Evaluation of two computational models of amplitude modulation coding in the inferior colliculus

Two computational models replicating amplitude-modulation encoding in the inferior colliculus (IC) are presented and compared. Neurons in this nucleus are modeled as point neurons using Mc Gregor equations, and receive depolarizing currents from action potentials delivered by stellate cells (chopper units) in the cochlear nucleus (CN). Stellate cells are modeled using modified Hodgkin-Huxley equations and receive inputs from a peripheral auditory model. The CN models of the two proposed architectures are characterized by an important dispersion of cellular characteristics, and therefore by various cellular best modulation frequencies (BMFs) ranging from 60 to 300 Hz. In contrast with the previous model proposed by [M.J. Hewitt, R. Meddis, A computer model of amplitude-modulation sensitivity of single units in the inferior colliculus, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95 (1994) 2145], each IC cell model receives convergent input from stellate cells with various BMFs. This approach assumes therefore minimal constraints on the model architecture and cell characteristics. The two models differ in terms of the neuronal structure of the IC, composed of 1 or 2 layers of point neurons acting as coincidence detectors. Each model is evaluated using two metrics: mean firing rate and modulation gain. Rate and temporal modulation transfer functions (r-MTFs and t-MTFs, respectively) are simulated and compared with physiological data. Simulations reveal that (i) an important dispersion of BMFs in the CN cells providing input to IC cells yields plausible IC cells responses to AM stimuli, (ii) the 2-layer IC structure yields the best approximation of IC responses measured in vivo.

[1]  M. Semple,et al.  Auditory temporal processing: responses to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones in the inferior colliculus. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Representation of the temporal envelope of sounds in the human brain. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  A. Guerin,et al.  A computer model for the temporal envelope encoding in the auditory pathway , 2003, Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37439).

[4]  R. Meddis Simulation of mechanical to neural transduction in the auditory receptor. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  C. Schreiner,et al.  Representation of amplitude modulation in the auditory cortex of the cat. I. The anterior auditory field (AAF) , 1986, Hearing Research.

[6]  R. Meddis,et al.  A computer model of dorsal cochlear nucleus pyramidal cells: intrinsic membrane properties. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  R. Meddis,et al.  A computer model of amplitude-modulation sensitivity of single units in the inferior colliculus. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  N. Cant,et al.  Parallel auditory pathways: projection patterns of the different neuronal populations in the dorsal and ventral cochlear nuclei , 2003, Brain Research Bulletin.

[9]  L. Carney,et al.  A phenomenological model of peripheral and central neural responses to amplitude-modulated tones. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Zachary M. Smith,et al.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception , 2002, Nature.

[11]  N. Cant Identification of cell types in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus that project to the inferior colliculus , 1982, Neuroscience Letters.

[12]  J. Eggermont Temporal modulation transfer functions for AM and FM stimuli in cat auditory cortex. Effects of carrier type, modulating waveform and intensity , 1994, Hearing Research.

[13]  Adrian Rees,et al.  Stimulus properties influencing the responses of inferior colliculus neurons to amplitude-modulated sounds , 1987, Hearing Research.

[14]  Frédéric Berthommier,et al.  Neuronal correlates of perceptual amplitude-modulation detection , 1995, Hearing Research.

[15]  C. Schreiner,et al.  Periodicity coding in the inferior colliculus of the cat. I. Neuronal mechanisms. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  Steven Greenberg,et al.  Physiology of the Cochlear Nuclei , 1992 .

[17]  C. Micheyl,et al.  Auditory stream segregation on the basis of amplitude-modulation rate. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Robert D Frisina,et al.  Encoding of amplitude modulation in the gerbil cochlear nucleus: I. A hierarchy of enhancement , 1990, Hearing Research.

[19]  Patrick Chauvel,et al.  Temporal envelope processing in the human left and right auditory cortices. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[20]  R. Frisina Subcortical neural coding mechanisms for auditory temporal processing , 2001, Hearing Research.

[21]  C E Schreiner,et al.  Neural processing of amplitude-modulated sounds. , 2004, Physiological reviews.

[22]  R. Fay,et al.  The Mammalian auditory pathway : neurophysiology , 1992 .

[23]  Adrian Rees,et al.  Dynamic properties of the responses of single neurons in the inferior colliculus of the rat , 1986, Hearing Research.

[24]  C. Schreiner,et al.  Representation of amplitude modulation in the auditory cortex of the cat. II. Comparison between cortical fields , 1988, Hearing Research.

[25]  R. Patterson,et al.  Complex Sounds and Auditory Images , 1992 .