The governance of smart mobility

Abstract There is an active contemporary debate about how emerging technologies such as automated vehicles, peer-to-peer sharing applications and the ‘internet of things’ will revolutionise individual and collective mobility. Indeed, it is argued that the so-called ‘Smart Mobility’ transition, in which these technologies combine to transform how the mobility system is organised and operates, has already begun. As with any socio-technical transition there are critical questions to be posed in terms of how the transition is managed, and how both the benefits and any negative externalities of change will be governed. This paper deploys the notion of ensuring and enhancing public value as a key governance aim for the transition. It sets out modes and methods of governance that could be deployed to steer the transition and, through four thematic cases explores how current mobility governance challenges will change. In particular, changing networks of actors, resources and power, new logics of consumption, and shifts in how mobility is regulated, priced and taxed – will require to be successfully negotiated if public value is to be captured from the transition. This is a critical time for such questions to be raised because technological change is clearly outpacing the capacity of systems and structures of governance to respond to the challenges already apparent. A failure to address both the short and longer-term governance issues risks locking the mobility system into transition paths which exacerbate rather than ameliorate the wider social and environmental problems that have challenged planners throughout the automobility transition.

[1]  Peter Söderbaum,et al.  Environmental Management: A Non-Traditional Approach , 1987 .

[2]  Asier Perallos,et al.  Intelligent Transport Systems: Technologies and Applications , 2015 .

[3]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Public Values and Public Interest: Counterbalancing Economic Individualism , 2007 .

[4]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  The dynamics of transitions in socio-technical systems: A multi-level analysis of the transition pathway from horse-drawn carriages to automobiles (1860–1930) , 2005, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[5]  P. Söderbaum Positional Analysis and Public Decision Making , 1982 .

[6]  Felix Rauschmayer,et al.  Towards a thick understanding of sustainability transitions — Linking transition management, capabilities and social practices , 2015 .

[7]  Don MacKenzie,et al.  Help or hindrance? The travel, energy and carbon impacts of highly automated vehicles , 2016 .

[8]  Gerda Falkner,et al.  Modes of governance: towards a conceptual clarification , 2007 .

[9]  Piyushimita Thakuriah,et al.  Seeing Cities Through Big Data: Research, Methods and Applications in Urban Informatics , 2016 .

[10]  Carolyn Ball,et al.  What Is Transparency? , 2009 .

[11]  Kees Maat,et al.  Stakeholders interests, expectations, and strategies regarding the development and implementation of electric vehicles: The case of the Netherlands , 2014 .

[12]  M. V. Asselt,et al.  More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy , 2001 .

[13]  S. Gössling,et al.  Why sustainable transport policies will fail: EU climate policy in the light of transport taboos , 2014 .

[14]  Arthur Benz,et al.  Governance — Modebegriff oder nützliches sozialwissenschaftliches Konzept? , 2004 .

[15]  Jeremy Millard,et al.  Open governance systems: Doing more with more , 2015, Government Information Quarterly.

[16]  John W. Polak,et al.  A new approach to predict the market and impacts of round-trip and point-to-point carsharing systems: Case study of London , 2014 .

[17]  Iain Docherty,et al.  STATE INTERVENTION IN CONTEMPORARY TRANSPORT , 2004 .

[18]  L. Fridstrøm,et al.  Policy Strategies for Vehicle Electrification , 2015 .

[19]  G. Lyons,et al.  Guidance for transport planning and policymaking in the face of an uncertain future , 2016 .

[20]  David Gelernter,et al.  Change: 19 Key Essays on How Internet Is Changing our Lives , 2014 .

[21]  C. Ranci Competitiveness and Social Cohesion in Western European Cities , 2011 .

[22]  R. Laing,et al.  Delivering lower carbon urban transport choices: European ambition meets the reality of institutional (mis)alignment , 2017 .

[23]  Marta C. González,et al.  The path most traveled: Travel demand estimation using big data resources , 2015, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[24]  John M. Bryson,et al.  Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the new public management , 2014 .

[25]  Tuomo Kuosa,et al.  The Evolution of Strategic Foresight: Navigating Public Policy Making , 2012 .

[26]  Harry C. Boyte,et al.  Constructive Politics as Public Work , 2011 .

[27]  Greg Marsden,et al.  Insights on disruptions as opportunities for transport policy change , 2013 .

[28]  D. Fesenmaier,et al.  Smartphone Use in Everyday Life and Travel , 2016 .

[29]  Michael Luca,et al.  Racial Discrimination in the Sharing Economy: Evidence from a Field Experiment , 2016 .

[30]  Adrian E. Coronado Mondragon,et al.  Defining a convergence network platform framework for smart grid and intelligent transport systems , 2015 .

[31]  J. Urry Climate change, travel and complex futures. , 2008, The British journal of sociology.

[32]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  A socio-technical analysis of low-carbon transitions: introducing the multi-level perspective into transport studies , 2012 .

[33]  Sangho Choo,et al.  Home-based telecommuting and intra-household interactions in work and non-work travel: A seemingly unrelated censored regression approach , 2015 .

[34]  Iain Docherty,et al.  Public Value of Intelligent Transportation System , 2015, 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[35]  Matthew Watson,et al.  How theories of practice can inform transition to a decarbonised transport system , 2012 .

[36]  Daniel J. Fagnant,et al.  Preparing a Nation for Autonomous Vehicles: Opportunities, Barriers and Policy Recommendations , 2015 .

[37]  Sahin Albayrak,et al.  The potential of interconnected service marketplaces for future mobility , 2015, Comput. Electr. Eng..

[38]  J. Urry The ‘System’ of Automobility , 2004 .

[39]  Colin Buchanan,et al.  Traffic in Towns , 1964 .

[40]  Geert Bouckaert,et al.  Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis , 2004 .

[41]  F. Geels The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms , 2011 .

[42]  Greg Marsden,et al.  Questions of governance: Rethinking the study of transportation policy , 2017 .

[43]  L. Whitmarsh,et al.  A multi-level analysis of sustainable mobility transitions: Niche development in the UK and Sweden , 2008 .

[44]  R. Rhodes Understanding Governance: Ten Years On , 2007 .

[45]  Michael Luca,et al.  Digital Discrimination: The Case of Airbnb.com , 2014 .

[46]  Noah J. Goodall,et al.  Ethical Decision Making during Automated Vehicle Crashes , 2014, ArXiv.

[47]  Natasha Merat,et al.  Human Factors, User Requirements, and User Acceptance of Ride-Sharing In Automated Vehicles , 2017 .

[48]  Giovanni Capoccia,et al.  The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative, and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism , 2007 .

[49]  Nicholas Low,et al.  Path dependence in urban transport: An institutional analysis of urban passenger transport in Melbourne, Australia, 1956–2006 , 2009 .

[50]  Robyn Dowling,et al.  Practice and public–private partnerships in sustainable transport governance: The case of car sharing in Sydney, Australia , 2015 .

[51]  R. Dowling,et al.  Neoliberal privatisation?: remapping the public and the private in Sydney's masterplanned residential estates , 2009 .

[52]  Paul Cairney,et al.  Complexity Theory in Political Science and Public Policy , 2012 .

[53]  J. Peck Neoliberalizing states: thin policies/hard outcomes , 2001 .

[54]  Debbie Hopkins,et al.  Change trends in urban freight delivery: A qualitative inquiry , 2016 .

[55]  A. Giddens The Politics of Climate Change , 2009 .