIC?
,
1989,
The Lancet.
[18]
P. Colletti,et al.
Double-contrast barium meal and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. A comparative study.
,
1984,
Annals of internal medicine.
[19]
Hossam Haick,et al.
Volatile organic compounds of lung cancer and possible biochemical pathways.
,
2012,
Chemical reviews.
[20]
H. Haick,et al.
A nanomaterial-based breath test for distinguishing gastric cancer from benign gastric conditions
,
2013,
British Journal of Cancer.